stupot07
Well-Known Member
It's all about the Bass
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors
Small butt's are usually a good thing to have, but not in this case.
We are looking for much bigger butts.
Small butt's are usually a good thing to have, but not in this case.
We are looking for much bigger butts.
You been looking at my missusI like big butts and I cannot lie.
Well it is a cute chin☺Nah, your chin
Well it is a cute chin☺
Well it has been punched on a few occations that could be the reason.☺No its not!
Well it has been punched on a few occations that could be the reason.☺
FWIW I have a mate who's Dad is a rugby nut and as he's pretty loaded and involved in sponsorship knows quite a few important people in the game. Asked him to find out if there is anything to this and the response was that talks have taken place between both parties (CCFC and CRFC) and the rugby club were very receptive to what they were told about stadium expansion and a future ground share.
As I said its not first hand information so don't take it as gospel but it does seem that it has at least been / is being looked into as a possible option.
no news on wasps talk?
surerly we will take the 2 year extention at very least? if we in championship we wanna continue to ride the buzz, not open up the season in a shed
More likely the talks would be about a shared new stadium.
Still don't see this CCFC/CRFC joint venture happening at the BPA. Not convinced it will fit on the site and work logistically but happy to be shown to be wrong on that
Would think that CRFC are looking for partners for a scheme to improve their ground but would they want to give up the control of it? Are there other teams that would be interested in such a joint venture?
Has anyone actually questioned the CRFC to see if there is truth in it? If there have been talks what kind of direction did they take and are they on going? Have they talked to CCC or other parties? Can't help feeling that sometimes in this whole drama that talks happen simply to say they went on, not with any great intent though
Are CCC and SISU willing to be involved in something together because if it is BPA they will need to work together? If not who is saying no? or are both rejecting working together?
As usual it is a muddled and muddied picture of information............ is that deliberate?
How many does Butts park hold, and is it seating or standing?
3,000 capacity. Not sure how much the stand holds. I take it there's still standing areas besides the stand isn't there?
So would need a serious remodel. Would it not be easier to rip it down and start a-fresh, if it is to happen? Location looks a bit small on google earth, would need to tear down the Albany theatre to make room, even then it looks small. Plus im not sure it has the correct info structure, roads look a bit small to handle the capacity.
What is info structure?
the basic, underlying framework or features of a system or organization. 2. the fundamental facilities and systems serving a country, city, or area, as transportation and communication systems, power plants, and schools.
I was mainly talking about the access road, im sure plumbing and power would not be a problem
So would need a serious remodel. Would it not be easier to rip it down and start a-fresh, if it is to happen? Location looks a bit small on google earth, would need to tear down the Albany theatre to make room, even then it looks small. Plus im not sure it has the correct info structure, roads look a bit small to handle the capacity.
I'm not trying to be funny here, but have you ever been to Coventry?
If you had you'd know the BPA is on a major road into and out of the City Centre. The ringroad is a couple of hundred yards away. Access to the A45 is no more than 3 miles away. Hardly what I'd term as small roads.
And not forgetting the railway station is a 15 minute stroll away.
Highfield Road was hardly surrounded by big roads!
Yes I know Otis ...... cant see the attraction of 18stone blokes rolling around in cold mud meself though
....... actually I must because I do go to CRFC games when I can:laugh:
Capacity is 4000 btw with 3000 in that one stand
Is it similar to infrastructure?
Nope. Info structure is like infrastructure but with more info.
Still don't see this CCFC/CRFC joint venture happening at the BPA. Not convinced it will fit on the site and work logistically but happy to be shown to be wrong on that
Would think that CRFC are looking for partners for a scheme to improve their ground but would they want to give up the control of it? Are there other teams that would be interested in such a joint venture?
Has anyone actually questioned the CRFC to see if there is truth in it? If there have been talks what kind of direction did they take and are they on going? Have they talked to CCC or other parties? Can't help feeling that sometimes in this whole drama that talks happen simply to say they went on, not with any great intent though
Are CCC and SISU willing to be involved in something together because if it is BPA they will need to work together? If not who is saying no? or are both rejecting working together?
As usual it is a muddled and muddied picture of information............ is that deliberate?
As I have pointed out to you before - No one is going to give you the type of information you are seeking
As to "Questioning CRFC" - I doubt that would go down well!
Oh silly me, I should know better and just accept things spoon fed :facepalm: So because you say so I should stop asking questions or challenging carefully laid perceptions
Ever consider I ask questions to try to suggest people think of it different ways and that I might not be expecting (a) the questions to be actually put immediately to CCFC CRFC CCC etc and (b) am not expecting any answers from those parties, parties who I might add continually rattle on about transparency and always fail to deliver as you well know
Still don't see this CCFC/CRFC joint venture happening at the BPA. Not convinced it will fit on the site and work logistically but happy to be shown to be wrong on that
Would think that CRFC are looking for partners for a scheme to improve their ground but would they want to give up the control of it? Are there other teams that would be interested in such a joint venture?
Has anyone actually questioned the CRFC to see if there is truth in it? If there have been talks what kind of direction did they take and are they on going? Have they talked to CCC or other parties? Can't help feeling that sometimes in this whole drama that talks happen simply to say they went on, not with any great intent though
Are CCC and SISU willing to be involved in something together because if it is BPA they will need to work together? If not who is saying no? or are both rejecting working together?
As usual it is a muddled and muddied picture of information............ is that deliberate?
If you not expecting answers it seems a silly idea to post the questions. I understand you consider they are deeply thought provoking but this is a football forum not a philosophy course. As I understand it from past posts you have or have had meetings with all the parties so why dont you ask them direct? I also note you tend to avoid raising questions what WASPS intentions are - now that would be interesting!
If you not expecting answers it seems a silly idea to post the questions. I understand you consider they are deeply thought provoking but this is a football forum not a philosophy course. As I understand it from past posts you have or have had meetings with all the parties so why dont you ask them direct? I also note you tend to avoid raising questions what WASPS intentions are - now that would be interesting!
If you not expecting answers it seems a silly idea to post the questions. I understand you consider they are deeply thought provoking but this is a football forum not a philosophy course. As I understand it from past posts you have or have had meetings with all the parties so why dont you ask them direct? I also note you tend to avoid raising questions what WASPS intentions are - now that would be interesting!
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?