Pato (63 Viewers)

ptr

Well-Known Member
Oh fook off Peter
Animated GIF
 

Great_Expectations

Well-Known Member
I can see why this is being ridiculed considering the continuous back and forth every window.

However, I think it’s a good signing. He’s got plenty of Championship experience, is technically very good and can play across the front three.

He’ll also be 10000% committed and demonstrate that on the pitch, something we’ve all moaned about lacking this year.

It’s low risk, low cost and at the least gives us an attacking creative option off the bench.
 

Gint11

Well-Known Member
I can see why this is being ridiculed considering the continuous back and forth every window.

However, I think it’s a good signing. He’s got plenty of Championship experience, is technically very good and can play across the front three.

He’ll also be 10000% committed and demonstrate that on the pitch, something we’ve all moaned about lacking this year.

It’s low risk, low cost and at the least gives us an attacking creative option off the bench.

If it’s a deal to the end of the season it’s worth a go. If he can add small contributions but boost our in-game management for the younger players, it might really help.
 

Sky Blue Harry H

Well-Known Member
why does everyone give ITK's shit, they're giving information they have to us, shit happens sometimes that delays announcements, and frank isnt about to say in the press conf that "oh yeah hes having a medical and were planning on signing him today" when things could fall through.

i know i know GIMOC was/is still about n 2 weeks late to his 48hours signing announcement, but id rather had some excitement about transfers than another thread about vegetables football chants (sorry @Sky Blue Harry H )
Haha - no offence taken mate - happy to hear rumours about stuff/potential ins/outs etc, it's just the 'leaking' of team news on social media that I think is wrong (but a minor irritation in the bigger picture). PUSB!
 

Nick

Administrator
Surely there's no rule saying players need to be announced as long as they have signed and done paper work?

In theory (and I'm not saying this is the case here), a club could sign a player and not do an announcement and just put them in the squad on match day.
 

Saddlebrains

Well-Known Member
Cant see it being the next few days anyway, very minimal training today, none Tuesday or Wednesday, so the only proper training session is Thursday. Maybe then.

I do notice we have a PDL game v Birmingham Friday wouldn't be surprised to see him play that then announce if he comes through it ok
 

edgy

Well-Known Member
Cant see it being the next few days anyway, very minimal training today, none Tuesday or Wednesday, so the only proper training session is Thursday. Maybe then.

I do notice we have a PDL game v Birmingham Friday wouldn't be surprised to see him play that then announce if he comes through it ok
Got a game at The HIggs tomorrow too.
 

CovLad94

Well-Known Member
Cant see it being the next few days anyway, very minimal training today, none Tuesday or Wednesday, so the only proper training session is Thursday. Maybe then.

I do notice we have a PDL game v Birmingham Friday wouldn't be surprised to see him play that then announce if he comes through it ok
Any more on Rak-Sakyi? After your man saying that's progressed.
 

Sky Blue Goblin

Well-Known Member
pato wants 7k a week

Cov refusing to offer that

he was on 15k in America
You see this is the issue isn’t it. He was apparently signed and done but now turns out he hasn’t even agreed wages with us?

Face value 7K when we are apparently pot-less is a lot for a player we don’t even know if he can last 90 minutes. I would understand it if he played a lot in America but he barely played four games.

Still think he’s a good signing but not at that price.
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
Wouldn’t have an issue with a low base and playing bonuses. Wouldn’t want to sign him and then he never gets fit enough or good enough to play.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top