Supporters Consultative Group (6 Viewers)
- Thread starter MichaelCCFC
- Start date
M&B Stand
Well-Known Member
Michael, do us one of you're equations again. You know the ones, where ACL charge as high rent (or fees)as possible and it still being better financially than renting sixfields, justifying the milking of the club, but in a positive way. They're my favourite.
Sky Blue Harry H
Well-Known Member
M&B Stand
Well-Known Member
I've not heard anyone use an ironic 'not' since Gareth Keenan in The Office.
Grendel
Well-Known Member
Ha ha ha ha!!!!'
ccfcway
Well-Known Member
cloughie
Well-Known Member
Whatever anybody's stance is, it is clear that the group supposedly representative of the supporter base put together to have a close link to the club management is clearly in Fisher/ML/Sisu's pocket.
Why this is a problem is that it is not accurately representing the views of the fan base at the meetings it holds.
Even for the sake of levelling it out a bit, the lack of a SBT seat on the Scg is surely a sign of which side of the fence they sit on.
Why this is a problem is that it is not accurately representing the views of the fan base at the meetings it holds.
Even for the sake of levelling it out a bit, the lack of a SBT seat on the Scg is surely a sign of which side of the fence they sit on.
Nick
Administrator
There is trust people at the scg?
Thought the last 'meeting' seemed to suggest they (or at least the chair) didn't want them there?
My point being if they are weeded out then the group isn't as impartial/representative as it should be
Nick
Administrator
I agree, the tone was wrong and they should speak to Steve and sort it
I can assure you that the Sky Blue a Trust are not going anywhere. The Trust actually formed the original SCG and we will remain on the group to represent our members and all fans.
georgehudson
Well-Known Member
i'd guess that there are tens of thousands of fans who have been driven away from the club due to the blatant bigotry displayed by the various parties, some to a much larger extent than others,
they, of course, have to prepare their stance for the JR,
& as such show how caring they are (this, imho, is bullshit),
as a fan who has been abused by the owning mob, i say,
'i despise your antics & tactics'
as a fan of over 55 years, i feel nothing but sadness,
just remember, you devout christians,
you reap what you sew
they, of course, have to prepare their stance for the JR,
& as such show how caring they are (this, imho, is bullshit),
as a fan who has been abused by the owning mob, i say,
'i despise your antics & tactics'
as a fan of over 55 years, i feel nothing but sadness,
just remember, you devout christians,
you reap what you sew
My point exactly.
Show us the proof, why do some fans feel they have the right to hold this information from us?
letsallsingtogether
Well-Known Member
So Torch it is wrong to call someone a Sixfielder but it is alright when you call them Hillers, NOPM Brigade an such so the double standards are out again.
Oh and Grendel I was a westender a term that was used for decades any city supporter should know this.
Oh and Grendel I was a westender a term that was used for decades any city supporter should know this.
L
limoncello
Guest
Funnily enough I was on a bus today and had no hassle at all except for this eastern European bloke who kept looking at me funny.
letsallsingtogether
Well-Known Member
olderskyblue
Well-Known Member
It is odd that someone who claims to be a long standing city supporter didn't know this. It was such a common term.
letsallsingtogether
Well-Known Member
That is my thoughts exactly :thinking about:Could understand the younger ones not knowing but even my 19 year old son knows that term....
mighty quinn
New Member
You hav'nt got that car yet /
Settle for that SAAB,I let my old Classic go last year and regret It.
sky blue john
Well-Known Member
Secret Meetingeners !!
Hobo
Well-Known Member
We even had the excellent fanzine called The Westender
skybluealan
Well-Known Member
If you have never heard of these terms, there is no way you have been a long standing Coventry fan. The statement you made shows you are just a Sisu feed boy/girl
skybluealan
Well-Known Member
This applies to Grendel
skybluetony176
Well-Known Member
Using that same logic. If you take the suxfields rent and equate it to the number of paying attendees Cardoza and NTFC are milking the club many times worse than ACL ever did. At least there was enough in the kitty from the ticket sales to pay the rent at the Ricoh. Also goes to prove that it never was and never will be about the rent.
Last edited:
torchomatic
Well-Known Member
Subfields and now suxfields. The creative juices have been flowing
Sent from my GT-I9505 using Tapatalk
torchomatic
Well-Known Member
It was the tone rather than the name. But anyway, Moz sent me a text last night and it was sorted. My drama queen moment.
Sent from my GT-I9505 using Tapatalk
torchomatic
Well-Known Member
Excellent? It was rubbish. I found a stack of them in the loft not too long ago.
Sent from my GT-I9505 using Tapatalk
skybluetony176
Well-Known Member
Creative context aside I'm right though, aren't I.
torchomatic
Well-Known Member
MichaelCCFC
New Member
To try and get this thread back on track...
Having slept on it, I remain genuinely shocked that when a group of City fans are doing nothing more than selling t-shirts with the message 'keep cov in cov' on and encouraging people to sign the FixFootball.co.uk ePetition (which everyone from Tim Fisher to Ann Lucas has signed) someone from the SCG would go out of their way to tell those fans that what they are doing is 'anti-sisu', they are completely wrong etc etc.
There have been several attempts to portray kcic, and me personally, as extreme and militant but the reality is kcic has never done anything that could be remotely classed as 'militant' and selling t-shirts with a widely supported message and promoting an ePetition calling to account all parties is not extreme! kcic is now reflecting mainstream opinion: acl/ccc have questions to answer but sisu are primarily responsible for moving us to NTFC; the key priority is getting us back to the Ricoh; what matters is the interests of the team and fans not a hedge fund or local authority. It is those, whether the scg member yesterday, certain posters on here, or the acl/ccc defenders who are ever more distant from the mainstream and are now at the extremes of what is going on
Having slept on it, I remain genuinely shocked that when a group of City fans are doing nothing more than selling t-shirts with the message 'keep cov in cov' on and encouraging people to sign the FixFootball.co.uk ePetition (which everyone from Tim Fisher to Ann Lucas has signed) someone from the SCG would go out of their way to tell those fans that what they are doing is 'anti-sisu', they are completely wrong etc etc.
There have been several attempts to portray kcic, and me personally, as extreme and militant but the reality is kcic has never done anything that could be remotely classed as 'militant' and selling t-shirts with a widely supported message and promoting an ePetition calling to account all parties is not extreme! kcic is now reflecting mainstream opinion: acl/ccc have questions to answer but sisu are primarily responsible for moving us to NTFC; the key priority is getting us back to the Ricoh; what matters is the interests of the team and fans not a hedge fund or local authority. It is those, whether the scg member yesterday, certain posters on here, or the acl/ccc defenders who are ever more distant from the mainstream and are now at the extremes of what is going on
skybluetony176
Well-Known Member
I wouldn't like to comment.
Sent from my GT-I9505 using Tapatalk
I'll take that as a yes ;-)