Transfer Rumour Panzo coming back? (3 Viewers)
- Thread starter Blind-Faith
- Start date
The Philosopher
Well-Known Member
It’s au revoir not goodbye it seems.
David O'Day
Well-Known Member
Nothing in that really, see you soon is probably in loads of "leaving" messages anyway.
Matt smith
Well-Known Member
Matt smith
Well-Known Member
Posted this on a few threads so apologies, think there’s something in it
Blind-Faith
Well-Known Member
I said last season, when he’s good he’s really good, but when’s he’s bad ……
Get some consistency to his game, I’d have him back in a heartbeat
Get some consistency to his game, I’d have him back in a heartbeat
covcity4life
Well-Known Member
Like I said before i hope this one happens. He knows his cameo wasn't good. But it was just that. He's got all the attributes to put it together. Only reason he was on bench was cos Doyle was amazing Infront of him for LCB. Now might be his time to shine.
SeaSeeEffCee
Well-Known Member
Would be good to mantain some continuity in the squad. Clearly quite popula as well.
skybluepm2
Well-Known Member
I definitely think there’s something in this, especially with the club and Palmer’s response.
Robins was after him for ages so it wouldn’t surprise me in the slightest if we’d signed him permanently. He didn’t get a lot of game time after Christmas, when he had a run in the side beforehand, he was pretty solid. Someone who I think will improve and become a quality cb. Has age on his side too.
David O'Day
Well-Known Member
We could do worse at LCB, it was the plan to play him more there but they were surprised at how good Doyle actually ended up being.
David O'Day
Well-Known Member
So is everyone according to the scottish press even though they are skint and need to cut costs.
D
Deleted member 5849
Guest
Unlike Doyle, Panzo never really recovered from his ropey spell. Can't get excited at the thought of him at CB I'm afraid, he gives me the heebie jeebies.
SkyblueDad
Well-Known Member
In fairness I think he played with injury and was out a while with it, Doyle & McNally established themselves either side of McFadz so it became tough to get his place back if permanent and cheap I’d take him, with a rest and a full pre-season I think he could be a good acquisition.
shepardo01
Well-Known Member
If we want to progress, we can't really be going for downgrades on what we had this year (Doyle). It is the job of recruitment to be scouring the market for a Doyle replacement (difficult), rather than settling for Panzo. Unless he's agreeing that he'll be happy to be part of the squad.
skybluepm2
Well-Known Member
We certainly need 4 or 5 top quality centre backs imo. Having Panzo and McNally alongside Fadz would keep the continuity and familiarity of knowing how one another play and what Robins expects.
Will Fadz have yet another top quality season? I wouldn’t put it past him but he isn’t getting any younger and there may come a time where he isn’t able to play Saturday/Tuesday consistently.
Will Fadz have yet another top quality season? I wouldn’t put it past him but he isn’t getting any younger and there may come a time where he isn’t able to play Saturday/Tuesday consistently.
Great_Expectations
Well-Known Member
I like Panzo.
When he came on at Wembley I said to my mate ‘he’s a good player, but he has mistake in him’ - and then he did exactly that!
With some consistent game time and you’d hope confidence, I think he can be a good player for us - and critically cut out some of the mistakes.
Popular member of the squad and some continuity in a summer of change.
When he came on at Wembley I said to my mate ‘he’s a good player, but he has mistake in him’ - and then he did exactly that!
With some consistent game time and you’d hope confidence, I think he can be a good player for us - and critically cut out some of the mistakes.
Popular member of the squad and some continuity in a summer of change.
fernandopartridge
Well-Known Member
We can't progress and consolidate that progress relying on loans in key positions to be honest, for that reason I wouldn't be against Panzo as a permanent signing. It would be incredibly difficult to find another loanee that represents an upgrade on Doyle who is at the dominant club in British and probably European football.
Sky Blue Harry H
Well-Known Member
Happy with a permanent deal. He can win headers in both boxes too.
larry_david
Well-Known Member
My memory might be tricking me but didn't an 'itk' say we were trying to sign Panzo on a perm deal and that's why the transfer took so long and we settled on a loan? I'm sure it was the missing presumed dom hyam skybluebeliever and the general hint was it was nearly almost done as a permanent move but they ran out of time so went loan.
If my memory is right, I'm pretty sure it will happen
If my memory is right, I'm pretty sure it will happen
Winny the Bish
Well-Known Member
Wouldn’t be surprised at all. Long term target, Forest don’t really need him, and it’s not easy to find decent left footed CB’s.
He is an ersatz Doyle, but we all consider Doyle a potential England player so it’s hard not to be in comparison.
He is an ersatz Doyle, but we all consider Doyle a potential England player so it’s hard not to be in comparison.
Happy_Martian
Well-Known Member
Panzo had as many good moments as horrendous ones. And you can't compare him to Doyle. Doyle came to us on the back of almost a full season at Sunderland in a competitive league. Panz had only played 25 games in the previous 2 1/2 years in France when he arrived. So not even close to being at his best.
If he were to be loaned back (or we try and buy him), a full preseason and the chance to cement the CB role permanently instead of sharing with another loanee, I think we'd have another gem in our squad.
If he were to be loaned back (or we try and buy him), a full preseason and the chance to cement the CB role permanently instead of sharing with another loanee, I think we'd have another gem in our squad.
Happy_Martian
Well-Known Member
HuckerbyDublinWhelan
Well-Known Member
I mean we had Giles back for half a season after he played about 5 mins in league one