Search results

£10m pw.

They of course need to finance their transfer activity, which will in part be facilitated through the sale of fringe players, but I think it's more of a case that they're pricing Davies at an overinflated rate to see who will bite. Similar to what Liverpool did with Solanke. If they actively...

“I was at the EFL awards recently and I spoke to a number of older club owners and they asked, ‘Tim, what are we going to do?’” Fisher tells The Athletic. “I told them to get moving, because the situation is all catching up with us. If you don’t learn from COVID and the current situation then...

Did we?

They'll certainly have money to spend but a significant chunk will undoubtedly go towards offsetting their eye-watering losses over the past 2 years.

Davis is English and is under contract at a PL club. The same applies to Archer, who's also young and currently excelling in England's U21s. The two examples aren't really comparable as Villa don't actively need to sell and are in a position where they can price their players at overinflated...

What Championship clubs were willing to pay pre-pandemic likely differs wildly to what they will now. Even clubs like Middlesbrough who traditionally are big spenders are unlikely to be making outright 8-figure bids - even if they are set for a £20m windfall from the Spence sale. Baring in mind...

He'll almost certainly be snapped up by a PL club this summer. Forest are linked as he's played under Cooper previously at Swansea.

CB reinforcements are desperately needed. If McFadzean opts to move on we're down to two recognised CBs.

Middlesbrough, Rangers and Watford amongst others keeping tabs on him. Equally, I'd imagine a loan fee would be demanded given the level of interest.

It's not. It seems that every one of Derby's near takeovers have fallen foul despite the potential owners showing proof of funds. It's when the time comes to transfer the money that the 'unforeseen issues' occur.

It could be that, but he's probably the sort of player we'd potentially be looking at.

Yeah on the face of it I think we certainly need at least 6 signings - and that's not including replacement for any outgoings.

He shouldn't have signed him in the first place.

In the 18 months he's been here he seemingly hasn't at all progressed and hasn't received any glowing reports or praise. The only real major update is that he's not suited for the position that he was signed for. Not exactly a great sign.

As previously mentioned though, six outgoings doesn't necessarily translate into room being made for six signings due to the club likely having to shoulder a decent proportion of the aforementioned players wages. I'd imagine if we're successful in shipping out all of the above then...

Think he's on Bristol City's radar as well.

He wouldn't as he's terrible with the ball and his defending ability is suspect at best. His only use is that he can score from set pieces.

Huge amount in fees gone out on most of those players. Murphy £11m, Bacuna £3m and £3m for Smithies.

Unfortunately the fact he's a low earner is the very reason behind why he could potentially leave.