Luton Ground (6 Viewers)

Flying Fokker

Well-Known Member
Is it right that their first home game has been postponed. Ground unfit due to work. Frustrating for fans.
 

stay_up_skyblues

Well-Known Member
Dif Glass House GIF by OsloHolm
Should probably keep our heads down on this one.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
Well....Wasp agreed that we had primacy over the use of the ground when in fact we were locked out. We paid full rent and Luton put the money instead into the team over seasons.

We hadn’t got our ground ready when we moved into the Ricoh
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
think your right 😂 although we didn’t postpone our games, couldn’t they play it somewhere else

We played our first games away
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
I don't see the equivalence. For Luton it's the sisu new pitch you should be comparing to. A bit like Santa , God and the Tooth Fairy

Eh the Ricoh stadium wasn’t ready when we first played there and we couldn’t play the first game at home
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
I know but it was well on the way. Where is the new Luton ground that's compliant with the regs that they've been 'building' for years?

Its 1 match
 

jim20

Well-Known Member
If they'd built a compliant stadium they would still be in L1 at best. They failed to get their ground in order and cheated the rest of us in the process
I agree, I’ve said it before, in the past teams have not been promoted as stadiums not up to scratch. They’ve made a conscious decision not to spend money on the stadium and spend it on players, knowing their ground is not fit for the PL. our situation was different in that we paid the money to rent the stadium and the landlords didn’t have it up to scratch, we didn’t gain a competitive advantage, where as Luton surely have. A bit like Red Bull over spending the budget cap on F1, a conscious decision to cheat.
 

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
Eh the Ricoh stadium wasn’t ready when we first played there and we couldn’t play the first game at home
And the first game there was at reduced capacity as well. Though I think the club actually got some money off the council for that in the form of a rent reduction.

Sent from my Pixel 7 using Tapatalk
 

SlowerThanPlatt

Well-Known Member
I agree, I’ve said it before, in the past teams have not been promoted as stadiums not up to scratch. They’ve made a conscious decision not to spend money on the stadium and spend it on players, knowing their ground is not fit for the PL. our situation was different in that we paid the money to rent the stadium and the landlords didn’t have it up to scratch, we didn’t gain a competitive advantage, where as Luton surely have. A bit like Red Bull over spending the budget cap on F1, a conscious decision to cheat.
The most they’ve spent on a player to get promoted is £1.8m - some cheaters
 

SlowerThanPlatt

Well-Known Member
Until this season it’s more than we’d spent on a player
I know but doesn’t sound like some masterplan!

Fair enough if they were throwing tens of millions of pounds around but clearly they’re a club who operate within their means
 

jim20

Well-Known Member
I know but doesn’t sound like some masterplan!

Fair enough if they were throwing tens of millions of pounds around but clearly they’re a club who operate within their means
But if they’d spent the money on the stadium they should’ve done, they wouldn’t have had the team they had. I’m not saying they shouldn’t have gone up. There are teams that have bent or broken the rules (e.g Derby) far more than they have. But in my view it could still be considered a form of cheating.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top