Search results

I'd imagine his wages are likely north of £20k pw.

I suppose if he's struggling and has reached out it would be pretty poor from the club to ignore that.

Perhaps. It's likely less than ideal for the backroom staff to have to go out and look for a replacement for Kane due to the obvious reasons, so it probably works for both parties that a second chance is given - assuming that's even the case of course.

True, but I mean more in terms of 'burning bridges' or whatever the correct label is. It just seems bizarre that Todd Kane is somehow the exception to the rule when it's not really taken all that much for players in the past to be frozen out by Robins.

They can still sign players - only free agents or loans though.

I think that was just a rumour.

Yeah I don't really remember a player ever receiving a reprieve under Robins so it's a bit strange that Todd Kane of all people is seemingly the first to change his mind.

By that logic Brentford fans would've been fuming at signing Ivan Toney.

I think I'll avoid social media for the first week post sale. "Look after him [Enter Club Name]"

I mean if you bothered reading my previous posts in this thread I've already said that?

Literally no one has said that? It's a possibility that the club will however have to factor into their decision making as and when bids start coming in.

Hamer's new contract is likely completely financially unsustainable in the long run and he's one that Robins feels he can probably most afford to lose out of the three. At a guess.

But saying he might not because countless players haven't isn't really all that relevant. The point is at present he is a player that is considered to have a very bright career ahead of him and that's supported by the fact Spence is attracting serious interest from Spurs and Gyokeres' only...

The issue is Pete, all aforementioned players go into the final year of their contracts next summer. The club at present are in the driving seat with regards to what they can demand from interested parties. However, if any of the three suffer injuries/drop of form then come next summer their...

Not really, I think the club should certainly hold out for his maximum worth. I just don't conform to the idea that a club would realistically pay £15m or higher for him though.

Those two players are massive exceptions to the rule though. Using those examples to support your arguement doesn't disprove mine. I do think it's inconceivable though otherwise by your own logic Maddison or Bellingham shouldn't have gone for more than McBurnie or Bowen (yes I know a winger)...

You're placing far too much onus on goals and assists and completely ignoring how integral he is to the side. Other than Hamer he's probably our only consistent link between defence and attack, his ability to stop the opposition's run of play by tracking back and get the ball back quickly is...

It could be his agent going into hyperdrive or the Mail simply picking a name out of the hat to be fair. But either way I doubt he'd come here.

Brighton heavily linked.

Well it isn't is it. Look at players sold by Championship clubs for that figure and you'll realise any notion of the club placing a value of that size on Gyokeres' head is frankly idiotic.