For what it’s worth we are 6th in the xg table.
last season after poor start we were bottom half in actual table but top 6 in this and after more games reverted closer
Aside from the chance against Norwich when Simms was through, have the quality of chances for him been good in the other games we've seen?
I can perhaps remember another header that he got under a little
Simms is very much a confidence player it seems.
The difficult thing is dropping him will presumably only knock is confidence but if he isn't performing then what do you do.
Feels like one of BTA or Norm is close to getting a start soon.
We constantly concede crappy goalsYes last season showed similar, we should be scoring goals basically .. players like simms have to start stepping up
People don't like xg tables but they show a clear underperforming of the players infront of goal
Ironically , the xgA table shows we are conceding somewhat crappy goals too
We constantly concede crappy goals
Unlucky is being nice EvoWell unlucky is the better term
Goal at Bristol should have been disallowed
Deflection v oxford , deflection v norwich
That's 3 of our 5 goals conceded
Think I remember but can't find the footage.He had a half decent chance at Bristol which he did laughably bad with
If his confidence is low it's puzzling why.
He had a very decent 2nd half of the season, scored in an FA cup semi and scored against his old Premiership club pre season.
I think if there's anything at all in the Billing plus cash offer for Simms, I'd have taken it personally. Think we'd have been better for it.Yes last season showed similar, we should be scoring goals basically .. players like simms have to start stepping up
People don't like xg tables but they show a clear underperforming of the players infront of goal
Ironically , the xgA table shows we are conceding somewhat crappy goals too
As we , hopefully, progress with the model this is the point we will come to . Selling an established star but replacing them with better and potentially cash too.I think if there's anything at all in the Billing plus cash offer for Simms, I'd have taken it personally. Think we'd have been better for it.
I say this as someone who stuck up for Simms a lot and was absolutely furious we were persisting with Godden.
Hopeful he rediscovers his touch and holds his value.
Sent from my SM-G973F using Tapatalk
Yeah he has not quite got going this season but tbh the Bristol City chance just didn't sit for him and he ended up shooting, off balence from a rotten angle and Norwich I think the defender timed a nudge perfectly.He had a half decent chance at Bristol which he did laughably bad with
It's very similar to last season's start as regards xg. As bad as we were at the start of last season we were in the top 6-8 as regards xgYeah he has not quite got going this season but tbh the Bristol City chance just didn't sit for him and he ended up shooting, off balence from a rotten angle and Norwich I think the defender timed a nudge perfectly.
I am quite surprised to see us 6th for xg though. Rudoni has missed a couple, Wright and BTA too... and let's not forget xg includes the 4 goals we have scored. Be interesting to see where we are with oxford taken out but the fact that we are playing pretty badly and still creating chances is actually mildly encouraging.
The bulk or maybe half our xG (what is it, like 5.5 or 6 xG?) was in the Oxford game. We struggle to create good quality chances ATM. Lots of nearly moments but the final ball/decision has been lacking.It's very similar to last season's start as regards xg. As bad as we were at the start of last season we were in the top 6-8 as regards xg
I'm not clued up on most data but others suggested that xg is a fairly solid benchmark
The bulk or maybe half our xG (what is it, like 5.5 or 6 xG?) was in the Oxford game. We struggle to create good quality chances ATM. Lots of nearly moments but the final ball/decision has been lacking.
xG is a load of tosh
Middlesbrough got drummed 5-0 off Stoke last week but had a higher Xg...
The xgA table does not surprise me at all. All of our goals have been soft so far. Yes, Bristol’s was a great strike but we gave him acres of space.Yes last season showed similar, we should be scoring goals basically .. players like simms have to start stepping up
People don't like xg tables but they show a clear underperforming of the players infront of goal
Ironically , the xgA table shows we are conceding somewhat crappy goals too
xG is useless if used isolated. It is very valuable for establishing long-term trends.xG is a load of tosh
Middlesbrough got drummed 5-0 off Stoke last week but had a higher Xg...
The xgA table does not surprise me at all. All of our goals have been soft so far. Yes, Bristol’s was a great strike but we gave him acres of space.
I need to rewatch the Norwich goal but in the stand it felt like another soft goal.
In the next games I can see Thomas and Kitching coming back into CB. If we start keeping clean sheets it no longer is a coincidence.
Yes. Even the Oxford goal (first one), Simms was a scapegoat for many on here. If Binks wins a header in the box, it doesn’t lead to Simms poor touch and the goal.There is an issue over falling in those second balls isn't there?
xG is a load of tosh
Middlesbrough got drummed 5-0 off Stoke last week but had a higher Xg...
Not helped by not playing our best 2 CH'sWe constantly concede crappy goals
It’s another argument against crowding our own box at set pieces. At the most basic level, it prevents the keeper from helping to command his area and I have long thought only helps the attacking team’s chances.Yes. Even the Oxford goal (first one), Simms was a scapegoat for many on here. If Binks wins a header in the box, it doesn’t lead to Simms poor touch and the goal.
There’s just too much indecision and/or disorganisation in the box. Ironically, I felt more at ease watching the Bristol cup game than the league game despite us conceding a higher xG in the game we won (0.89 LC v 0.66 on the league).
On the ball, Lati and Binks look cultured and really good, defensively they both look soft. That’s the eye test and the xgA supports that view so far.
As Pep said, the pre-season is over now and the after the international break is when the season really starts.
One outlier there (small data set for this season). I'd imagine the tail end of last season was the same which is a worry. Bad at the back and poor going forward only ends up one way...Overall xG from Opta = 5.48
Stoke - 0.74
Oxford - 2.95
Bristol City - 0.64
Norwich - 1.15
The ‘meta’ seems to be for teams to pack the box with all there players. Not many teams leave anyone up nowadays.It’s another argument against crowding our own box at set pieces. At the most basic level, it prevents the keeper from helping to command his area and I have long thought only helps the attacking team’s chances.
That was a team ethic tbf Fernando!He'd scored once in 9 games at the end of the season to be fair, his form had abandoned him.
The ‘meta’ is that because Pep started doing it and he sets trends. That doesn’t mean we can’t use our eyes or think for ourselves when we see it’s causing us problems at both ends of the pitch.The ‘meta’ seems to be for teams to pack the box with all there players. Not many teams leave anyone up nowadays.
The issue, in my view, was was a failure of organisation. To use an example, if McFadz was playing I’d assume he’d be talking to get people out pushing out.
The worry going into this season is a general lack of leaders in the team outside of Sheaf. The leaders of last season; Sheaf, Kelly, Godden and McFadz have all gone barring Sheaf.
The ‘meta’ is that because Pep started doing it and he sets trends. That doesn’t mean we can’t use our eyes or think for ourselves when we see it’s causing us problems at both ends of the pitch.
Would love to see some more detailed analysis on that without derailing the thread as I remain unconvinced.It’s not a Pep thing, I remember us defending corners this way since Coleman and Boothroyd.
This thing about leaving 1-2 players up top is something the fans feel good about. In reality, the likelihood of clearing the ball and a forward getting onto it and then scoring from it is low.
Keeping everyone back, you have a natural advantage in corners hence the % of goals from corners is very low.
Didn't someone post a stat last season ,when this was discussed for the eleventy billionth time , that less then 2% of corners result in goals across all 4 divisionsWould love to see some more detailed analysis on that without derailing the thread as I remain unconvinced.