Transfer Rumour Panzo coming back? (11 Viewers)

[Martin180]

I think he lost confidence for a spell then lost his place. I think he has ability but I'd only sign him permanently not on loan

I wouldn't , we've moved on and are recruiting better than at this stage last season . Panzo was ultimately a bad loan and didn't really offer anything for the second half of the season

 

---

[Matt smith]

The McNally obsession is weird

Really weird

 

[Martin180]

Panzo was fine, Doyle was just really, really good. No shame in not being able to get in the team 2nd half of last season

Fair assessment but I don't see massive improvement in Panzo

 

[Balli001]

I wouldn't , we've moved on and are recruiting better than at this stage last season . Panzo was ultimately a bad loan and didn't really offer anything for the second half of the season

I still disagree with you.

 

[Matt smith]

Absolutely

They play different sides of the defence ffs

 

[SleepyGinger]

Could do better also

Yeah hopefully Binks

 

[Matt smith]

So much improvement in Panzo to come

 

[SeaSeeEffCee]

Wouldn’t want him on loan again.

 

[Matt smith]

Superb ?
Our upturn in form coincided with him being dropped for better technical players in Doyle and McNally
I hope we avoid getting him back

Superb maybe a bit strong but he was good yes

 

[David O'Day]

Fair assessment but I don't see massive improvement in Panzo

he was really good at times as well

just because because our young player of the year was better doesn't mean he wasn't good

 

[Martin180]

So much improvement in Panzo to come

Where exactly ?

 

[Matt smith]

Where exactly ?

Did you watch him on that great run we had pre World Cup!

he’s a good player and has just as much potential as McNally to make it at the top level in my opinion

 

[Martin180]

he was really good at times as well

just because because our young player of the year was better doesn't mean he wasn't good

I think if we're getting another lcb it needs to be a more experienced player as when Fadz is out our back line is very young

 

[fernandopartridge]

Superb ?
Our upturn in form coincided with him being dropped for better technical players in Doyle and McNally
I hope we avoid getting him back

He was in the side in the first upturn in form.

Sent from my Pixel 7 using Tapatalk

 

[Matt smith]

I think if we're getting another lcb it needs to be a more experienced players as when Fadz is out our back line is very young

No I do get that point, so you’d say no to the Chelsea guy?

 

[Martin180]

Did you watch him on that great run we had pre World Cup!

he’s a good player

I was asking where the massive improvement was to come ?
He was athletic and physical but technically inept , improving that is difficult in the short term

 

[Matt smith]

I was asking where the massive improvement was to come ?
He was athletic and physical but technically inept , improving that is difficult in the short term

Technically inept? Im sorry I disagree with that

was constantly bringing the ball forward

 

[Martin180]

No I do get that point, so you’d say no to the Chelsea guy?

No I definitely wouldn't as he is superb but without Fadz and Bidwell our back 5 would have an average age of 22/23

 

[Matt smith]

No I definitely wouldn't as he is superb but without Fadz and Bidwell our back 5 would have an average age of 22/23

Have you seen him play?

 

[David O'Day]

I was asking where the massive improvement was to come ?
He was athletic and physical but technically inept , improving that is difficult in the short term

Technically inept? ok

 

[SkyBlue_Adam]

What does the tweet say?

 

[Matt smith]

Technically inept? ok

Honestly don’t get the criticism of Panzo

 

[Matt smith]

What does the tweet say?

We’re looking at him basically

 

[Martin180]

Have you seen him play?

Im saying I would take him , you asked if I would be opposed to it and I said I definitely wouldn't be
Please read the replies

 

[Matt smith]

Im saying I would take him , you asked if I would be opposed to it and I said I definitely wouldn't be
Please read the replies

Yes I read them

you said you wanted experience ie no Panzo but you want humphries so you’ve contradicted yourself

I’m sorry that run we had pre World Cup Panzo was very good

 

[PlasticPigsAtTheValley]

I think people's perspective of Panzo is poisoned by a recency bias, particularly after what happened in the play-off final. He wasn't actually a bad player, he just fell out of form and was probably lacking in confidence after being displaced by Callum Doyle (who was class) in the latter half of the season. Realistically, as a left-footed CB around the age of 22-23, he currently fits our model of recruitment, and I think people have written him off far too soon. There's no doubt a decent player there imo. Definitely wouldn't mind having him back, especially for some much needed squad depth in the defensive department.
Alternatively, I also wouldn't mind taking a punt at Humphreys who would seem to offer some potentially similar qualities minus the trauma attached to Panzo due to that play-off incident

 

[Martin180]

Yes I read them

you said you wanted experience ie no Panzo but you want humphries so you’ve contradicted yourself

No you asked if I would take Humphries after I stated I would prefer an experienced player
I would absolutely take Humphries but worry about the age and experience of our back line without another older head
Please read the replies

 

[Matt smith]

No you asked if I would take Humphries after I stated I would prefer an experienced player
I would absolutely take Humphries but worry about the age and experience of our back line without another older head
Please read the replies

Panzo would be a great permanent addition, clear to see he has a great relationship with Adi too

 

[David O'Day]

I think people's perspective of Panzo is poisoned by a recency bias, particularly after what happened in the play-off final. He wasn't actually a bad player, he just fell out of form and was probably lacking in confidence after being displaced by Callum Doyle (who was class) in the latter half of the season. Realistically, as a left-footed CB around the age of 22-23, he currently fits our model of recruitment, and I think people have written him off far too soon. There's no doubt a decent player there imo. Definitely wouldn't mind having him back, especially for some much needed squad depth in the defensive department.
Alternatively, I also wouldn't mind taking a punt at Humphreys who would seem to offer some potentially similar qualities minus the trauma attached to Panzo due to that play-off incident

also in the play-off final if the Luton doesn't slam dunk the ball he's flicked over him and everything is fine

 

[SkyBlue_Adam]

Panzo would be a great permanent addition, clear to see he has a great relationship with Adi too

especially with all the new players we have.. getting someone in who knows the system and staff is almost priceless

 

[Matt smith]

also in the play-off final if the Luton doesn't slam dunk the ball he's flicked over him and everything is fine

The other centre backs were really good that day remember David

 

[Martin180]

Panzo would be a great permanent addition, clear to see he has a great relationship with Adi too

Its a loan deal being rumoured ?

 

[Martin180]

The other centre backs were really good that day remember David

So you would have played Panzo in the playoff final ?

 

[Matt smith]

Its a loan deal being rumoured ?

Not necessarily, said a loan deal to rangers collapsed but nothing else

if it’s another loan I wouldn’t mind exploring another option admittedly but I’d definitely have him back

 

[Matt smith]

So you would have played Panzo in the playoff final ?

No I wouldn’t have, because Doyle is better

our centre backs got dominated all game