chiefdave
Well-Known Member
Isn't this how all vaccines work? If you don't have the boosters required you're not considered vaccinated?
Isn't this how all vaccines work? If you don't have the boosters required you're not considered vaccinated?
Well tbf it's six months after your second, so not every three months.Well i was under the impression a yearly booster was on the agenda, which is fair.
Not one every 3 months
Which is why these moments of doubt are only fleeting. But they're there, and I think it's healthy to have that little bit of doubt about things. If you don't you're probably not going to last long. It's about making sure those doubts don't get out of control.
As an aside, six months after my second jab is... Christmas Day.
That's one way to spend it, I suppose(!)
My question for that would be, why they're necessarily surprised, given Israel were starting to show waning immunity as our vaccines were being rolled out, and of course flu has to be given annually, and most people have some kind of natural immunity to flu, built up over the years - we're starting from stage zero with Covid.
The figures after a booster look at first glance admittedly, to be so good that there's no real need to adapt it - they really are impressive. And variants will always come along in this, it's whether the vaccine still works on them or not that's important.
To a degree I'd find this harder to argue against. I guess my main issue would be depressing spread, that again from the figures about whether you actually catch Covid after your third, looks like a way to pushing down spread is indeed a third shot - we'll see, of course.
Lockdowns here we come then because some of our populace don’t trust our medical experts to advise us. Oh well ffsDid a quick straw poll at work today and of those in my phone contacts who i maintain contact with, about jab 3. Those that are double jabbed of course
At work of the 26 people asked, 15 said no. 10 yes 1 undecided
Phone, 16 asked, 9 no, 7 yes.
Seems its not only me that is really not keen on jab 3
Yes, I find in incomprehensible that somebody couldn't anticipate the potential need for a booster given the vaccine was developed in a period of about 6 months, so of course the long term efficacy was unknown. The internet has rotted brains with so much willingness to believe in silly conspiracy theories.Every single person I know who’s double jabbed without exception when we’ve spoke about it has said they will have the third jab.
And unless I’ve totally lost the plot I’ve always expected a third jab, and a fourth. And so on. Was that not always the case?
I don't think the info and messaging has been the greatest this time.
There was a two month lag on making the decision from first suggesting it , indecision breeds indecision IMO.
No that's pretty good progress but there been questions like the Oxford Dame who suggested it wasn't needed at that point?theres been 13 million boosters so far almost so I don’t see a lot of indecision of this fine menu
Lockdowns here we come then because some of our populace don’t trust our medical experts to advise us. Oh well ffs
Is this bait? It feels like bait. Your history suggests you could genuinely believe this though.As if lockdowns work anyway too…eurgh
Depends what you think they are forAs if lockdowns work anyway too…eurgh
Jesus and then the brother died not long after
Where I do understand is vaccine shedding. If people are not taking regular lateral flow tests it is likely people who are vaccinated are more likely to be asymptomatic transmitters isn’t it?Fucking hell those messages on her feed between her brother and cousin are unbelievable.
Literally death by TikTok.
Where I do understand is vaccine shedding. If people are not taking regular lateral flow tests it is likely people who are vaccinated are more likely to be asymptomatic transmitters isn’t it?
Where I do understand is vaccine shedding. If people are not taking regular lateral flow tests it is likely people who are vaccinated are more likely to be asymptomatic transmitters isn’t it?
Hasn’t it been debunked as a hoax? Do any of the covid vaccines being used contain a weakened form of covid-19?Where I do understand is vaccine shedding. If people are not taking regular lateral flow tests it is likely people who are vaccinated are more likely to be asymptomatic transmitters isn’t it?
Some vaccines are live (think that’s the right term) vaccines, not sure on Covid. I know someone who has a compromised immune system having lost their spleen in an accident and it’s recommended that they don’t have any live vaccine or be close to someone who has for a period of time after they’ve had a live vaccine. I think there is a small risk for a very short period of time but only if your immune system is compromised in the first place. Healthy people with no underlying health conditions are no more vulnerable to “shedding” should it even exist in this incident than they would if they’d have had the vaccine themselves in the first place. As far as I understand it anyway. It’s a typical example of the anti vax morons latching onto a small fragment of a truth to invent a lie.Hasn’t it been debunked as a hoax? Do any of the covid vaccines being used contain a weakened form of covid-19?
Hasn’t it been debunked as a hoax? Do any of the covid vaccines being used contain a weakened form of covid-19?
Darwin had it rightJesus and then the brother died not long after
The UK threw away more than 600,000 doses of the AstraZeneca vaccine after the life-saving jabs were allowed to pass their expiry date, The Independent can reveal.
In what has been described as an “absolute scandal”, the government failed to donate the doses to poorer countries struggling to access Covid vaccines – despite previous promises to redistribute supplies that were deemed surplus to requirements in the UK.
The doses were no longer needed in Britain after the decision was made in May to stop offering the AstraZeneca vaccine to younger age groups because of concerns over rare blood clotting.
This left an excess of vaccines, 604,400 of which eventually expired in August before being destroyed at the end of the month, according to data obtained by a Freedom of Information request.
Why on earth would you just hold on to doses until they expire when you've already decided not to use them?
There's no mention of that in the article so no idea.If they expired in August COVAX would not have allowed them to be dispatched anyway even in June would they?
CourseIf everyone had been vaccinated this wouldn’t be a concern
The shedding is bat shit insane what I meant was as a double jabbed phase 1 elite about to have booster I may not be as thoughtful about whether I’m asymptomatic m. That’s the only part I sort of understand.Hasn’t it been debunked as a hoax? Do any of the covid vaccines being used contain a weakened form of covid-19?
There's no mention of that in the article so no idea.
Found another article that said the UK had donated doses in August that were due to expire in September which would seem to indicate that donating the 600K in question back in May with an expiry of August wouldn't have been an issue but if the rules say otherwise then that's obviously why they were binned.