Thanks........I think :thinking about:
I don't come out with bullshit. I get hammered by some for putting questions that can't be answered in a truthful way that still goes with their 100% view. But most of us know that all sides were at fault here. And it all went seriously wrong with Richardson and went downhill from there.
I would like to know why a few still try and change the recent history of our club when we have so much good going on. SISU have finally come to reality and have got the playing side right. This is a major bonus. But I would love to know what their plans are for the near future on where to play. And some seem to know who to blame when we know next to nothing.
Wasps shouldn't be in Coventry. But we can't blame them for everything. But looking through this thread some are blaming them for everything. It had all gone badly wrong before they came to Coventry. They just took advantage of the situation.
Usually I would only quote the sentence in bold, but I have to say I agree overall with the entire post.
The sentence in bold: Sisu have stepped back and left the company in the hands of TF/SW on the condition they stop the 'send more money' postcards. TF/SW now act as chairman and CEO and only seem to speak out publically when pushed by journalists (or speak at SCG meetings).
It seems hiring TM and trust him and his team with everything football related has been the right call. TM is what makes the real difference.
Sisu's plans and the clubs plans are two completely different matters. Sisu may plan to sell, to just walk away or to stay for years, but as long as the club is
self-sufficient their plans shouldn't influence on the clubs plans. The clubs plans may change if new owners comes in, but I would like to see a period of stability before that.
Surely the stadium issue requires our attention, but questions about the contract at the Ricoh should be directed to SW, not sisu or TF.