Do you want to discuss boring politics? (105 Viewers)

Sky Blue Pete

Well-Known Member
No words.



I’d love to have been a fly on the wall in her selection meeting. Imagine how pissed you’d be to have her selected over you. WTAF.

Great come back from Raab. However the question stands. I would have said ok that’s a no and moves on
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
Great come back from Raab. However the question stands. I would have said ok that’s a no and moves on

This is what bothered me most about Corbyns time. The quality of MPs we got because they were selected for loyalty and not quality. And it’s basically a job for life.
 

Sky_Blue_Dreamer

Well-Known Member
Most of the country disagrees with you and your constant views based on some chip on shoulder bitterness

What made you so bitter and resentful?

What are you talking about? I mention about you have a closed mind and just repeat the mantras of the powerful and apparently the majority of the population disagree with me? I didn't realise you were so famous and popular that we'd polled the country on your thought processes.

Plus if we're talking about governance by popular opinion then China holds over 10% of the world's population and their method of governance is almost universally popular there. Putin has a massive popularity level as well. Meanwhile here we largely think the PM is a buffoon, albeit a charismatic one and in the US it's split pretty much down the middle. So I guess going by what is popular we ought to ditch our systems and follow ones more akin to theirs. Do you not agree? Or do you think the popular opinion is flawed due to the inherent biases and controls of the system itself?

I'm not bitter or resentful, just exasperated and frustrated that so many people are taken in by the guff they get fed on all sides of the political spectrum.
 

Philosoraptor

Well-Known Member
What are you talking about? I mention about you have a closed mind and just repeat the mantras of the powerful and apparently the majority of the population disagree with me? I didn't realise you were so famous and popular that we'd polled the country on your thought processes.

Plus if we're talking about governance by popular opinion then China holds over 10% of the world's population and their method of governance is almost universally popular there. Putin has a massive popularity level as well. Meanwhile here we largely think the PM is a buffoon, albeit a charismatic one and in the US it's split pretty much down the middle. So I guess going by what is popular we ought to ditch our systems and follow ones more akin to theirs. Do you not agree? Or do you think the popular opinion is flawed due to the inherent biases and controls of the system itself?

I'm not bitter or resentful, just exasperated and frustrated that so many people are taken in by the guff they get fed on all sides of the political spectrum.

To be honest with you SBD, Democracy itself is flawed but it is the least harmful of the systems of Government.

What makes Democracy worthwhile is the intrinsic natures of Liberty and Equality found within it.

It is a shame that the political parties within this democratic framework do not have the same high standards.
 
Last edited:

Grendel

Well-Known Member
What are you talking about? I mention about you have a closed mind and just repeat the mantras of the powerful and apparently the majority of the population disagree with me? I didn't realise you were so famous and popular that we'd polled the country on your thought processes.

Plus if we're talking about governance by popular opinion then China holds over 10% of the world's population and their method of governance is almost universally popular there. Putin has a massive popularity level as well. Meanwhile here we largely think the PM is a buffoon, albeit a charismatic one and in the US it's split pretty much down the middle. So I guess going by what is popular we ought to ditch our systems and follow ones more akin to theirs. Do you not agree? Or do you think the popular opinion is flawed due to the inherent biases and controls of the system itself?

I'm not bitter or resentful, just exasperated and frustrated that so many people are taken in by the guff they get fed on all sides of the political spectrum.

 
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
Not registered, but didn't realise the Spectator had taken up scriptwriting for stand-up.
 

skybluetony176

Well-Known Member
That article might have a minuscule amount of credibility if it didn’t dismiss the PM who delivered the longest period of sustained growth in U.K. history as a landmark PM.
Introduced the minimum wage, banned fox hunting, Britannia was cool again, GDP went through the roof, devolution, GFA. I can’t stand the bloke and believe the Iraq war was a lie he should face justice for but to not recognise the good things he done and dismiss him as a landmark PM the article is clearly written by someone with an agenda and therefore completely unbalanced.
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
Neil Coyle is the Sunderland of Labour MP’s - thinks he has a divine right to be considered a ‘top-tier’ MP when in reality he’s a small-time prick living in the past.

Genuinely don’t even know who he is.
 

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
This is an interesting story.
Wonder how predictable who will think its a good idea and who will think its outrageous will be :D
 

skybluetony176

Well-Known Member
This is an interesting story.
Wonder how predictable who will think its a good idea and who will think its outrageous will be :D
I’d never have the option due to the nature of my work but I wouldn’t begrudge others the possibility. My wife in her work could definitely do a 4 day week.
 

COV

Well-Known Member
This is an interesting story.
Wonder how predictable who will think its a good idea and who will think its outrageous will be :D

I'm in the "good idea" camp for sure

Been proven to work, good for people. Lots of places starting to roll it out, or at least a version of it via flexitime.
 

skybluetony176

Well-Known Member
This is what I mean about The Express


If their readership really buys articles like this and think that will show the EU, Brexit wins again then they’re dribbling idiots.
 
D

Deleted member 4439

Guest
Some more brexit stories



 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
Where do people go for balanced Brexit news? Everywhere has a very clear bias, even the big US and European news outlets have a culture war or EU dog in the fight. U.K. outlets all seem to take a side and stick with it.
 

Northants Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
Some more brexit stories




As Schmmeee indicates, its unlikely these 3 articles from a Boris Johnson fanzine are providing a neutral viewpoint
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
As Schmmeee indicates, its unlikely these 3 articles from a Boris Johnson fanzine are providing a neutral viewpoint

Only did the first one, London is back ahead by <€1bn after being ahead in Dec by >€12bn.

Wasn’t my point though, as the articles in the Guardian are as bad the other way.
 

Northants Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
Only did the first one, London is back ahead by <€1bn after being ahead in Dec by >€12bn.

Wasn’t my point though, as the articles in the Guardian are as bad the other way.

No your point was that articles on either side are usually biased which I agree the Telegraph and Guardian routinely prove.

The difference being 90% of print media leans heavily to the right
 

skybluetony176

Well-Known Member
As Schmmeee indicates, its unlikely these 3 articles from a Boris Johnson fanzine are providing a neutral viewpoint
The first story doesn’t make up for the lost revenue for the city. No Brexit win.

The Nissan story seems to be regurgitated every month, it’s only actually happened once, Nissan actually already had a battery factory next door to the car plant while we were in the EU and given that the electric car market is a growing market and the future you’d be hard pushed to say this investment wouldn’t have happened anyway.

Haven’t read the third story but I dare say that the “EU” plot was just actually what was always going to happen when we left as per the rules we helped write decades ago. So no plot, just what it is.
 
D

Deleted member 4439

Guest
No your point was that articles on either side are usually biased which I agree the Telegraph and Guardian routinely prove.

Both are probably as bad as the other, which was really the point of my post - that the relentless, daily posting of the guardian and twitter feeds here have an opposite number that we can all choose to dance around, not that I can be bothered quite frankly.
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
Both are probably as bad as the other, which was really the point of my post - that the relentless, daily posting of the guardian and twitter feeds here have an opposite number that we can all choose to dance around, not that I can be bothered quite frankly.

No I agree, and could have answered the same to those posts, but yaknow biases.

Genuine question though. It's a topic I find really hard to source decent news. Those that care enough to report have an angle and those that don't have an angle don't care. So it's just the stream of bullshit from both sides. Which I guess means there's nothing to report of note. Probably best to reconvene in five years and look at the data.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top