Well this inspector was saying they were aware last year.Sunderland are still claiming they had know idea until he changed his plea to guilty at the last minute
Or was the judge taking the piss
No offence, mate but you need to join the rest of us in the 21st century.100% correct, but a slap on the wrist surely, 6 months , or maybe a suspended sentence would more fitting here?
Yes, tis possible, but he had already pleaded guilty to one charge of sexual contact pre-trial and she stood by him then, so she already knew he was guilty of some stuff anyway.His partner could go to court to prevent him having access to their child and would be able to make a decent case as he is a convicted sex offender. I know someone who did this but didn't win only because the charges against her ex were dropped. However, her ex still has restricted access to their child. AJ will not see his child for some considerable time in all likelihood even when he is released.
No offence, mate but you need to join the rest of us in the 21st century.
The views you express are excusing a crime in all the usual ways.
He broke the law and will get his punishment. Given his age, fame, relationship status etc he deserves no sympathy. When he comes out he will still be a millionaire who can play football in Asia or somewhere where they don't care about his background. I hope his case serves as a lesson to a lot of rich young men who think they are above the law and standards of decency.
This is incorrect. He got found guilty of one charge, not guilty for another and pleaded guilty for 2 charges.equally , no offence either, but you need to open your eyes to what actually happens in the world
your assumption that a 15 year old girl can be the innocent party is blinkered, a jury of 12 didnt believe a word of her story, he got not guilty verdict, and only got convicted of the crimes he admitted to, it says alot for the girl imo
and not once have i excused this man, hes an adult, and as an adult you need to show some self control
I can only assume he didn't know she was 15 at first. She was hanging around and looking for autographs and you have to remember, she idolised him and he was her favourite player.What I find odd is why would you even take the risk? A PL footballer is not going to be short of willing partners yet you get people acting like Evans.
Same with Johnson, even if we're drawing a conclusion that he likes young girls there must be plenty of willing 16 year olds. Sure people would think it was a bit odd should it become public knowledge but he wouldn't be looking at prison and a destroyed career.
I can only assume he didn't know she was 15 at first. She was hanging around and looking for autographs and you have to remember, she idolised him and he was her favourite player.
I would guess that he spotted her and was attracted to her and then they started communicating and at that point she told him she was 15. It was at that very point that he should have totally backed away and distanced himself.
He obviously didn't though and his lust kicked in and he just assumed then he would get away with it.
Seems to me he had ample opportunity to reflect and walk away. 836 text messages between the pair! And that's the bit that has me totally disbelieving the club's account of the tale.
Are they seriously trying to say that amongst those 836 messages they were shown by the police, not one of them had any suggestive sexual content or talk of what they wanted to do to and with each other?
Will Sunderland be in big trouble over this?
He pleaded not guilty to two offences and was convicted of one, so how does that mean he only got convicted of the crimes he admitted to?your assumption that a 15 year old girl can be the innocent party is blinkered, a jury of 12 didnt believe a word of her story, he got not guilty verdict, and only got convicted of the crimes he admitted to, it says alot for the girl imo
The lawyer, who works for one of Britain’s top civil claims companies, told the Express: “If there was potential of long-lasting psychological damage, it could be £1million.“If it is not a long-term issue, I still envisage a six-figure payout.”
They say the victim could sue Johnson for psychological damage and post-traumatic stress.
How in anyway is she guilty of anything? She was a child ffs
How in anyway is she guilty of anything? She was a child ffs
His punishment certainly seems out of proportion compared to Jimmy Saville.
Jimmy saville was dead when the abuse came to light .. I don't know what punishment he could of got ?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Do the courts make an assessment of an individuals capacity to give consent?
Age of consent is an interesting concept really in so far as its just an arbitrary number that was picked. There's no real science behind it. Just look at the range in different countries, Germany for example is 14, France is 15. Take Europe as a whole and 15 is the most common age. Move outside Europe and its all over the place ranges from 12 - 21.
Many countries have, or did until recently have, different ages of consent for heterosexuals and homosexuals.
Still, at the end of the day he knew the law and knew what he was doing - it is totally on him.
oh most definitely nick, but this woman, if she is of a type , and we've all known one , shes just a little whorebag (if) then shes found i right tit to mes up his life, his whole life is gone at 30 years old, a bit fucking shocking thinking about it
you live in an incredibly blinkered world
His sister has tried to start up a Justice for Johnson campaign. Its gone about as well as you would imagine.
How can you have a campaign for justice for someone who pled guilty???
Yeah, remember this one. It's ridiculous isn't it and there is no consistency whatsoever.Unless she means for the sentence.
This woman had full sex with an 11 year old - http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/babysitter-who-sex-11-year-6586886 - Suspended Sentence
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?