Huddersfield after Pressley (4 Viewers)

Forums New posts
Grendel

Grendel

Well-Known Member
Samo

Samo

Well-Known Member
Mary_Mungo_Midge said:
Deserved for what? Pointing out that his conclusion is without fact? Look back in this thread. It's Grendel dishing out the insults and high-handedness. Yet when he's challenged, it's the same faces chipping in, 'liking' and accusing people of the very behaviour Grendel starts. Do you all have lunch together?
Click to expand...

Deserved for this kind of divisive shit:
''What I do note, though, is many of the people who are counting this story as a nothing story, are those who normally take a more than sympathetic line to the current club's owner's politic. For obvious reasons''
 
SIR ERNIE

SIR ERNIE

Well-Known Member
Mary_Mungo_Midge said:
Deserved for what? Pointing out that his conclusion is without fact? Look back in this thread. It's Grendel dishing out the insults and high-handedness. Yet when he's challenged, it's the same faces chipping in, 'liking' and accusing people of the very behaviour Grendel starts. Do you all have lunch together?
Click to expand...

You must realise by now MMM that the SISU Loyalists are a tightly knit handful who will defend each other and the owners regardless of all others including the football club and fellow fans.
 
Grendel

Grendel

Well-Known Member
SIR ERNIE said:
You must realise by now MMM that the SISU Loyalists are a tightly knit handful who will defend each other and the owners regardless of all others including the football club and fellow fans.
Click to expand...

So one of the rules of being a sisu loyalist is to stand by an article in the local rag when it clearly has no foundation at all.

What rot.
 
Mary_Mungo_Midge

Mary_Mungo_Midge

Well-Known Member
Samo said:
Deserved for this kind of divisive shit:
''What I do note, though, is many of the people who are counting this story as a nothing story, are those who normally take a more than sympathetic line to the current club's owner's politic. For obvious reasons''
Click to expand...

I'm divisive? You absolute joker. That comment comes after this lot from Grendel on this thread alone......

I think if we want some comedy moments we should dredge out your threads hero worshiping the fat lazy loser that fooled you into believing he was a football manager

Or

What does that say about you? You certainly seem to want them hanging around for a long time. I guess it's just an act - are you related to fisher by any chance?

Or

I fail to see those remarks as being personal. He was fat. He was definitely lazy. He was certainly a loser

Or

Remember last time round some idiots wanted bobby Gould, the only clown who ran thorn close, back in charge

You're right, they're all respectful and designed to bring about fan unity :sarcasm:
 
Grendel

Grendel

Well-Known Member
Mary_Mungo_Midge said:
I'm divisive? You absolute joker. That comment comes after this lot from Grendel on this thread alone......

I think if we want some comedy moments we should dredge out your threads hero worshiping the fat lazy loser that fooled you into believing he was a football manager

Or

What does that say about you? You certainly seem to want them hanging around for a long time. I guess it's just an act - are you related to fisher by any chance?

Or

I fail to see those remarks as being personal. He was fat. He was definitely lazy. He was certainly a loser

Or

Remember last time round some idiots wanted bobby Gould, the only clown who ran thorn close, back in charge

You're right, they're all respectful and designed to bring about fan unity :sarcasm:
Click to expand...

I would think every fan does agree thorn was a loser and every fan (bar the lunatic fringe) would agree on my assessment of Goulds managerial capability.

Saying Andy thorn was shit isn't divisive - it just embarrasses the tiny handful that stood with him to the grim end - like you and Don.

What you said was divisive as it suggests some wierd agenda. The truth is the "agenda" is from people who want to make up rubbish to create instability in the club.
 
Mary_Mungo_Midge

Mary_Mungo_Midge

Well-Known Member
Grendel said:
Saying Andy thorn was shit isn't divisive - it just embarrasses the tiny handful that stood with him to the grim end - like you and Don.

What you said was divisive as it suggests some wierd agenda. The truth is the "agenda" is from people who want to make up rubbish to create instability in the club.
Click to expand...

Being divisive is to constantly and regularly misrepresent people to marginalise them in the way you have again above. Again, my view on Thorn was pretty much as articulated here two years ago:

http://www.skybluestalk.co.uk/threa...ity-s-failure/page2?highlight=fisher+charlton

Stood with him? I think not
 
Grendel

Grendel

Well-Known Member
Mary_Mungo_Midge said:
Being divisive is to constantly and regularly misrepresent people to marginalise them in the way you have again above. Again, my view on Thorn was pretty much as articulated here two years ago:

http://www.skybluestalk.co.uk/threa...ity-s-failure/page2?highlight=fisher+charlton

Stood with him? I think not
Click to expand...

So you like me identified thorn as a dud in September 2011 and demanded his sacking then? Odd I seem to recall you staunchly defending him - I will have a look what you said at the time.
 
Mary_Mungo_Midge

Mary_Mungo_Midge

Well-Known Member
Grendel said:
So you like me identified thorn as a dud in September 2011 and demanded his sacking then? Odd I seem to recall you staunchly defending him - I will have a look what you said at the time.
Click to expand...

Okay. I'll wait. I can guarantee you'll find nothing as retrospectively embarrassing as the ones you posted abut the 'great job' Fisher was doing....
 
Grendel

Grendel

Well-Known Member
Mary_Mungo_Midge said:
Okay. I'll wait. I can guarantee you'll find nothing as retrospectively embarrassing as the ones you posted abut the 'great job' Fisher was doing....
Click to expand...

Well if Pressley did go to another club he'd be only the second manager to be headhunter in 60 years so on that basis he'd certainly be a successful in that aspect of recruitment.

Frankly this is irrelevant though. You accused me of being divisive and Samo "a joker" for declaring thorn was crap. He was crap - that's not divisive. Your tone and manner, however, was.
 
Mary_Mungo_Midge

Mary_Mungo_Midge

Well-Known Member
Nick said:
Like that tweet.this morning? How did that turn out.
Click to expand...

No. Nothing like it. That was acknowledged as confusion, wasn't it?

As opposed to the story running at the same time as Sky Bet had our manager down as joint favourite for a job. That's not confusion, is it? That's reporting events.

Grendel claims that he's only favourite due to the Telegraph's reporting, which he can't substantiate, but when you follow his twisted logic - that local reporting influences betting odds - can't answer why the steadfast refusal he heard on CWR this morning hasn't ruled Pressley out. If one Telegraph article can be the only factor in his ascension, why can't a correspondingly damning ruling-out of his chances have the reverse influence?

Apart from that, your comparison holds water totally. Thanks for the input
 
stupot07

stupot07

Well-Known Member
mrtrench said:
I agree with spider_ricoh. Thorn was building a good side, his signings were not shite like Pressley's and he was treated appallingly.
Click to expand...

Kilbane, Reece brown, Barton, Cody, Elliot, Malaga, Hussey, Dunn, callum ball, He signed some dross.
 
Mary_Mungo_Midge

Mary_Mungo_Midge

Well-Known Member
Grendel said:
Well if Pressley did go to another club he'd be only the second manager to be headhunter in 60 years so on that basis he'd certainly be a successful in that aspect of recruitment.

Frankly this is irrelevant though. You accused me of being divisive and Samo "a joker" for declaring thorn was crap. He was crap - that's not divisive. Your tone and manner, however, was.
Click to expand...

You are aware that this twisted morality comes after - in the same thread - you've called other fans 'some idiots'? :claping hands:
 
Grendel

Grendel

Well-Known Member
Mary_Mungo_Midge said:
No. Nothing like it. That was acknowledged as confusion, wasn't it?

As opposed to the story running at the same time as Sky Bet had our manager down as joint favourite for a job. That's not confusion, is it? That's reporting events.

Grendel claims that he's only favourite due to the Telegraph's reporting, which he can't substantiate, but when you follow his twisted logic - that local reporting influences betting odds - can't answer why the steadfast refusal he heard on CWR this morning hasn't ruled Pressley out. If one Telegraph article can be the only factor in his ascension, why can't a correspondingly damning ruling-out of his chances have the reverse influence?

Apart from that, your comparison holds water totally. Thanks for the input
Click to expand...

Very little money is going on this sort of bet. The CET article will have influenced people to bet on it. They will not have listened to cwr as they more than likely live in Yorkshire and even if they did can't get their money back.
 
Mary_Mungo_Midge

Mary_Mungo_Midge

Well-Known Member
Grendel said:
Very little money is going on this sort of bet. The CET article will have influenced people to bet on it. They will not have listened to cwr as they more than likely live in Yorkshire and even if they did can't get their money back.
Click to expand...

The fact you've mustered this arbitrary distinction so that your flawed logic still makes sense to you is worrying.....
 
Samo

Samo

Well-Known Member
SIR ERNIE said:
You must realise by now MMM that the SISU Loyalists are a tightly knit handful who will defend each other and the owners regardless of all others including the football club and fellow fans.
Click to expand...

I fucking hate SISU you ignorant oaf!
 
H

Hugh Jarse

Well-Known Member
For some reason i actually trust Pressley when he talks of being here for the long term project. Mind you i trusted Robins when he said the club was in his blood.
Click to expand...

Always knew that :jerkit: would get his eventually, :censored: Judas
 
Evans1883

Evans1883

New Member
Strange thing is , robins was sacked after winning 2 in 22 5 in 2014 , playing....."............3-5-2 or 5-3-2 , i have so much faith in this formation im going to explode with excitement
 
Hobo

Hobo

Well-Known Member
Huddersfield after Pressley? Surely that should read Huddersfield after Robbins? The English language is an arse!
 
K

Kingokings204

Well-Known Member
Tbf the market is so open and pressley at 2-1 or 3-1 doesn't exactly say it's a sure thing does it.

Huddersfield don't know yet and looking at the other candidates there is better and they are free agents as it were .
 
ccfcway

ccfcway

Well-Known Member
Kingokings204 said:
Tbf the market is so open and pressley at 2-1 or 3-1 doesn't exactly say it's a sure thing does it.

Huddersfield don't know yet and looking at the other candidates there is better and they are free agents as it were .
Click to expand...

tbf, there is better free agents than Sean Miller, but we still signed him
 
J

Jack Griffin

Guest
OK, it means nothing I know, but here are the latest odds..

Next Permanent Manager
Steven Pressley 11/10 Neil Lennon 4/1 Billy Davies 7/1 Jackie Mcnamara 14/1
Malky Mackay 16/1 Brian McDermott 16/1 Neil Warnock 16/1 Tony Mowbray 16/1
Mark Lillis 16/1 Owen Coyle 16/1 Tim Sherwood 16/1 Brian Laws 20/1
Steve Thompson 20/1 Chris Hughton 20/1 Simon Grayson 22/1 Andy Booth 25/1
Karl Robinson 25/1 Sean O'Driscoll 25/1 Graeme Jones 25/1 Dave Jones 25/1
Stuart McCall 25/1 Dean Gorre 25/1 Russell Slade 25/1 Terry Butcher 25/1
Steve Eyre 25/1 Darren Ferguson 25/1 Alan Curbishley 33/1 Gary Megson 33/1
Terry Connor 50/1 Paul Jewell 50/1 Dale Tempest 250/1
Click to expand...
 
duffer

duffer

Well-Known Member
Jack Griffin said:
OK, it means nothing I know, but here are the latest odds..
Click to expand...

It means something, I think. Those odds represent people putting money down, so presumably there's more money going on SP than anyone else.

I'm guessing it's not a particularly big market, the next Huddersfield manager, so someone lumping a load on Pressley could probably skew the odds quite a lot - but most people do at least some kind of rudimentary analysis before risking their cash.

Anyway, I still don't think SP will go, fwiw, but I'd rather not see him as the current favourite.

Incidentally, if you fancy a punt on SP going, you'll get better odds with Coral...

http://www.oddschecker.com/football/football-specials/huddersfield/next-permanent-manager
 
shmmeee

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
Most likely pessimistic City fans putting a bet on has pushed his to favourite. And the favourite at this point almost never gets the job at this level.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 5 (members: 0, guests: 5)
Top