Pato (23 Viewers)

SBT

Well-Known Member
His fitness could be at any level, you have no idea?

If he's been training with us for a week then the staff will have a good idea though.
I mean none of us have seen his scans, have we?

Obviously if Lampard and co think he's got something to offer then maybe we offer him a contract - I'm not expecting an immediate contribution if we do though, that's for sure
 

Nick

Administrator
I mean none of us have seen his scans, have we?

Obviously if Lampard and co think he's got something to offer then maybe we offer him a contract - I'm not expecting an immediate contribution if we do though, that's for sure

Exactly, hence you can't really say he didn't play because he was unfit etc etc.

We have no idea in reality, he could have a Jamie Allen style engine or he could be a Rooney where he looks at a burger and puts on 4 stone.
 

SBT

Well-Known Member
Exactly, hence you can't really say he didn't play because he was unfit etc etc.

We have no idea in reality, he could have a Jamie Allen style engine or he could be a Rooney where he looks at a burger and puts on 4 stone.
Why do you think he couldn't get a game at Charlotte?
 

edgy

Well-Known Member
Just done a bit of lunchtime googling. It appears J-Patz has been playing for a team called Crown Legacy FC as well as Charlotte. I think they play in a development/reserves league.
 

KenilworthSkyBlue

Well-Known Member
The MLS is a pretty decent standard of league these days. The name of Charlotte's junior team doesn't really change that.

It really isn't. It's still very much a retirement league that attracts oversees players who aren't interested in anything other than a final pay check.

No self-respecting footballer in their prime years would ever consider playing there and it shows by the standard. The quality of defending alone makes our back line look like AC Milan's in the 90s.
 

skybluecam

Well-Known Member
It really isn't. It's still very much a retirement league that attracts oversees players which aren't interested in anything other than a final pay check.

No self-respecting footballer in their prime years would ever consider playing there and it shows by the standard.

The quality of defending makes our back line look like AC Milan's in the 90s.
I'm sure you regularly watch MLS games
 

Mucca Mad Boys

Well-Known Member
It really isn't. It's still very much a retirement league that attracts oversees players who aren't interested in anything other than a final pay check.

No self-respecting footballer in their prime years would ever consider playing there and it shows by the standard. The quality of defending alone makes our back line look like AC Milan's in the 90s.
Paterson is in his 30s, he’s not in his prime…

Even if we signed him, he’s not being brought in as the main man but a squad player. Someone with 13 or so goal contributions last season isn’t to be sniffed at.
 

Domo

Well-Known Member
think admins will make some kinda of made in "cov, signs for cov, hes one of our own etc etc etc" videos when/(IF) he signs?
 

rob9872

Well-Known Member
It's not that £7k is breaking the bank, but we have a squad value and rules to follow. If that £7k means we can't afford to pay our potential incoming midfielder eg £18k then it's more breaking the structure that enables us to improve, when arguably he's a risk.
 

ceetee

Well-Known Member
This is demonstrably untrue - MLS salaries are all published every year as part of the players' union agreement with the league. Paterson was on $534,000 a year, which works out at roughly £8,400 a week. £7k would be a pay cut.

It's £7k more than an unemployed footballer is paid
 

ptr

Well-Known Member
pato wants 7k a week

Cov refusing to offer that

he was on 15k in America
Lampard No GIF by MolaTV

Frank when he realises we can’t even afford Paterson….and that Doug’s ‘promotion clauses’ don’t work when you’re in the bottom half.
 

skyblue025

Well-Known Member
It's not that £7k is breaking the bank, but we have a squad value and rules to follow. If that £7k means we can't afford to pay our potential incoming midfielder eg £18k then it's more breaking the structure that enables us to improve, when arguably he's a risk.
The funny thing is you think we are signing someone else this window. 🤣
 

Deity

Well-Known Member
I don’t have any inside info on this but I would be amazed if Pato even started training with us with a view to earning a contract unless his package requirements were seen to be broadly ok.

£7k vs £15k is not broadly aligned.

Therefore either GIMOC is wrong or he didn’t join us initially to earn a contract but just to get fit and our view on him changed during those training sessions.
 

Nick

Administrator
I don’t have any inside info on this but I would be amazed if Pato even started training with us with a view to earning a contract unless his package requirements were seen to be broadly ok.


Yeah you would think there would be basic conversations to start with.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top