Point I’ve been making on different match threads and been accused of being anti Lampard, is; what is the difference?
Lack of subs, lack of adapting to games, same impassioned poor performances, lack of togetherness, at times lack of game plan - or at least it appears that way.
I want Lampard to do well, but appointing a new manager surely means we don’t see the same things we did with the one deemed not good enough?
Not his players and he’s likely inherited a poor atmosphere, but it’s his role to change the latter and get the most from the former.
Not anti Lampard, I don’t want him to fail but we’re not seeing the Elite Tactician DK was clear he wanted.
He clearly needs time, but games like today and Portsmouth are concerning.