Do you want to discuss boring politics? (99 Viewers)

Grendel

Well-Known Member
All I'm saying is people have taken Reeves' comments saying she doesn't agree with Corbyn's antisemitism and NATO stance as 'I'M SO GLAD THE TORIES WON!!'. Which clearly is not what she's said.

No she wanted Boris Johnson to win the election

I assume you voted for the - according to you - the anti Semite mr Corbyn
 

clint van damme

Well-Known Member
One thing the past few years has surely shown is that it's pretty stupid the left being the main opposition to the left. Corbyn, Starmer, whoever (Ed Fucking Davey, Caroline Lucas) are all better than what we have!

Perhaps then, Starmer should have put q bit more effort in to his pledge to Unite the party, or not made it at all if he wasn't sincere about it.
 

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
No she wanted Boris Johnson to win the election

I assume you voted for the - according to you - the anti Semite mr Corbyn
Do these people not realise how ridiculous they are with this scorched earth rubbish? They will be monstered by the media in the next election, they're currently pulling sufficient rope from the reel to hang themselves
 
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
No she didn't.

You can think Corbyn would be a bad prime minister AND still prefer him to win the election.

That's her thinking. It was my thinking too. Plus millions of others.
...and of course is why we've ended up with BJ the Great in charge
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
Do these people not realise how ridiculous they are with this scorched earth rubbish? They will be monstered by the media in the next election, they're currently pulling sufficient rope from the reel to hang themselves

Starmer has an open goal now and he still can’t convert. He’s actually hopeless even Sophie Rainsworth can flatten him on a Sunday morning - he’s over sensitive, bland with no vision or actual beliefs - let’s be honest his more in common with Jeremy Hunt than Keir Hardy
 
  • Haha
Reactions: PVA

clint van damme

Well-Known Member
And of course Corbyn et al should have done similar... and so it goes on, while the Tories laugh and win.

I disagree,Corbyn was too accommodating. I think that's where he messed up, it fed into his poor brexit messaging and he kept snakes like Tom Watson around for too long.

I actually think Starmer did the right thing getting rid of the left of the party from his shadow cabinet when heslooking to go another way but that doesn't mean he couldn't have reached out to left wing party members/ voters.

I really want a reason to vote for him but I'm struggling.
 
D

Deleted member 9744

Guest
I didn't vote for them in the first place. The choice in 2019 was between Labour and all the chaos that has unfolded. But the current shadow cabinet seems quite content with the election of the Tories in 2019, so, i'm sorry but I am not now voting to remove them cos people like Rachel Reeves have got their choice of leader on board.
So you would rather the Tories won again?
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member

skybluetony176

Well-Known Member
Johnson is so hopeless he had to hide in a fucking fridge
And India

Talking of India, it was such a crucial visit he’s declining the opportunity to make a statement about his visit in the House of Commons. Which apparently is another first. A PM has never visited another state as a state visit and then not made statement in the commons upon their return.
 
D

Deleted member 9744

Guest
I think he wants a labour party to win and it doesn’t exist at the moment - to be fair a Tory party doesn’t either
Well that is not true is it? Of course there is a Labour Party and there is Tory Party. They might not be the ones any if us would choose, but they are the options we have.

I am just trying to understand why Fernando is saying he is not going to vote to try to defeat the current Government. I understand why you wouldn't given your political views but I don't understand why he wouldn't given what I believe his views to be.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
Well that is not true is it? Of course there is a Labour Party and there is Tory Party. They might not be the ones any if us would choose, but they are the options we have.

I am just trying to understand why Fernando is saying he is not going to vote to try to defeat the current Government. I understand why you wouldn't given your political views but I don't understand why he wouldn't given what I believe his views to be.

i suspect because his ideology is a party that helps and assists working classes and creates equalisation

I certainly have no worries if a Starmer led government took office as he’s right of centre and I know income wise I’d ne unthreatened - I couldn’t care if he won tbh
 
  • Haha
Reactions: PVA

Grendel

Well-Known Member
Wouldn’t it actually be great if had Thatcher vs Rayner or McDonnell in a general election

Total conviction politicians compared to the circus performer and the Islington bore

God at least politics would be engaging
 
D

Deleted member 9744

Guest
i suspect because his ideology is a party that helps and assists working classes and creates equalisation

I certainly have no worries if a Starmer led government took office as he’s right of centre and I know income wise I’d ne unthreatened - I couldn’t care if he won tbh
But presumably as a Tory you love to hear of left leaning people deciding not to vote against the Government?
 

David O'Day

Well-Known Member
I didn't vote for them in the first place. The choice in 2019 was between Labour and all the chaos that has unfolded. But the current shadow cabinet seems quite content with the election of the Tories in 2019, so, i'm sorry but I am not now voting to remove them cos people like Rachel Reeves have got their choice of leader on board.
oh well they'll really miss your vote
 

David O'Day

Well-Known Member
Well that is not true is it? Of course there is a Labour Party and there is Tory Party. They might not be the ones any if us would choose, but they are the options we have.

I am just trying to understand why Fernando is saying he is not going to vote to try to defeat the current Government. I understand why you wouldn't given your political views but I don't understand why he wouldn't given what I believe his views to be.
it's all about him
 

David O'Day

Well-Known Member
All I'm saying is people have taken Reeves' comments saying she doesn't agree with Corbyn's antisemitism and NATO stance as 'I'M SO GLAD THE TORIES WON!!'. Which clearly is not what she's said.
because they are bitter that corbyn was never going to win an election so they make up shit
 

PVA

Well-Known Member
That other party doesn't exactly make it an appealing choice. It's coming down to who Starmer isn't rather than who he is

But regardless of what you think about Starmer, if you think he isn't left leaning enough, or if you think Corbyn is better... Labour with Starmer is clearly preferable to the Tories.

So if the three choices are:

A) vote Tory
B) vote Labour
C) none of the above because you don't like Starmer/he's not Jeremy Corbyn, most likely resulting in a Tory government

Why would you choose C? That's just cutting your nose off to spite your face.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top