Coronavirus Thread (Off Topic, Politics) (354 Viewers)

Forums New posts
Sky_Blue_Dreamer

Sky_Blue_Dreamer

Well-Known Member
chiefdave said:
That would be how any other business would work. You go through the orders as recieved. If we ordered first we get delivery first.

Didn't we gamble and place orders way before we knew if it worked and promised to pay even if it didn't?

Of course if I was in the EU and being told there's no jabs to be had as we're on a waiting list I'm sure I'd be demanding something be done, especially if while being told there was none available they were being exported to other countries.

Certainly questions to be asked about how many orders were accepted and more importantly what promises were made about delivery times and how realistic those promises were.
Click to expand...

I agree getting orders fulfilled in the order they're placed. I think the EU are using the fact they paid up front as leverage (I'm assuming from this that we didn't btw) and this muddies the water a bit (tho in my opinion they are still mainly in the wrong here).

Say if someone ordered before you on credit and you paid up front a bit later you would feel a bit aggrieved that you'd already paid, they hadn't, yet they were getting orders fulfilled. IMO if that's how the contracts are made out the company has the obligation to fulfil them in the order received unless the up front payment contract specifically says they get to 'jump the queue'.

The issue for me is that it requires two doses and if we've started the rollout based on that and if we don't get the order in a timely fashion it will badly effect the timetable that should take precedent. Of course I feel in our rollout we should take these potential production problems into account and set aside each shipment accordingly (i.e. if we got 30m doses delivered we treat that as 15m to ensure those that got their first jab will get their second to make it as effective as possible).

I'm sure if it were the other way round we'd be complaining we hadn't received any of our order despite paying up front.
 
hill83

hill83

Well-Known Member
David O'Day said:
Ah the called out for flouncing off so pretend not to flounce move.

Classic since primary school
Click to expand...

I remember we clashed early on when you were convinced the virus wasn't going to be anything bad and last season wasn't going to be abandoned and you'd "dealt with" everyone, so I'll leave it thanks. You were the dribblingly positive corona guy at the time.
 
Last edited:
hill83

hill83

Well-Known Member
David O'Day

David O'Day

Well-Known Member
hill83 said:
I remember we clashed early on when you were convinced the virus wasn't going to be anything bad and last season wasn't going to be abandoned and you'd "dealt with" everyone, so I'll leave it thanks. You were the dribblingly positive corona guy at the time.
Click to expand...

I've already admitted I called that wrong ;)
 
chiefdave

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
Sky_Blue_Dreamer said:
I agree getting orders fulfilled in the order they're placed. I think the EU are using the fact they paid up front as leverage (I'm assuming from this that we didn't btw) and this muddies the water a bit (tho in my opinion they are still mainly in the wrong here).
Click to expand...
Looking at some old press releases it seems 700 million doses had already been ordered, including by the UK, by the time the EU got around to ordering.

As for paying up front that may be a case of semantics as the UK government put a considerable amount into the development of the vaccine and improvements in manufacturing capacity. Part of that funding was an agreement that a proportion of those doses manufacturers would go to developing countries that couldn't afford to buy the vaccine.

Not sure how far the EU can really push this. At the end of the day demand far outstrips supply so you'd think the manufacturer holds all the cards.
 
shmmeee

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
B

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
Johnson saying again schools are safe and Starmer should defy his ‘union paymasters’.

Keir selling out to ‘Big Teaching’ yet again
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 352 (members: 0, guests: 352)
Top