If we recruit properly we will get upgrades on the players we have hence why players will need to earn their place, including COH. There is no point in doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.Completely agree with the first half, not sure if O’Hare needs to earn his place but I definitely think we need to roll the dice when it comes to transfers. We rolled it on our European signings last year and it paid off massively, can’t see a reason why we shouldn’t do it again. Keep O’Hare and add depth and more starting quality.
We rolled the dice under Ron Atkinson and spent over 20 years in the wilderness. We can't confine our transfer dealings to expensive foreign players on four year contracts.Completely agree with the first half, not sure if O’Hare needs to earn his place but I definitely think we need to roll the dice when it comes to transfers. We rolled it on our European signings last year and it paid off massively, can’t see a reason why we shouldn’t do it again. Keep O’Hare and add depth and more starting quality.
Yet we bought Haji, Saka, Milan and Torp and they’ve been brilliant. To me it makes absolutely no sense to regress back to the old days of getting cast-offs from other championship teams on a free.We rolled the dice under Ron Atkinson and spent over 20 years in the wilderness. We can't confine our transfer dealings to expensive foreign players on four year contracts.
Torp has hardly been brilliant, yes hes looked promising but saying brilliant is just pure hyperbole.Yet we bought Haji, Saka, Milan and Torp and they’ve been brilliant. To me it makes absolutely no sense to regress back to the old days of getting cast-offs from other championship teams on a free.
Alright Torp hasn’t been amazing but he hasn’t started many games, the other European signings have been brilliant for us. MVE has probably doubled in value and has genuine threat/pace. It’s mad to think people don’t want more of that tbh.Torp has hardly been brilliant, yes hes looked promising but saying brilliant is just pure hyperbole.
We'd at least make our money back on him though meaning that signing him wasn't a risk but an investment.Torp has hardly been brilliant, yes hes looked promising but saying brilliant is just pure hyperbole.
based on what?We'd at least make our money back on him though meaning that signing him wasn't a risk but an investment.
The 4th goal at Wembley which made him an instant overnight household namebased on what?
I think it’s a fair call.based on what?
Hadn't torp just finished an entire season before coming to us?Torp has hardly been brilliant, yes hes looked promising but saying brilliant is just pure hyperbole.
yeah believe soHadn't torp just finished an entire season before coming to us?
He looked absolutely shagged in the latter games of the season.
Yep agreed would be brilliant and the depth in midfield then would be enough and allow us to focus on other areas.I'd love him to stay and play infront of Sheaf and stamenic , can't see it
Ccfc mongHadn't torp just finished an entire season before coming to us?
He looked absolutely shagged in the latter games of the season.
Normally just lurk, coming out of my shell hereyeah believe so
very interesting username too
Normally just lurk, coming out of my shell here
I thought PVA, but realised the original post made too much sense to be him.First post he has made since 2011. Or just logged into an old al account by mistake possible. PVA could be the prime suspect.
Genuinely just don't post.First post he has made since 2011. Or just logged into an old al account by mistake possible. PVA could be the prime suspect.
Genuinely just don't post.
I lurked back on GMK in the 00s.
Don't know how true this is - Exclusive: Leeds to rival Southampton, Burnley for quality Coventry star who's rejected new contract
First post he has made since 2011. Or just logged into an old alt account by mistake possibly. @PVA could be the prime suspect.
What? You're the one that loves ableist slurs so it's more likely to be you let's be honest.
It was the reference to CCFC that made me conclude it was unlikely to be you in truth
Don't know how true this is - Exclusive: Leeds to rival Southampton, Burnley for quality Coventry star who's rejected new contract
All three clubs are almost certainly interested. Add Leicester also. Possibly also Villa.
Thats the advantage of being out of contract. COH can pick and choose.
But they may not be the clubs COH hoped would be interested
I’d jump at the chance to play for Villa if I was him. Not far from home, doesn’t really have to relocate, potentially playing champions league football. The only downside is that they’re probably interested in someone a lot better than him
Yeah I'm not sure why Villa would be interested when they've got Ramsey, Rogers and others for that position.
Mostly because it’s a low risk, relatively cheap transfer but the Villa links were reported weeks ago with nothing since
Yeah there’s no chance he goes there. Nowhere near the level they’re shopping at. Plus they’re buying Barkley who has much more pedigree for the same position.I’d jump at the chance to play for Villa if I was him. Not far from home, doesn’t really have to relocate, potentially playing champions league football. The only downside is that they’re probably interested in someone a lot better than him
teamtalk, usually just clickbaitDon't know how true this is - Exclusive: Leeds to rival Southampton, Burnley for quality Coventry star who's rejected new contract
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?