Do you want to discuss boring politics? (41 Viewers)

Grendel

Well-Known Member
South Korea’s president having a really normal one.

I don’t get it tbh - I know he has a lot of corruption allegations but a very stable country doesn’t have martial law
 

Philosoraptor

Well-Known Member
All kicking off in South Korea.

Either there has been an incursion from the North or we have some crazies in charge,
 

MalcSB

Well-Known Member
Is it because it invokes farts Malc?
Although described in the headline as a flatulence tax, I read elsewhere its cows burping which releases the methane.(I was reading up about Bovaer which is an additive to animal food which reduces methane output and has caused a bit of controversy).

It just made me laugh wondering where this could logically end up. An additional tax on baked beans perhaps.And statins.

And yes, partly because it looks like it involves farts, which can be funny at times, have you ever seen Blazing Saddles?

Puerile I know.

 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
Although described in the headline as a flatulence tax, I read elsewhere its cows burping which releases the methane.(I was reading up about Bovaer which is an additive to animal food which reduces methane output and has caused a bit of controversy).

It just made me laugh wondering where this could logically end up. An additional tax on baked beans perhaps.And statins.

And yes, partly because it looks like it involves farts, which can be funny at times, have you ever seen Blazing Saddles?

Puerile I know.

Farts are funny. I’m agnostic on methane tax. Not really looked into exactly how much of an issue it is. I liked the story I read about pants for cows to filter it out. Much more my kind of solution.
 

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
I was reading up about Bovaer which is an additive to animal food which reduces methane output and has caused a bit of controversy
Think I'm missing something on this story as I have no idea why it is controversial. Do people not realize how many chemicals are involved in industrial farming these days, not like this is the first time they've been used.

From what I've read it does zero harm to the animal and doesn't affect the milk so what exactly are people getting upset about?
 

MalcSB

Well-Known Member
Think I'm missing something on this story as I have no idea why it is controversial. Do people not realize how many chemicals are involved in industrial farming these days, not like this is the first time they've been used.

From what I've read it does zero harm to the animal and doesn't affect the milk so what exactly are people getting upset about?
It is the anti additive lobby. They don’t believe that this stuff doesn’t get in to the milk and the extremists think it’s part of a Bill Gates conspiracy to reduce the world’s population - which would also reduce CO2 emissions.

Probably the same people who don’t believe In COVID or are / were anti vaxers.
 

Sky Blue Pete

Well-Known Member
It is the anti additive lobby. They don’t believe that this stuff doesn’t get in to the milk and the extremists think it’s part of a Bill Gates conspiracy to reduce the world’s population - which would also reduce CO2 emissions.

Probably the same people who don’t believe In COVID or are / were anti vaxers.
So most reform voters then
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
It is the anti additive lobby. They don’t believe that this stuff doesn’t get in to the milk and the extremists think it’s part of a Bill Gates conspiracy to reduce the world’s population - which would also reduce CO2 emissions.

Probably the same people who don’t believe In COVID or are / were anti vaxers.

The raw milk lot. Like this fella:

 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
Can I also point out that’s there’s very clearly a full fat milk jug missing from next to the semi ski….

WHY THE FUCK IS THIS A CONVERSATION WE ARE HAVING IN A POLITICS THREAD WHAT THE EVER LIVING FUCK IS GOING ON?
 

MalcSB

Well-Known Member
Can I also point out that’s there’s very clearly a full fat milk jug missing from next to the semi ski….

WHY THE FUCK IS THIS A CONVERSATION WE ARE HAVING IN A POLITICS THREAD WHAT THE EVER LIVING FUCK IS GOING ON?
You started it by posting the video😀

Normal service now resumed,

 

MalcSB

Well-Known Member
All this discussing milk stuff really follows on from the “we won’t tell you how to live your lives“ party suggesting banning porridge ads before 9pm.

Haven't they got anything better to do?
 

wingy

Well-Known Member
For something that keeps or can aid the lowering of cholesterol seems a little odd,and can keep you going all morning it would make a strange object to jump on,advertisements, don't we all subscribe to do away with them anyway?
 

MalcSB

Well-Known Member
For something that keeps or can aid the lowering of cholesterol seems a little odd,and can keep you going all morning it would make a strange object to jump on,advertisements, don't we all subscribe to do away with them anyway?
I bought some so called plain porridge oats this morning and just had to check. Surprisingly, 1% more sugars than in the sweetened variety. My muesli had even more, It’s the dried fruit that’s the problem with that.And I thought muesli was a healthier option😟
 

MalcSB

Well-Known Member
Banning TV ads in the days of YouTube seems a little silly. The coverage is ludicrous, porridge ads aren’t banned for example, but still.
I am sure it offends the very core of your being to open Daily Mail online, so this is a copy and paste

”The Government's new ultra-strict ban on junk food advertising has sparked outrage on social media, with many rallying against the 'confusing' rules that list foods like porridge, muesli and some yoghurts as unhealthy.

These products will be banned from commercials that air before 9pm on television, and axed online ads completely.”
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top