USSR invades Ukraine. (6 Viewers)

Sick Boy

Super Moderator
Playing devils advocate here, but why do we think we can fire a missile at him and not expect a response?
It would be the beginning of the end of him. It would be a different story though if missiles were actually launched by the USA rather than Ukraine.
 

  • Like
Reactions: AOM

PVA

Well-Known Member

Happy We Did It GIF by NETFLIX
 

PVA

Well-Known Member
Playing devils advocate here, but why do we think we can fire a missile at him and not expect a response?

We haven't fired it - we have supplied weapons, as we have done throughout the war. Western weapons have killed thousands of Russian soldiers already.

British weapons are used all over the world by other countries, we aren't at war with each country on the end of them (thankfully!)
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
If you actually listen to what he's saying here, this is terrifying. Basically military bases in NATO countries are now legitimate targets for attack.
Lets hope he's bluffing, because if not it wouldn't be beyond the realms of fantasy for the UK or US to be attacked tonight



With love mate. Are you serious? If you are. Don’t be. Russia have been threatening to nuke the UK for ages on domestic TV. They do it every week. They won’t because the second the attack NATO they’d be vaporised and Putin would be dead.
 

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
Putin would be dead.
well there's some people who believe he is very ill and on the way out anyway so not entirely sure its wise to be seen to be provoking him even if we do believe its all empty threats.

he hardly seem the most stable and rational person, not sure I want survival relying on some lunatic not thinking I'm on the way out so I'll take everyone else with me!
 

bigfatronssba

Well-Known Member
It would be the beginning of the end of him. It would be a different story though if missiles were actually launched by the USA rather than Ukraine.

Who’s operating them? It’s not very clear
 

bigfatronssba

Well-Known Member
With love mate. Are you serious? If you are. Don’t be. Russia have been threatening to nuke the UK for ages on domestic TV. They do it every week. They won’t because the second the attack NATO they’d be vaporised and Putin would be dead.

An attack doesn’t necessarily mean Nuclear.

And anyway, he launched an ICBM the other day. NATO/America would’ve detected its launch. They wouldn’t have known it was only carrying a conventional bomb, rather than a nuclear warhead for which it was designed.

The initial reaction was to do nothing
 

PVA

Well-Known Member
An attack doesn’t necessarily mean Nuclear.

And anyway, he launched an ICBM the other day. NATO/America would’ve detected its launch. They wouldn’t have known it was only carrying a conventional bomb, rather than a nuclear warhead for which it was designed.

The initial reaction was to do nothing

Technically it wasn't an ICBM, it was an Intermediate Range Ballistic Missile and Russia informed the US of the launch. And it wasn't even carrying a conventional bomb - it was basically carrying fireworks!

It was pure sabre rattling from Putin, again. It's kind of worked I guess as a lot of people seem convinced we're now on the brink of nuclear war, but we are no closer.

It was a very expensive $50m launch of something they apparently have a very low stock of just to show his audience at home and admirers around the world that he's a big strong tough man.
 

MalcSB

Well-Known Member
An attack doesn’t necessarily mean Nuclear.

And anyway, he launched an ICBM the other day. NATO/America would’ve detected its launch. They wouldn’t have known it was only carrying a conventional bomb, rather than a nuclear warhead for which it was designed.

The initial reaction was to do nothing
They probably could work out where it was heading.
 

BackRoomRummermill

Well-Known Member
Any conflict with Russia would around while before it became Nuclear - either way nothing will happen - China is pullling the strings and XI is not too happy with Putin
 

PVA

Well-Known Member
"Russia's "meat-grinder" tactics, the ISW says, mean that Moscow is losing more than 50 soldiers for each square kilometre of captured territory."

Absolutely astonishing statistic. What a pointless waste of life. If only the people of Russia knew the reality of what is happening.



 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
Interesting commentary on BBC news that Russia advancement is continuing

Ukraine view that Biden has been supplying enough arms to keep the war going but will not let them ever win - just keep death going (well I never)

Biden I didn’t realise last month was furious they wouldn’t enforce conscription of 18 year olds in Ukraine.

 

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
Interesting commentary on BBC news that Russia advancement is continuing

Ukraine view that Biden has been supplying enough arms to keep the war going but will not let them ever win - just keep death going (well I never)

Biden I didn’t realise last month was furious they wouldn’t enforce conscription of 18 year olds in Ukraine.

I’m sure if he did lend the materiel necessary for Ukraine to win you would be the first to criticise him for escalation. Don’t worry, Daddy Trump will be in soon to make Ukraine sign over land to Putin.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
I’m sure if he did lend the materiel necessary for Ukraine to win you would be the first to criticise him for escalation. Don’t worry, Daddy Trump will be in soon to make Ukraine sign over land to Putin.

It will in the end save lives and the Biden administration was always focused on prolonging the war
 

skybluetony176

Well-Known Member
About the only thing that actually prevents Putin going back in to finish the job later.
Saw a report the other day that Trumps Russia/Ukraines envoy has suggested that Trump’s roadmap to peace requires an immediate ceasefire, a continuation of arming Ukraine, never ending negotiations on occupied territories and Ukraine being allowed to join NATO in ten years. It sounds like Trump is looking to just kick the can down the road.
 

Sick Boy

Super Moderator
Saw a report the other day that Trumps Russia/Ukraines envoy has suggested that Trump’s roadmap to peace requires an immediate ceasefire, a continuation of arming Ukraine, never ending negotiations on occupied territories and Ukraine being allowed to join NATO in ten years. It sounds like Trump is looking to just kick the can down the road.
It’s inevitable that Russia will keep the occupied territories with some kind of agreement than an attempt to take more would result in Russia essentially declaring war on America.
 

skybluetony176

Well-Known Member
It’s inevitable that Russia will keep the occupied territories with some kind of agreement than an attempt to take more would result in Russia essentially declaring war on America.
What about the territory Ukraine now occupies in Russia? There’s going to have to be a reason to hand that back so an exchange of territory to some degree is more likely.

The other interesting thing Trumps envoy was apparently saying was that there would have to be a premium on Russian oil to go to a rebuild fund for Ukraine.

It really doesn’t sound like Trump has a solution either as it’s hard to envisage Putin agreeing to NATO membership or compensation, before you even get into a continuation of the West arming Ukraine.

Sorry but the suggestion that Putin would be happy with obtaining what is essentially a bombed out, desolate waste land as a win while achieving nothing of his stated aims in the first place seems unlikely. Read between the lines and Trump only seems interested pausing the problem while he completes his second term, he’s not really come up with a solution to the problem unless he has some secret plan he’s not told anyone about. It’s got all the hallmarks of Nixons plan to stop the Vietnam war.
 

wingy

Well-Known Member
What about the territory Ukraine now occupies in Russia? There’s going to have to be a reason to hand that back so an exchange of territory to some degree is more likely.

The other interesting thing Trumps envoy was apparently saying was that there would have to be a premium on Russian oil to go to a rebuild fund for Ukraine.

It really doesn’t sound like Trump has a solution either as it’s hard to envisage Putin agreeing to NATO membership or compensation, before you even get into a continuation of the West arming Ukraine.

Sorry but the suggestion that Putin would be happy with obtaining what is essentially a bombed out, desolate waste land as a win while achieving nothing of his stated aims in the first place seems unlikely. Read between the lines and Trump only seems interested pausing the problem while he completes his second term, he’s not really come up with a solution to the problem unless he has some secret plan he’s not told anyone about. It’s got all the hallmarks of Nixons plan to stop the Vietnam war.
So do the reparations from oil and energy or whatever bring an increase in cost to all of,I can see him being a fan of that?
 

MalcSB

Well-Known Member
With love mate. Are you serious? If you are. Don’t be. Russia have been threatening to nuke the UK for ages on domestic TV. They do it every week. They won’t because the second the attack NATO they’d be vaporised and Putin would be dead.
Phew, dodged it then.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
I see Russia has already rejected Trump’s proposals for peace with Ukraine out of hand.

The Ukrainians want the war to end - it should have ended years ago
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member

Users who are viewing this thread

Top