Do you want to discuss boring politics? (174 Viewers)

Philosoraptor

Well-Known Member
Will you be using the same type of argument saying it's clean and safe?
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
What are uranium reserves like? I'm on board with the argument for nuclear but it still isn't the ideal scenario (IE one where the UK is materially self-dependent on its domestic energy supply)
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
What are uranium reserves like? I'm on board with the argument for nuclear but it still isn't the ideal scenario (IE one where the UK is materially self-dependent on its domestic energy supply)

About 135 years left according to this: Peak uranium - Wikipedia

We’ve wasted too much time to worry about ideal. Hopefully 100 years is long enough to get fusion off the ground or significantly improve renewables. I’d still want solar and wind at every viable location personally.
 

Philosoraptor

Well-Known Member
You think nuclear power causes BSE now?

I think it might be time for bed.

I think you either dodge a subject or find information which suits your cause.

Any idea why nuclear power station are built on coasts, mostly away from population centres, and are scarce in amount built compared to other power plants?

Registering deaths per KWH is just bonkers.


Also have a fly past of the exclusion zone, which is around twice the size of London.



Just out of interest, when do you think the exclusion zone around Chernobyl will become habitable again?
 
Last edited:

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
I think you either dodge a subject or find information which suits your cause.

Any idea why nuclear power station are built on coasts, mostly away from population centres, and are scarce in amount built compared to power plants?

Registering deaths per KWH is just bonkers.


Also have a fly past of the exclusion zone, which is around twice the size of London.



Just out of interest, when do you think the exclusion zone around Chernobyl will become habitable again?

I think our standards would be a bit better than the Soviet ones of 40 years ago. But consider how ‘habitable’ some parts of the world already are because of continued fossil fuel usage. Look at what’s starting to happen each summer with other parts of the world going on fire.

We need a rapid way to immediately wean off coal oil and gas while the long term answer is found.
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
I think you either dodge a subject or find information which suits your cause.

Any idea why nuclear power station are built on coasts, mostly away from population centres, and are scarce in amount built compared to other power plants?

Registering deaths per KWH is just bonkers.


Also have a fly past of the exclusion zone, which is around twice the size of London.



Just out of interest, when do you think the exclusion zone around Chernobyl will become habitable again?


Chernobyl. Really? You realise how that happened didn’t you? Again do you think that would happen in this day and age? In this country? It’s like saying trains aren’t safe as a technology because of 7/7.


What measure would you use?

its like plane travel. Seems big and scary but actually safer than driving.

what is your solution for clean energy exactly?
 

Philosoraptor

Well-Known Member
I just don't think people would be that worried if it was a wind or solar power plant.

Or any other...
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
You do realise there's a war going on around the largest nuclear plant in Europe?

I do. What do you think is going to happen?

You do know how modern nuclear reactors are built don’t you? And again, if the U.K. is hit by war or earthquakes or tsunamis then we’ve got much much bigger problems.

Why not compare us to someone similar like France?
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
I've seen a stat that I found mind blowing, a 10 hour flight on a private jet uses more than 70 years of power for the average home (family of 4). I mean, I knew that private jets were bad just not that bad.

The top 1% are really where we should be focusing the “personal responsibility” stuff. Their usage massively outweighs what any of us even in a developed nation does.

But seemingly if you’re rich you’re a special unicorn who can’t be upset.
 

TomRad85

Well-Known Member
The top 1% are really where we should be focusing the “personal responsibility” stuff. Their usage massively outweighs what any of us even in a developed nation does.

But seemingly if you’re rich you’re a special unicorn who can’t be upset.
Don't forget the Hollywood sorts who like to preach about this shit but basically just do whatever the fuck they want. The worst kind hypocrites.

Sent from my SM-G973F using Tapatalk
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
Don't forget the Hollywood sorts who like to preach about this shit but basically just do whatever the fuck they want. The worst kind hypocrites.

Sent from my SM-G973F using Tapatalk

Everyone’s a hypocrite, but yeah I’d put them in too. Isn’t Taylor Swift the biggest individual polluter on the planet or something?

The current breed of climate activists get a lot of shit but I thought the XR ones who shut down that airfield used by private jets had the right idea. Focus on that and you’ll probably actually do significant good and have the public behind you.
 

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
Looking like China is going to be hit by a big COVID surge as it still pretends to in late 2019/early 2020. Vaccine take up in the elderly is poor and the ongoing restrictions are just not tenable. More supply shock coming for the West.
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
Looking like China is going to be hit by a big COVID surge as it still pretends to in late 2019/early 2020. Vaccine take up in the elderly is poor and the ongoing restrictions are just not tenable. More supply shock coming for the West.

Things getting hairy over there with protests too. Interesting times. Major change in the two big non western geopolitical poles coming up?
 
D

Deleted member 9744

Guest
The top 1% are really where we should be focusing the “personal responsibility” stuff. Their usage massively outweighs what any of us even in a developed nation does.

But seemingly if you’re rich you’re a special unicorn who can’t be upset.
Yes the argument that our problems especially climate change is down to overpopulation isn't right at all. The problem is the behaviour of the richest few.
 

skybluetony176

Well-Known Member
I've seen a stat that I found mind blowing, a 10 hour flight on a private jet uses more than 70 years of power for the average home (family of 4). I mean, I knew that private jets were bad just not that bad.
Private aircraft are responsible for more pollution than commercial aircraft. Yet the rhetoric always seems to be making Joe Bloggs feel guilty about flying to Spain once a year with 80 other people on a Ryan Air flight with a shared carbon footprint. Reality is that if we banned private jets the world can probably sustain commercial flights in conjunction with carbon offsetting projects and we can all travel guilt free.
 

Philosoraptor

Well-Known Member
Looking like China is going to be hit by a big COVID surge as it still pretends to in late 2019/early 2020. Vaccine take up in the elderly is poor and the ongoing restrictions are just not tenable. More supply shock coming for the West.

Been talking about this on Bloomberg today. No change in the market though. China50 went up like a rocket at 6.00am, now holding steady. Can see big changes in the next few weeks if it spreads.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top