Trump is my favourite comedian of the year already (4 Viewers)

SkyBlueCharlie9

Well-Known Member
Tulsi is an excellent pick. We can of course go through Joes appointments
Very clear why a Trump apologist would like her! It aint her mixed race and Hindu religion. Not sure many MAGA would be aware of that AND they dont really like women politicians unless bark raving mad right wingers.
In reality though she has strong links to deals with Russia and Syria... welcome that Como?
You should try researching a bit more before you post..
 

SIR ERNIE

Well-Known Member
This thread has been such a great read in the last week. 🤣
 

Como

Well-Known Member
I watched the Dem TV debates when Old Joe got the nod in 2000 and thought Tulsi was by far the best candidate, she absolutely destroyed Harris btw.

It seemed a big fix when Joe was anointed, nothing new there.

So I listen to NPR and I do not think they have been anyone mentioned so far who has not had a long list of things wrong with them, now I certainly do not know all of them but when the slag off someone like Tulsi, well....

Some of Joe's picks were plain weird but that is what you get to do when you win.
 

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
I watched the Dem TV debates when Old Joe got the nod in 2000 and thought Tulsi was by far the best candidate, she absolutely destroyed Harris btw.

It seemed a big fix when Joe was anointed, nothing new there.

So I listen to NPR and I do not think they have been anyone mentioned so far who has not had a long list of things wrong with them, now I certainly do not know all of them but when the slag off someone like Tulsi, well....

Some of Joe's picks were plain weird but that is what you get to do when you win.
Well in 2020 Bernie was the front runner in a crowded field before the Democrat establishment got all the candidates to drop out and endorse Biden just before Super Tuesday. 2016 of course the DNC emails confirming fuckery to ensure Hillary got over the finish line.

You can say what you want, but he simply argues for things that most of the West already do and had similar anti establishment rhetoric to Trump in 2016. As for you on Tulsi Gabbard, I assume you just back whatever Trump decides
 

The Philosopher

Well-Known Member
The Dem’s totally got their strategy wrong. The lawfare against Trump (and it was) made him an underdog to many; the USA has a self-belief of “standing up for the persecuted”. The mugshot image made him a martyr to young “bro culture” males of all races who are usually less inclined to vote. The weird attitude of “academic” liberals to patronise those they see as less enlightened as being easily manipulated by Trump.

The people rejected:
-Biological men in women’s sports.
-Illegal immigration (try getting a green card as a UK citizen. Wokies: it’s not equality to jump the queue and claim asylum. Real asylum is fine of course.)
-Blackrock driven foreign wars
-Biden and Pelosi et al’s questionable wealth
-Being talked to like children by the woke literati.

The liberal sneering is ugly. People don’t like it.
 

The Philosopher

Well-Known Member
What could ever go wrong having an anti-vax activist as health secretary?
He’s not anti-vax.

To say something like:

“we do not know the long term implications of vaping” is ok. Apparently.

“we do not know the long term implications of an untested vaccine” is anti-vax?

RFK has stated repeatedly that he will not take vaccines away.

A couple of years ago, to suggest that the Wuhan lab was the source of the virus made you a “racist conspiracy theorist”.
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
He’s not anti-vax.

To say something like:

“we do not know the long term implications of vaping” is ok. Apparently.

“we do not know the long term implications of an untested vaccine” is anti-vax?

RFK has stated repeatedly that he will not take vaccines away.

A couple of years ago, to suggest that the Wuhan lab was the source of the virus made you a “racist conspiracy theorist”.

Because the vaccine is tested and saying it isn’t is misinformation designed to whip up fear uncertainty and doubt about vaccines.
 

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
The Dem’s totally got their strategy wrong. The lawfare against Trump (and it was) made him an underdog to many; the USA has a self-belief of “standing up for the persecuted”. The mugshot image made him a martyr to young “bro culture” males of all races who are usually less inclined to vote. The weird attitude of “academic” liberals to patronise those they see as less enlightened as being easily manipulated by Trump.

The people rejected:
-Biological men in women’s sports.
-Illegal immigration (try getting a green card as a UK citizen. Wokies: it’s not equality to jump the queue and claim asylum. Real asylum is fine of course.)
-Blackrock driven foreign wars
-Biden and Pelosi et al’s questionable wealth
-Being talked to like children by the woke literati.

The liberal sneering is ugly. People don’t like it.
Yes I forgot that Kamala Harris ran on getting men to play in women’s sports.
 

The Philosopher

Well-Known Member
Is this where we repeat the exercise of going through the peer reviewed data concerning tens of millions of vaccine jabs compared to catching COVID?

Thank fuck you weren’t elected to Parliament

I believe it reduces the symptoms, not that it stops you catching it or being able to spread it.

NHS seems to confirm this.


There was dangerous misinformation that the jabs stopped people “catching COVID” that probably resulted in increased deaths.

These people were really stupid.

Please read what you’ve written. 😂
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
I believe it reduces the symptoms, not that it stops you catching it or being able to spread it.

NHS seems to confirm this.


There was dangerous misinformation that the jabs stopped people “catching COVID” that probably resulted in increased deaths.

These people were really stupid.

Please read what you’ve written. 😂

Do you have the first clue what vaccines are or how they work?
 

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
I believe it reduces the symptoms, not that it stops you catching it or being able to spread it.

NHS seems to confirm this.


There was dangerous misinformation that the jabs stopped people “catching COVID” that probably resulted in increased deaths.

These people were really stupid.

Please read what you’ve written. 😂
You’re a complete and utter dumbass.
 

The Philosopher

Well-Known Member
Do you have the first clue what vaccines are or how they work?
Yes, they train the immune system to identify and fight the virus. They don’t necessarily stop the spread. To say they do is a bit stupid.

We don’t know if there are long term side effects. Some say there are. We need to monitor and weigh up the result long term.

Fairly straightforward.

PS. Trump won.
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
No no, I take it back. In order to win at the women’s prison table tennis championships, men will get their sex changed to take the jackpot.

I think there’s a much more nefarious reason transition rates are so much higher in the male prison population, so not sure pulling at this thread is wise tbh.
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
Yes, they train the immune system to identify and fight the virus. They don’t necessarily stop the spread. To say they do is a bit stupid.

We don’t know if there are long term side effects. Some say there are. We need to monitor and weigh up the result long term.

Fairly straightforward.

PS. Trump won.

How to viruses spread? What is viral load?

As much as you may wish otherwise Trump winning doesn’t change what we know about virology.
 

The Philosopher

Well-Known Member
I think there’s a much more nefarious reason transition rates are so much higher in the male prison population, so not sure pulling at this thread is wise tbh.
Men in women’s prisons? It’s a no from me. Men in women’s changing rooms? No from me. Boys in girls changing rooms? Again no.

Dem’s and dem supporters who defend all this?

Each to their own, but no.
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
Men in women’s prisons? It’s a no from me. Men in women’s changing rooms? No from me. Boys in girls changing rooms? Again no.

Dem’s and dem supporters who defend all this?

Each to their own, but no.

I think sex matters in some contexts and very much doesn’t in others.
 

The Philosopher

Well-Known Member
Well either trans women are more likely to be offenders or far more likely prisoners are more likely to abuse a loophole when they see one for better treatment/access to vulnerable prisoners.
That’s sensible analysis. Unfortunately, probably makes you a fascist for saying so.
 

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
Well either trans women are more likely to be offenders or far more likely prisoners are more likely to abuse a loophole when they see one for better treatment/access to vulnerable prisoners.
And if we see a big queue of people willing to undergo life changing surgery to do this then we can have the conversation.

There’s still nothing in there about Harris demanding men be allowed to compete in women’s sports though. Strange to die on the Philosopher’s hill but yes crack on.
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
That’s sensible analysis. Unfortunately, probably makes you a fascist for saying so.

I am a well known transphobe already sadly. And I genuinely say sadly because we lost a damn good trans poster because of this discussion. But I think the left telling obvious lies to support their instinct for not being an arsehole to vulnerable people costs far more than it gains.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top