Trump is my favourite comedian of the year already (16 Viewers)

[Brighton Sky Blue]

Tulsi is an excellent pick. We can of course go through Joes appointments

I’m not sure if you really want to play this game my friend

 

---

[SkyBlueCharlie9]

Tulsi is an excellent pick. We can of course go through Joes appointments

Very clear why a Trump apologist would like her! It aint her mixed race and Hindu religion. Not sure many MAGA would be aware of that AND they dont really like women politicians unless bark raving mad right wingers.
In reality though she has strong links to deals with Russia and Syria... welcome that Como?
You should try researching a bit more before you post..

 

[Brighton Sky Blue]

Such is politics unfortunately

Is it?

 

[SIR ERNIE]

This thread has been such a great read in the last week.

 

[Como]

I watched the Dem TV debates when Old Joe got the nod in 2000 and thought Tulsi was by far the best candidate, she absolutely destroyed Harris btw.

It seemed a big fix when Joe was anointed, nothing new there.

So I listen to NPR and I do not think they have been anyone mentioned so far who has not had a long list of things wrong with them, now I certainly do not know all of them but when the slag off someone like Tulsi, well....

Some of Joe's picks were plain weird but that is what you get to do when you win.

 

[Brighton Sky Blue]

I watched the Dem TV debates when Old Joe got the nod in 2000 and thought Tulsi was by far the best candidate, she absolutely destroyed Harris btw.

It seemed a big fix when Joe was anointed, nothing new there.

So I listen to NPR and I do not think they have been anyone mentioned so far who has not had a long list of things wrong with them, now I certainly do not know all of them but when the slag off someone like Tulsi, well....

Some of Joe's picks were plain weird but that is what you get to do when you win.

Well in 2020 Bernie was the front runner in a crowded field before the Democrat establishment got all the candidates to drop out and endorse Biden just before Super Tuesday. 2016 of course the DNC emails confirming fuckery to ensure Hillary got over the finish line.

You can say what you want, but he simply argues for things that most of the West already do and had similar anti establishment rhetoric to Trump in 2016. As for you on Tulsi Gabbard, I assume you just back whatever Trump decides

 

[Como]

This is the level

 

[Otis]

This is the level

View attachment 39530

As I keep saying, I don't believe anything is real anymore.

So much fake stuff around

 

[chiefdave]

This is the level

View attachment 39530

you know thats a parody account, right?

 

[Sick Boy]

you know thats a parody account, right?

You had to go and ruin it!

 

[The Philosopher]

The Dem’s totally got their strategy wrong. The lawfare against Trump (and it was) made him an underdog to many; the USA has a self-belief of “standing up for the persecuted”. The mugshot image made him a martyr to young “bro culture” males of all races who are usually less inclined to vote. The weird attitude of “academic” liberals to patronise those they see as less enlightened as being easily manipulated by Trump.

The people rejected:
-Biological men in women’s sports.
-Illegal immigration (try getting a green card as a UK citizen. Wokies: it’s not equality to jump the queue and claim asylum. Real asylum is fine of course.)
-Blackrock driven foreign wars
-Biden and Pelosi et al’s questionable wealth
-Being talked to like children by the woke literati.

The liberal sneering is ugly. People don’t like it.

 

[The Philosopher]

What could ever go wrong having an anti-vax activist as health secretary?

He’s not anti-vax.

To say something like:

“we do not know the long term implications of vaping” is ok. Apparently.

“we do not know the long term implications of an untested vaccine” is anti-vax?

RFK has stated repeatedly that he will not take vaccines away.

A couple of years ago, to suggest that the Wuhan lab was the source of the virus made you a “racist conspiracy theorist”.

 

[shmmeee]

He’s not anti-vax.

To say something like:

“we do not know the long term implications of vaping” is ok. Apparently.

“we do not know the long term implications of an untested vaccine” is anti-vax?

RFK has stated repeatedly that he will not take vaccines away.

A couple of years ago, to suggest that the Wuhan lab was the source of the virus made you a “racist conspiracy theorist”.

Because the vaccine is tested and saying it isn’t is misinformation designed to whip up fear uncertainty and doubt about vaccines.

 

[Brighton Sky Blue]

The Dem’s totally got their strategy wrong. The lawfare against Trump (and it was) made him an underdog to many; the USA has a self-belief of “standing up for the persecuted”. The mugshot image made him a martyr to young “bro culture” males of all races who are usually less inclined to vote. The weird attitude of “academic” liberals to patronise those they see as less enlightened as being easily manipulated by Trump.

The people rejected:
-Biological men in women’s sports.
-Illegal immigration (try getting a green card as a UK citizen. Wokies: it’s not equality to jump the queue and claim asylum. Real asylum is fine of course.)
-Blackrock driven foreign wars
-Biden and Pelosi et al’s questionable wealth
-Being talked to like children by the woke literati.

The liberal sneering is ugly. People don’t like it.

Yes I forgot that Kamala Harris ran on getting men to play in women’s sports.

 

[The Philosopher]

Because the vaccine is tested and saying it isn’t is misinformation designed to whip up fear uncertainty and doubt about vaccines.

Which bit of “long term implications” confused you to write the above?

 

[Brighton Sky Blue]

Which bit of “long term implications” confused you to write the above?

Is this where we repeat the exercise of going through the peer reviewed data concerning tens of millions of vaccine jabs compared to catching COVID?

Thank fuck you weren’t elected to Parliament

 

[Como]

Yes I forgot that Kamala Harris ran on getting men to play in women’s sports.

 

[shmmeee]

Which bit of “long term implications” confused you to write the above?

Which bit of “all active elements of a vaccine leave the body within months” is doing it for you?

 

[The Philosopher]

Is this where we repeat the exercise of going through the peer reviewed data concerning tens of millions of vaccine jabs compared to catching COVID?

Thank fuck you weren’t elected to Parliament

I believe it reduces the symptoms, not that it stops you catching it or being able to spread it.

NHS seems to confirm this.

COVID-19 vaccine

NHS information about the COVID-19 vaccine, including what the vaccine helps protect against, who should have it and when, how to get it and side effects.

www.nhs.uk

There was dangerous misinformation that the jabs stopped people “catching COVID” that probably resulted in increased deaths.

These people were really stupid.

Please read what you’ve written.

 

[shmmeee]

I believe it reduces the symptoms, not that it stops you catching it or being able to spread it.

NHS seems to confirm this.

COVID-19 vaccine

NHS information about the COVID-19 vaccine, including what the vaccine helps protect against, who should have it and when, how to get it and side effects.

www.nhs.uk

There was dangerous misinformation that the jabs stopped people “catching COVID” that probably resulted in increased deaths.

These people were really stupid.

Please read what you’ve written.

Do you have the first clue what vaccines are or how they work?

 

[Brighton Sky Blue]

Oh shit. ‘I would legislate to allow men in women’s sports’.

You got me there.

 

[The Philosopher]

I guess the lefty apologists don’t think that they do any sport in prison.

 

[shmmeee]

Oh shit. ‘I would legislate to allow men in women’s sports’.

You got me there.

Posted 2019

 

[Brighton Sky Blue]

I believe it reduces the symptoms, not that it stops you catching it or being able to spread it.

NHS seems to confirm this.

COVID-19 vaccine

NHS information about the COVID-19 vaccine, including what the vaccine helps protect against, who should have it and when, how to get it and side effects.

www.nhs.uk

There was dangerous misinformation that the jabs stopped people “catching COVID” that probably resulted in increased deaths.

These people were really stupid.

Please read what you’ve written.

You’re a complete and utter dumbass.

 

[Brighton Sky Blue]

Posted 2019

No no, I take it back. In order to win at the women’s prison table tennis championships, men will get their sex changed to take the jackpot.

 

[The Philosopher]

Do you have the first clue what vaccines are or how they work?

Yes, they train the immune system to identify and fight the virus. They don’t necessarily stop the spread. To say they do is a bit stupid.

We don’t know if there are long term side effects. Some say there are. We need to monitor and weigh up the result long term.

Fairly straightforward.

PS. Trump won.

 

[shmmeee]

No no, I take it back. In order to win at the women’s prison table tennis championships, men will get their sex changed to take the jackpot.

I think there’s a much more nefarious reason transition rates are so much higher in the male prison population, so not sure pulling at this thread is wise tbh.

 

[shmmeee]

Yes, they train the immune system to identify and fight the virus. They don’t necessarily stop the spread. To say they do is a bit stupid.

We don’t know if there are long term side effects. Some say there are. We need to monitor and weigh up the result long term.

Fairly straightforward.

PS. Trump won.

How to viruses spread? What is viral load?

As much as you may wish otherwise Trump winning doesn’t change what we know about virology.

 

[Brighton Sky Blue]

I think there’s a much more nefarious reason transition rates are so much higher in the male prison population, so not sure pulling at this thread is wise tbh.

Say what it is then.

 

[shmmeee]

Say what it is then.

Well either trans women are more likely to be offenders or far more likely prisoners are more likely to abuse a loophole when they see one for better treatment/access to vulnerable prisoners.

 

[The Philosopher]

I think there’s a much more nefarious reason transition rates are so much higher in the male prison population, so not sure pulling at this thread is wise tbh.

Men in women’s prisons? It’s a no from me. Men in women’s changing rooms? No from me. Boys in girls changing rooms? Again no.

Dem’s and dem supporters who defend all this?

Each to their own, but no.

 

[shmmeee]

Men in women’s prisons? It’s a no from me. Men in women’s changing rooms? No from me. Boys in girls changing rooms? Again no.

Dem’s and dem supporters who defend all this?

Each to their own, but no.

I think sex matters in some contexts and very much doesn’t in others.

 

[The Philosopher]

Well either trans women are more likely to be offenders or far more likely prisoners are more likely to abuse a loophole when they see one for better treatment/access to vulnerable prisoners.

That’s sensible analysis. Unfortunately, probably makes you a fascist for saying so.

 

[Brighton Sky Blue]

Well either trans women are more likely to be offenders or far more likely prisoners are more likely to abuse a loophole when they see one for better treatment/access to vulnerable prisoners.

And if we see a big queue of people willing to undergo life changing surgery to do this then we can have the conversation.

There’s still nothing in there about Harris demanding men be allowed to compete in women’s sports though. Strange to die on the Philosopher’s hill but yes crack on.

 

[shmmeee]

That’s sensible analysis. Unfortunately, probably makes you a fascist for saying so.

I am a well known transphobe already sadly. And I genuinely say sadly because we lost a damn good trans poster because of this discussion. But I think the left telling obvious lies to support their instinct for not being an arsehole to vulnerable people costs far more than it gains.