No negotiations (7 Viewers)

MichaelCCFC

New Member
Unless someone knows different, sisu have not contacted acl and there are no negotiations taking place. Time to start judging sisu by their actions not their words?
 

dongonzalos

Well-Known Member
If true from two parties who claim to care about the fans.
Who both say Coventry at the Ricoh is the best thing.
Who have both said they would welcome talks.
It is an utter disgrace.
 

Ian1779

Well-Known Member
Unless someone knows different, sisu have not contacted acl and there are no negotiations taking place. Time to start judging sisu by their actions not their words?

Maybe we should apply the same logic to KCIC.......
 

torchomatic

Well-Known Member
KCiC Statement:

If SISU do not open talks with ACL by Friday 18th July 5pm, then I'll jolly well wrestle an Action Man, jump off a doll's house and then crush a grape. You have been warned.

From the Not On Anyone's Side, SISU OUT! Division
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
KCiC Statement:

If SISU do not open talks with ACL by Friday 18th July 5pm, then I'll jolly well wrestle an Action Man, jump off a doll's house and then crush a grape. You have been warned.

From the Not On Anyone's Side, SISU OUT! Division

Lol!

I do wonder why Kcic have dropped their strapline - "sisu pick up the phone" - any ideas why?
 

skybluetony176

Well-Known Member
Lol!

I do wonder why Kcic have dropped their strapline - "sisu pick up the phone" - any ideas why?

Talking of phones, you still havent PM'd me ML's phone number like you said you would 2days ago. Any chance i could have it in the next 3weeks?
 

MichaelCCFC

New Member
Talking of phones, you still havent PM'd me ML's phone number like you said you would 2days ago. Any chance i could have it in the next 3weeks?

Tony, I can let you have it because while facts never get in the way of certain posters on here I spoke to ML on the phone as well as several texts and emails. If ML was agreeable I'd be happy for it all to be put in the public domain
 

skybluetony176

Well-Known Member
Tony, I can let you have it because while facts never get in the way of certain posters on here I spoke to ML on the phone as well as several texts and emails. If ML was agreeable I'd be happy for it all to be put in the public domain

Thank Micheal. If you can PM it to me that will be great.

Or email me as we're BFF's :)
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
Thank Micheal. If you can PM it to me that will be great.

Or email me as we're BFF's :)

I chose not to. Personally I think handing numbers out to all and sundry is not advisable.

I reviewed your posting history and concluded you lack maturity and should not be trusted with personal information.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
Tony, I can let you have it because while facts never get in the way of certain posters on here I spoke to ML on the phone as well as several texts and emails. If ML was agreeable I'd be happy for it all to be put in the public domain

Shame you didn't answer his call a few weeks ago.
 

skybluetony176

Well-Known Member
I chose not to. Personally I think handing numbers out to all and sundry is not advisable.

I reviewed your posting history and concluded you lack maturity and should not be trusted with personal information.

In which case why did you offer to do so in the first place?

In other words you used your post to try and call my bluff and belittle me. Very mature. What did you think i was going to do? Offer it out on a public forum to all and sundry like you did?
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
I did speak to ML on the phone - why are you lying? I am more than happy to put everything in the public domain - why don't you get ML to agree to that?

Why then did you say you had appointed a third party to take the call and then said they had not been in touch with you?
 

Limey

Well-Known Member
I'm intrigued as to why the Friday statement from kcic? If the group is in talks to ML then they obviously have some weight on the situation. What happens after Friday? No action = no credibility with SISU?

SISU need to realise fan power in the situation. Are we going for AFC Cov from Friday then?
 

spider_ricoh

New Member
Why then did you say you had appointed a third party to take the call and then said they had not been in touch with you?

Hang on, I thought you said that the KCIC offer was a waste of everyone's time??

Stick the knife into anyone who isn't SISU, at any opportunity....
 

spider_ricoh

New Member
And for that matter, negotiations may not have been publicised, but I'd never take that as "no negotiations" -if things can happen in person and not via public statement, that has to be a good thing

That said, SISU haven't dropped their legal action, so not hold your breath on the subject of talks/peace breaking out.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
Hang on, I thought you said that the KCIC offer was a waste of everyone's time??

Stick the knife into anyone who isn't SISU, at any opportunity....

In my view it is a waste of time. The offer only applied to gates below 5,000 so no offer.

My view was it was only there so Kcic can produce a cheap headline along the lines of "sisu turn down the Ricoh and double the attendance for free".

I may be wrong of course but Michael never gives details of the offer.

Is there any reduction for gates over 5,000? If not what is the motivation for the offer?

These aren't pro sisu "shouty type" questions but legitimate concerns regarding specifics of the deal he was only too pleased to put in the public domain.
 

MichaelCCFC

New Member
Why then did you say you had appointed a third party to take the call and then said they had not been in touch with you?

Get ML to agree to put it all in the public domain and the truth will be there for all to see or continue with your bs - your choice but I won't hold my breath
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
Get ML to agree to put it all in the public domain and the truth will be there for all to see or continue with your bs - your choice but I won't hold my breath

At least you are now talking so can you answer the questions regarding the deal I raised above?
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
Get ML to agree to put it all in the public domain and the truth will be there for all to see or continue with your bs - your choice but I won't hold my breath

But you will never answer legitimate questions either and get very defensive when questions are put to you.

In the proposed deal if gates were above 5,000 would the consortium have paid anything towards the rent?

That's a perfectly legitimate question and for the sake of clarity and courtesy I believe you should respond.
 

RoboCCFC90

Well-Known Member
'Unless someone knows different' is always a good start to a proclamation.

It depends on what you know and not who you know.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
In which case why did you offer to do so in the first place?

In other words you used your post to try and call my bluff and belittle me. Very mature. What did you think i was going to do? Offer it out on a public forum to all and sundry like you did?

I didn't - it seems Michael will though. As usual after chucking a few insults Michael refuses to answer questions.

I sometimes wonder if he and ML went to the same finishing school.
 

Nick

Administrator
Get ML to agree to put it all in the public domain and the truth will be there for all to see or continue with your bs - your choice but I won't hold my breath
Which parts to go into public? What is bs? Why not prove everybody wrong and get out your smoking gun?
 

spider_ricoh

New Member
In my view it is a waste of time. The offer only applied to gates below 5,000 so no offer.

My view was it was only there so Kcic can produce a cheap headline along the lines of "sisu turn down the Ricoh and double the attendance for free".

I may be wrong of course but Michael never gives details of the offer.

Is there any reduction for gates over 5,000? If not what is the motivation for the offer?

These aren't pro sisu "shouty type" questions but legitimate concerns regarding specifics of the deal he was only too pleased to put in the public domain.

You clearly doubt that the KCIC is worthwhile, so why are you giving Michael a hard time about talking with ML?

Could it be that deriding anyone but SISU is all you're interested in?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top