MalcSB
Well-Known Member
Was it her decision? Ministers have not taken up their full salaries in the past in recognition of the “optics” of certain situations.Isn’t it? Should MPs not take up expenses if they’ve made an unpopular decision? What’s the rule you’re proposing here.
It’s the size of monthly payment as well, £350. So each month is more than a WFP for a pensioner, and the annual total of £4,200 is over twice the average for a 3 bedroomed house, and she’s not even there all the time. Is it another fucking mansion she’s got in her constituency?
I don’t think there is a rule requiring MPs to live in their constituency. If they need to be there for work reasons, a hotel or return go London by train should be the allowable expense.