Butts park arena? (1 Viewer)

[Sky Blue Kid]

So what was the crap coming from SISU about CCC won't let us build a Stadium inside Coventry's boundary then. :facepalm:

The mighty SISU lawyers would certainly have already known that, wouldn't they?...Just shows they talk s**t about a "New Stadium then doesn't it?

 

---

[Sky Blue Kid]

No they don't, if they refuse you appeal to the secretary of state.

The mighty SISU lawyers would certainly have already known that, wouldn't they?...Just shows they talk s**t about a "New Stadium then doesn't it?

 

[Terry Gibson's perm]

Could park at the Ricoh and get the train into the city centre and then walk at least the station at the Ricoh would get some use

 

[Deleted member 5849]

Wasps deputy chief has just spoken about today's developments. He's happy for CCFC to stay but club is free to do what is best for them. It doesn't matter if CCFC leave the Ricoh.

So as it stands, based on what they all say today.

Wasps are happy for CCFC to go to the Butts.

CCC are happy for CCFC to go to the Butts.

CRFC are happy for CCFC to go to the Butts.

CCFC are happy for CCFC to go to the Butts.

 

[Sky Blue Kid]

Could park at the Ricoh and get the train into the city centre and then walk at least the station at the Ricoh would get some use

Ahh! but not on "Match Days" apparently.

 

[chiefdave]

So what was the crap coming from SISU about CCC won't let us build a Stadium inside Coventry's boundary then. :facepalm:

Are you referring to the meeting Fisher had with RBC to supposedly persuade them to allow a stadium to be built there? "There are investors interested, so long as the physical resource is outside of Coventry due to Coventry Council attempting a hostile takeover of the club they don’t wish to invest in Coventry”

Or are you referring to Matton comments about there being no possible site within the city boundary for a new stadium. The key word there is new, this wouldn't be a new site.

 

[Sky Blue Kid]

So as it stands, based on what they all say today.

Wasps are happy for CCFC to go to the Butts.

CCC are happy for CCFC to go to the Butts.

CRFC are happy for CCFC to go to the Butts.

CCFC are happy for CCFC to go to the Butts.

But are SISU?

 

[chiefdave]

It doesn't matter if CCFC leave the Ricoh.

Sure I've heard that line somewhere before, did he say ACL were washing their face?

 

[Deleted member 5849]

Are you referring to the meeting Fisher had with RBC to supposedly persuade them to allow a stadium to be built there? "There are investors interested, so long as the physical resource is outside of Coventry due to Coventry Council attempting a hostile takeover of the club they don’t wish to invest in Coventry”

Or are you referring to Matton comments about there being no possible site within the city boundary for a new stadium. The key word there is new, this wouldn't be a new site.

It's also worth noting that this Gannon bloke wants to draw a line under whatever has gone before.

Shouldn't we be agreeing with him on that, and allowing them to actually constructively talk to one another?

 

[Buster]

Its not a bluff. Coventry rugby club are keen to push ahead to follow in the footsteps of of Nuneaton RFC. We all know how well that turned out!

 

[Grendel]

So as it stands, based on what they all say today.

Wasps are happy for CCFC to go to the Butts.

CCC are happy for CCFC to go to the Butts.

CRFC are happy for CCFC to go to the Butts.

CCFC are happy for CCFC to go to the Butts.

Italia SBK and Senior Thick aren't too chuffed to be fair. Tony says he's unsure that moving into a stadium owned by a rugby club may be right for "his" team, OSB has concerns on parking (rather odd given there is nowhere to park at the Ricoh) and dongle is avoiding all questions on the councils apparent attempt to strangle at birth this concept.

Everyone else seems on board.

 

[tisza]

I doubt SISU would put the money in. I can see them trying to raise it by naming rights or something like the bonds.

we've been told on many occasions (particularly during the rent dispute) that funding/investors were lined up for a new stadium if a location could be found.

 

[Otis]

All irrelevant as Coventry City haven't managed an average attendance of 25k or more since 1971, and in the last 25 years have had an average in excess of 20k on just 5 occasions, that's with an away allocation of circa 6k at the Ricoh and 4k at HR.

But the whole point of my listing these is because they are nearly all expanding

I would say it is irrelevant going back 25 years because clubs then had smaller capacities than they do now in many cases.

My whole argument is that surely we want to be looking for a stadium to cater for us for the next 50 years plus.

We have had very little success at all these past 25 years. We have success, attendances will increase.

We need to look for a new home and one tied in with Cov sounds brilliant in theory, but we need to look past just the now and we need foundations for many, many years to come.

In theory I love the Butts concept.

 

[Deleted member 5849]

and dongle is avoiding all questions on the councils apparent attempt to strangle at birth this concept.

I'd focus on him saying how he prefers Butts.

I reckon that's him on board, whether this is a blind alley or a deep hole we're delving into.

 

[Sky Blue Kid]

Are you referring to the meeting Fisher had with RBC to supposedly persuade them to allow a stadium to be built there? "There are investors interested, so long as the physical resource is outside of Coventry due to Coventry Council attempting a hostile takeover of the club they don’t wish to invest in Coventry”

Or are you referring to Matton comments about there being no possible site within the city boundary for a new stadium. The key word there is new, this wouldn't be a new site.

I'm talking about the "Original flounce" by Tim Fisher about "Being kicked out of the Ricoh" when the total opposite was the case. Then the "We're going to build a Stadium outside,but no further than 8 miles from the City Centre."

 

[Sky Blue Kid]

How many years down the line are we? and still waiting for the "Build" to take place?

 

[torchomatic]

But the whole point of my listing these is because they are nearly all expanding

I would say it is irrelevant going back 25 years because clubs then had smaller capacities than they do now in many cases.

My whole argument is that surely we want to be looking for a stadium to cater for us for the next 50 years plus.

We have had very little success at all these past 25 years. We have success, attendances will increase.

We need to look for a new home and one tied in with Cov sounds brilliant in theory, but we need to look past just the now and we need foundations for many, many years to come.

In theory I love the Butts concept.

They all "want" to expand maybe. But do Charlton need a 40K stadium for example? Just because someone else wants to do something doesn't mean to say it'll happen or it's a sensible idea.

 

[fernandopartridge]

But the whole point of my listing these is because they are nearly all expanding

I would say it is irrelevant going back 25 years because clubs then had smaller capacities than they do now in many cases.

My whole argument is that surely we want to be looking for a stadium to cater for us for the next 50 years plus.

We have had very little success at all these past 25 years. We have success, attendances will increase.

We need to look for a new home and one tied in with Cov sounds brilliant in theory, but we need to look past just the now and we need foundations for many, many years to come.

In theory I love the Butts concept.

Going back to 1971 we've had 30 years on the top flight, an FA Cup win, two league cup semi finals. The most successful period in the club's history really.

 

[chiefdave]

I'm talking about the "Original flounce" by Tim Fisher about "Being kicked out of the Ricoh" when the total opposite was the case. Then the "We're going to build a Stadium outside,but no further than 8 miles from the City Centre."

8 miles would be inside the city boundary.

 

[tisza]

Bournemouth have had massive success on 11K. So what if we start at 15K. In the last decade how many times have we needed the full capacity of the Ricoh? We have to start somewhere. I think a smaller capacity will drive the demand for tickets if we do well and that can only be a good thing. It might be an issue in a decade or three, but it's not an issue now, I don't think.

don't like using Bournemouth as an example as their success has nothing to do with gates or fanbase just a massive investment from owners into playing side. A wage bill of well over 30 million in their promotion season has nothing to do with ticket money, F&B or other stadium income.

 

[stupot07]

Wasps deputy chief has just spoken about today's developments. He's happy for CCFC to stay but club is free to do what is best for them. It doesn't matter if CCFC leave the Ricoh.

Heard that one before...


Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk

 

[oldskyblue58]

Italia SBK and Senior Thick aren't too chuffed to be fair. Tony says he's unsure that moving into a stadium owned by a rugby club may be right for "his" team, OSB has concerns on parking (rather odd given there is nowhere to park at the Ricoh) and dongle is avoiding all questions on the councils apparent attempt to strangle at birth this concept.

Everyone else seems on board.

Suggest you read the other posts then that say its a good or great idea rather than trying to twist my words in order to make another pointless contribution

Nothing wrong with asking questions far more constructive than childish name calling and derogatory comments

 

[chiefdave]

They all "want" to expand maybe. But do Charlton need a 40K stadium for example? Just because someone else wants to do something doesn't mean to say it'll happen or it's a sensible idea.

And of course we regularly hear the 'we should never have left HR' line. Capacity at HR was 23,489.

 

[Nick]

Simon is still going on like he has won the internet. Very arrogant.

 

[lifeskyblue]

I would be happy with the site but not the capacity. Otis is right...clubs are expanding capacity.
The argument about comparing gates 25 years ago is meaningless as virtually no club had bigger gates regularly back then.
If we have ambition on the pitch we should have ambition off it. Successful clubs will look to expand the fanbase attending matches.
Let's see how ambitious SISU are. Let's see how ambitious CCFC are and let's see if ccc want a successful vibrant and well supported football club as part of the future of the city.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[chiefdave]

Pretty promising from the old folks home as well:

Earlsdon Park Village opens this summer, bringing older people into the heart of community life here in Earlsdon.

As part of our community engagement programme, we already have a strong and positive relationship with the Rugby Club and will continue to work with them to help ensure any proposals take into consideration our residents’ aspirations and interests.

 

[torchomatic]

I would be happy with the site but not a he capacity. Otis is right...clubs are expanding capacity.
The argument about comparing gates 25 years ago is meaningless as virtually no club had bigger gates regularly back then.
If we have ambition on the pitch we should have ambition off it. Successful clubs will look to expand the fanbase attending matches.
Let's see how ambitious SISU are. Let's see how ambitious CCFC are and let's see if ccc want a successful vibrant and well supported football club as part of the future of the city.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Which clubs are ACTIVELY expanding capacity, not WANT, but actually doing it?

 

[torchomatic]

Simon is still going on like he has won the internet. Very arrogant.

I like that everything is written along the lines of "the story WE broke", etc. He probably looked on here at 9.51.

 

[stupot07]

Championship attendance as a % of their capacity, 25K more than big enough for the championship.

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk

 

[tisza]

And of course we regularly hear the 'we should never have left HR' line. Capacity at HR was 23,489.

problem wasn't the capacity at HR. HR was ours.
problem was leaving HR without having secured funding for the Ricoh.
If we owned the Ricoh no-one would have issues with its capacity etc. or any other stadium-related issues. We could have spent the last 10 years bitching about crap hotdogs or dumpy cheerleaders rather than F&B income etc.

 

[Nick]

I like that everything is written along the lines of "the story WE broke", etc. He probably looked on here at 9.51.

Yeah, just had a look. The telegraph tweeted their story about 15 minutes after the Observer..

Usually it gets tweeted straight away doesn't it?

 

[AFCCOVENTRY]

Currently the plans to 25k would hold good in the Championship. If we made it back the top flight that's where the issue will come?

What then? Do we then build another stadium or are Sisu hoping Wasps will be bankrupt by then and go and buy the Ricoh.

 

[torchomatic]

Currently the plans to 25k would hold good in the Championship. If we made it back the top flight that's where the issue will come?

What then? Do we then build another stadium or are Sisu hoping Wasps will be bankrupt by then and go and buy the Ricoh.

We make a pile of money as there would be sellouts every week. The demand for tickets would hopefully be huge and we may even have a waiting list for season tickets. Sounds good to me. Can't see what the issue is.

 

[JimmyHillsbeard]

Italia is just being sensible. You start putting the SISU flags up ................ I'll wait.

Genuine question. Is this a quirk of the new site design, a login fail or have you taken to referring to yourself in the third person?

 

[dongonzalos]

Can't sign anything with the council blocking it can we?

The council are stopping us signing up to a long term rent deal at the Ricoh