Xg table (1 Viewer)

speedie87

Well-Known Member
For what it’s worth we are 6th in the xg table.

last season after poor start we were bottom half in actual table but top 6 in this and after more games reverted closer
 

Evo1883

Well-Known Member
For what it’s worth we are 6th in the xg table.

last season after poor start we were bottom half in actual table but top 6 in this and after more games reverted closer

Yes last season showed similar, we should be scoring goals basically .. players like simms have to start stepping up

People don't like xg tables but they show a clear underperforming of the players infront of goal

Ironically , the xgA table shows we are conceding somewhat crappy goals too
 

PVA

Well-Known Member
Simms is very much a confidence player it seems.

The difficult thing is dropping him will presumably only knock is confidence but if he isn't performing then what do you do.

Feels like one of BTA or Norm is close to getting a start soon.
 

clint van damme

Well-Known Member
Simms is very much a confidence player it seems.

The difficult thing is dropping him will presumably only knock is confidence but if he isn't performing then what do you do.

Feels like one of BTA or Norm is close to getting a start soon.

If his confidence is low it's puzzling why.
He had a very decent 2nd half of the season, scored in an FA cup semi and scored against his old Premiership club pre season.
 

Matt smith

Well-Known Member
Yes last season showed similar, we should be scoring goals basically .. players like simms have to start stepping up

People don't like xg tables but they show a clear underperforming of the players infront of goal

Ironically , the xgA table shows we are conceding somewhat crappy goals too
We constantly concede crappy goals
 

Matt smith

Well-Known Member
Well unlucky is the better term

Goal at Bristol should have been disallowed

Deflection v oxford , deflection v norwich

That's 3 of our 5 goals conceded
Unlucky is being nice Evo

the Oxford and Norwich goals were all woeful defending
 

Mr Panda

Well-Known Member
He had a half decent chance at Bristol which he did laughably bad with
Think I remember but can't find the footage.

I just think with Simms the quality of his chances haven't been that good. If he's fed something like he was in the Carabao cup tie he'll probably put it away. We all know what he can do and the type of goals he scores in the box. It'll be interesting to see how he adapts to the competition up front which he didn't really have last season - he's clearly a confidence player it's somewhat unhelpful for him to be hooked.

We're notoriously slow starters and we can't get him in the game in the first half so it is on him to adapt and find a way to force his presence. I kind of hope Robins benches him next time and brings him on from the 60th minute when it's a little more open and he can get on the end of things and build his confidence. Whilst things aren't clicking everywhere else I feel sorry for him when he's criticised because he does need more bodies around him.
 

TomRad85

Well-Known Member
Yes last season showed similar, we should be scoring goals basically .. players like simms have to start stepping up

People don't like xg tables but they show a clear underperforming of the players infront of goal

Ironically , the xgA table shows we are conceding somewhat crappy goals too
I think if there's anything at all in the Billing plus cash offer for Simms, I'd have taken it personally. Think we'd have been better for it.
I say this as someone who stuck up for Simms a lot and was absolutely furious we were persisting with Godden.
Hopeful he rediscovers his touch and holds his value.

Sent from my SM-G973F using Tapatalk
 

Perennial Lurker

Well-Known Member
I think if there's anything at all in the Billing plus cash offer for Simms, I'd have taken it personally. Think we'd have been better for it.
I say this as someone who stuck up for Simms a lot and was absolutely furious we were persisting with Godden.
Hopeful he rediscovers his touch and holds his value.

Sent from my SM-G973F using Tapatalk
As we , hopefully, progress with the model this is the point we will come to . Selling an established star but replacing them with better and potentially cash too.
The idea from some that we will never or can't sell players is nonsense .
 

Liquid Gold

Well-Known Member
Celebrate Andros Townsend GIF by Everton Football Club
 

The watchmaker

Well-Known Member
He had a half decent chance at Bristol which he did laughably bad with
Yeah he has not quite got going this season but tbh the Bristol City chance just didn't sit for him and he ended up shooting, off balence from a rotten angle and Norwich I think the defender timed a nudge perfectly.

I am quite surprised to see us 6th for xg though. Rudoni has missed a couple, Wright and BTA too... and let's not forget xg includes the 4 goals we have scored. Be interesting to see where we are with oxford taken out but the fact that we are playing pretty badly and still creating chances is actually mildly encouraging.
 

Perennial Lurker

Well-Known Member
Yeah he has not quite got going this season but tbh the Bristol City chance just didn't sit for him and he ended up shooting, off balence from a rotten angle and Norwich I think the defender timed a nudge perfectly.

I am quite surprised to see us 6th for xg though. Rudoni has missed a couple, Wright and BTA too... and let's not forget xg includes the 4 goals we have scored. Be interesting to see where we are with oxford taken out but the fact that we are playing pretty badly and still creating chances is actually mildly encouraging.
It's very similar to last season's start as regards xg. As bad as we were at the start of last season we were in the top 6-8 as regards xg
I'm not clued up on most data but others suggested that xg is a fairly solid benchmark
 

Nuskyblue

Well-Known Member
It's very similar to last season's start as regards xg. As bad as we were at the start of last season we were in the top 6-8 as regards xg
I'm not clued up on most data but others suggested that xg is a fairly solid benchmark
The bulk or maybe half our xG (what is it, like 5.5 or 6 xG?) was in the Oxford game. We struggle to create good quality chances ATM. Lots of nearly moments but the final ball/decision has been lacking.
 

Mucca Mad Boys

Well-Known Member
Yes last season showed similar, we should be scoring goals basically .. players like simms have to start stepping up

People don't like xg tables but they show a clear underperforming of the players infront of goal

Ironically , the xgA table shows we are conceding somewhat crappy goals too
The xgA table does not surprise me at all. All of our goals have been soft so far. Yes, Bristol’s was a great strike but we gave him acres of space.

I need to rewatch the Norwich goal but in the stand it felt like another soft goal.

In the next games I can see Thomas and Kitching coming back into CB. If we start keeping clean sheets it no longer is a coincidence.
 

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
The xgA table does not surprise me at all. All of our goals have been soft so far. Yes, Bristol’s was a great strike but we gave him acres of space.

I need to rewatch the Norwich goal but in the stand it felt like another soft goal.

In the next games I can see Thomas and Kitching coming back into CB. If we start keeping clean sheets it no longer is a coincidence.

There is an issue over falling in those second balls isn't there?
 

Mucca Mad Boys

Well-Known Member
There is an issue over falling in those second balls isn't there?
Yes. Even the Oxford goal (first one), Simms was a scapegoat for many on here. If Binks wins a header in the box, it doesn’t lead to Simms poor touch and the goal.

There’s just too much indecision and/or disorganisation in the box. Ironically, I felt more at ease watching the Bristol cup game than the league game despite us conceding a higher xG in the game we won (0.89 LC v 0.66 on the league).

On the ball, Lati and Binks look cultured and really good, defensively they both look soft. That’s the eye test and the xgA supports that view so far.

As Pep said, the pre-season is over now and the after the international break is when the season really starts.
 

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
Yes. Even the Oxford goal (first one), Simms was a scapegoat for many on here. If Binks wins a header in the box, it doesn’t lead to Simms poor touch and the goal.

There’s just too much indecision and/or disorganisation in the box. Ironically, I felt more at ease watching the Bristol cup game than the league game despite us conceding a higher xG in the game we won (0.89 LC v 0.66 on the league).

On the ball, Lati and Binks look cultured and really good, defensively they both look soft. That’s the eye test and the xgA supports that view so far.

As Pep said, the pre-season is over now and the after the international break is when the season really starts.
It’s another argument against crowding our own box at set pieces. At the most basic level, it prevents the keeper from helping to command his area and I have long thought only helps the attacking team’s chances.
 

Nuskyblue

Well-Known Member
Overall xG from Opta = 5.48

Stoke - 0.74
Oxford - 2.95
Bristol City - 0.64
Norwich - 1.15
One outlier there (small data set for this season). I'd imagine the tail end of last season was the same which is a worry. Bad at the back and poor going forward only ends up one way...

I recall us having more and better chances in the games at the start of last season.
 

Mucca Mad Boys

Well-Known Member
It’s another argument against crowding our own box at set pieces. At the most basic level, it prevents the keeper from helping to command his area and I have long thought only helps the attacking team’s chances.
The ‘meta’ seems to be for teams to pack the box with all there players. Not many teams leave anyone up nowadays.

The issue, in my view, was was a failure of organisation. To use an example, if McFadz was playing I’d assume he’d be talking to get people out pushing out.

The worry going into this season is a general lack of leaders in the team outside of Sheaf. The leaders of last season; Sheaf, Kelly, Godden and McFadz have all gone barring Sheaf.
 

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
The ‘meta’ seems to be for teams to pack the box with all there players. Not many teams leave anyone up nowadays.

The issue, in my view, was was a failure of organisation. To use an example, if McFadz was playing I’d assume he’d be talking to get people out pushing out.

The worry going into this season is a general lack of leaders in the team outside of Sheaf. The leaders of last season; Sheaf, Kelly, Godden and McFadz have all gone barring Sheaf.
The ‘meta’ is that because Pep started doing it and he sets trends. That doesn’t mean we can’t use our eyes or think for ourselves when we see it’s causing us problems at both ends of the pitch.
 

Mucca Mad Boys

Well-Known Member
The ‘meta’ is that because Pep started doing it and he sets trends. That doesn’t mean we can’t use our eyes or think for ourselves when we see it’s causing us problems at both ends of the pitch.

It’s not a Pep thing, I remember us defending corners this way since Coleman and Boothroyd.

This thing about leaving 1-2 players up top is something the fans feel good about. In reality, the likelihood of clearing the ball and a forward getting onto it and then scoring from it is low.

Keeping everyone back, you have a natural advantage in corners hence the % of goals from corners is very low.
 

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
It’s not a Pep thing, I remember us defending corners this way since Coleman and Boothroyd.

This thing about leaving 1-2 players up top is something the fans feel good about. In reality, the likelihood of clearing the ball and a forward getting onto it and then scoring from it is low.

Keeping everyone back, you have a natural advantage in corners hence the % of goals from corners is very low.
Would love to see some more detailed analysis on that without derailing the thread as I remain unconvinced.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top