Grendel
Well-Known Member
But not on the very thing we are discussing.
Or do they only have to pay tax on some things and pay no tax on other things because...they're rich?
Did you go to a non selective comp?
But not on the very thing we are discussing.
Or do they only have to pay tax on some things and pay no tax on other things because...they're rich?
I mean I did go to one but yes you crack onIt's jealousy and I doubt many have even been in a normal private school
Did you go to a non selective comp?
You've got this weird obsession with my background, my upbringing and my parents. Like fuck am I telling you any more.
oh dear Tarquin - hypocrite alert.
I didn't go to private school.
Not actually what I asked
And I told you I'm not giving you any more information on my background because you're a creepy weirdo.
1. Again, it's weird that you already know what school I went to
2. What difference does it make, it's not like I was campaigning for VAT on private school fees when I was 11 years old nor did I have any say in what school I went to
Of course you do.
Well Starmer still had a freebie in a private school - most people in private schools aren’t rich - the education minister is a cretin and Starmer just a man who will take all that comes to him and play the socialist card when it suits
Just garbled rambling nonsense.
As usual you've got zero point other than some sort of dig at my upbringing.
London Mayor Sadiq Khan has received a knighthood, one among a number of politicians named in the New Year Honours list.
Senior Conservatives labelled the three-time mayor's knighthood as a "reward for failure".
Also on the honours list are former Conservative West Midlands Mayor Andy Street and Nick Gibb, the former long-serving schools minister.
No my point is most people who send children to private school are not rich - a claim you made
This made me laugh, hello pot, meet kettle.
Private schools are not meritocratic or academically selective to anywhere near the same extent as a grammar as you well know of course.No it’s because it will expose you as someone who’s benefited from a selective system. I openly admit mine all went as the comp was a dump. I could have having passed the 11 plus but no one else in my school did.
I like Bridget PhillipsonWell Starmer still had a freebie in a private school - most people in private schools aren’t rich - the education minister is a cretin and Starmer just a man who will take all that comes to him and play the socialist card when it suits
As someone who works in the profession I sadly think she’s full of shit.I like Bridget Phillipson
Why’s that?As someone who works in the profession I sadly think she’s full of shit.
The nation's gold how much of it were you entitled to? Honestly, the nation is not a household and does not need to sell bonds, gold or anything else to raise £.How much of the nations gold did Brown sell at a rock bottom price? Mate.
Labour ideology only really works if they have got enough of someone else’s family silver to sell to pay the bills.
once the rich get fed up with that, they will do what they did before and fuck off abroad, taking their tax liabilities with them and funding some other nations debt.
As the nation is not a household, tell the government to fuck off and leave my income for me manage and use then. Fuck collectivism Which seems like a one way street to me. Why should anyone else me entitled to any of my income?The nation's gold how much of it were you entitled to? Honestly, the nation is not a household and does not need to sell bonds, gold or anything else to raise £.
AlwaysAs the nation is not a household, tell the government to fuck off and leave my income for me manage and use then. Fuck collectivism Which seems like a one way street to me. Why should anyone else me entitled to any of my income?
The Nation‘s assets‘ could and should have been better managed and utilised for the nation’s and citizens benefit By governments of all political persuasions.
A couple of things.I see energy prices are going to be heading in the opposite direction to those promised by the Labour government.
Fan fucking tastic. Conned and lied to again by a bunch of charlatans.
Energy price cap: Bills rise with warnings of more pain ahead
The new year starts with a 1% increase in domestic gas and electricity prices under Ofgem's price cap.www.bbc.co.uk
Her claims around the reform of OFSTED for example are nothing but cosmetic. The one word overall ‘judgment’ doesn’t appear on a website as a header, but the same judgements by category are still there.Why’s that?
Pip?get compensated for PPI misspelling
Only a cut if real terms pay rises are greater than 1% across the board.A couple of things.
You’ve been hyped up on a pledge dating back to 2022 where Labour said that if they were in government they’d have fixed the rate for the upcoming winter period into 2023 at an average of £1970.00. They didn’t make that pledge in their election manifesto so no one lied to you other than various Tories who have been doing the rounds claiming otherwise, specifically referring back to that pledge. You’re getting wound up over a lie. Don’t believe me? Here’s a conservative backed think tank telling you that the Tories are lying to you
Claims Labour pledged to freeze energy bills appears to refer to old policy - Full Fact
Labour pledged to keep energy bills frozen in response to rising prices in 2022. It did not make any such promise in its recent election manifesto.fullfact.org
Secondly as the article you linked tells you the raise is 1%. Inflation is currently running at 2.6%. This is a below inflation rate and if you want to be pedantic about it that means in real terms it is a cut. Also worth pointing out that this keeps the price cap below half of what it peaked at under the tories.
So in essence, you are being conned and lied to by a bunch of charlatans. You just don’t seem to understand who the charlatans are in this case.
Hoorah.How encouraging
Starmer hails 'year of change' as he delivers first New Year message as prime minister, with plan for 'more cash in your pocket' in 2025
Almost six months into the Labour leader's time in Downing Street, the prime minister is battling criticisms of his party's management of the economy and the direction he is taking the country.news.sky.com
This whole “it’s about the kids” line doesn’t add up. The money raised from the VAT on private education has been pledged to go directly into state education. There’s just over 10 million children in state education, there’s about 500k in private (around 6 percent of who are foreign). If it’s about “the kid’s” then surely you should support this policy. An extra estimated £1.5 billion into state education on 10 million children vs tax breaks for the parents of 500k in private education some of who aren’t even UK citizens so tax breaks to foreigners.