This is from someone who is named after a toy bear who takes little princesses into the woods
Unfortunately for me ccfc and sisu are one of the same and sisu use our name.
I can understand that sbd we each ratify things in our own way and nothing wrong in that. Unfortunately this has become a war between very stubborn generals, who are not afraid to use any weapons available to them and CCFC is a weapon used by both sides suffering and causing collateral damage. The real damage done is to the supporters - without them there is no club
Thing is a second admin is not just a points deduction or am I wrong?Spot on SISU use CCFC like a hostage Deal with us or the club gets it!. I think the talk of the club folding is way wide of the mark, Its a threat nothing more, they will want to retain the golden share. Admin on the other hand could be a possibility with SISU again picking up the pieces being the largest creditor (at least SISU companies are).
Thing is a second admin is not just a points deduction or am I wrong?
Thing is a second admin is not just a points deduction or am I wrong?
to be honest I am not at all sure what they might do.
That really leaves the club in limbo to find its own level. If SISU are not required to put in more funding then the club probably knocks around the bottom half of L1 until it gets relegated because funding from turnover will get less and less before we get relegated again. Only way they get major capital return is by selling on a stadium (and surrounding development) with at least CCFC as long term tenant...... is that why BPA is so important? is that why CCFC/CRFC are pushing for this it seems in a bit of a panic? If that BPA development were key then I find the attitude the owners adopt towards CCC (irrespective of CCC actions) to be strange and counter productive - it wont get done without CCC onside, and that means eating humble pie if the CCFC owners stay
Said before I think we have become a zombie club, not seen anything that improves that description. I think the only action will be inaction in terms of progressing the club
Absolutely rightIt's a pity that the warring factions can't see that. Or maybe they can see it but just don't care.
Didn't they already try that one when we came into league 1If SISU had any sense they'd relegate us again so we could win a few matches next season, allow people to say how they'd learned from their mistakes.
Didn't they already try that one when we came into league 1
Other way around Imo. Think CA was pushing for a Ricoh deal.Crowley’s tweet claims it was “SISU’s unwillingness to budge on the BPA deal” that led to CA leaving. Does that wording suggest that CA saw a viable way forward at the Butts, but SISU’s intransigence somehow scuppered it?
As I think someone once memorably said on here, we are being treated "like lemmings in a mushroom factory”.
KC said a deal at Butts would have been viable but SISU refused to settle court matters and reconcile.Other way around Imo. Think CA was pushing for a Ricoh deal.
Crowley’s tweet claims it was “SISU’s unwillingness to budge on the BPA deal” that led to CA leaving. Does that wording suggest that CA saw a viable way forward at the Butts, but SISU’s intransigence somehow scuppered it?
As I think someone once memorably said on here, we are being treated "like lemmings in a mushroom factory”.
Which then raises the question of course as to why Millerchip was insistent on legal action that has nothing to do with him ceased.KC said a deal at Butts would have been viable but SISU refused to settle court matters and reconcile.
Which then raises the question of course as to why Millerchip was insistent on legal action that has nothing to do with him ceased.
Or is it he knew that deal is gone for the BPA and the Ricoh is the only way, but people above him couldn't move on?
I think for either Ricoh or BPA the legals have to be dropped anyway.
But its a very specific thing. If he said I don't want the rugby club getting involved with SISU given what their history I don't think anyone would have raised an eyebrow but it was specifically stopping legal action against the council. Why would doing that make all his concerns for CRFC disappear?Because he isn't an idiot?
Not for the Ricoh they don't.
The BPA thing is a joke. With millerchip controlling the lease and his obvious leanings that was a no go anyway
The Ricoh discussions will commence again nearer the deadline.
So it was pointless negotiating for the BPA because of Millerchips association with the council.
So Wasps is the route to go???
I agree with your point btw regarding the negotiations.
We should have took the deal a long long time ago well before the Northampton debacle.
Now it will be on Wasps terms.
How do you interpret KC's tweet?
confirmed within CT web siteThere are strong rumours going round social media then he will be leaving the club tomorrow. I don't know if they're true and I also don't know how much of a difference (if any) it would make to us. He doesn't seem to do a lot anyway
The BPA "deal" was only on the table if he sold his control of the lease. It came out in a meeting at CRFC. It was never really likely anyway but once it came out that was that.
We were never offered any "deal" before going to northampton.
There is one thing that is saving us from bring booted out all together and that is not changing for the foreseeable future.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?