Yes and as I was thinking last night, don't want too many staff off that are manufacturing the vaccine.Some front line nhs staff up here have already had the jab but it rolls out officially on 4th Jan.....let's hope they dont delay it with more admin fuck ups as were gonna need them all at work to fight this 3rd wave.....just hope they (and our condemned hospital) can cope....
Ditto.Some front line nhs staff up here have already had the jab but it rolls out officially on 4th Jan.....let's hope they dont delay it with more admin fuck ups as were gonna need them all at work to fight this 3rd wave.....just hope they (and our condemned hospital) can cope....
Kidding or not , it's actually taken 3 months Steve so guess it reflects the reality of concluding on what is actually happening.
I agree, but I think possibly the logistics of administering may be an issue and they'll be conscious of over promising. I'm sure in reality the NHS will get out as many as they possibly can. Also by limiting you have to remember how many pricks we have in society. You can imagine the queue jumping and downright anarchy complaining that someone had theirs before someone else who didn't and how in whatever way they perceive 'that's not fair'. I think putting into bands where everyone knows the order prevents some of that and at least people know what window they're in. Hopefully as it goes on every window can be brought forward.Blair makes some good points in his article. We should be using the first doses as they come in rather than holding half back for the second dose and looking at targeting spreaders as well as the vulnerable. It’s clear it’s impossible to throw too much resource at the vaccination program considering the ongoing economic cost of the pandemic. There really should be no reason not to get this done.
Yes and the antigen mass testing values that I was trying to get across to David previously ,sees no other option but for the health passport too , essential really or east Will never meet West Will it?Blair makes some good points in his article. We should be using the first doses as they come in rather than holding half back for the second dose and looking at targeting spreaders as well as the vulnerable. It’s clear it’s impossible to throw too much resource at the vaccination program considering the ongoing economic cost of the pandemic. There really should be no reason not to get this done.
All the best, what a pisser.Got symptoms again so just been for a test by the skydome. Immaculate gag reflex, so there’s definitely other career opportunities out there for me.
All the best, what a pisser.
Yes and as I was thinking last night, don't want too many staff off that are manufacturing the vaccine.
Didn't you have Covid around the time of the March lockdown?Yep. Meant to be having my son tonight as well. I’m gutted, had a cough for a few days but temperature came on last night. Other than that feel fine though.
Didn't you have Covid around the time of the March lockdown?
Sent from my I3113 using Tapatalk
Hopefully it's something else, then.Yep. Meant to be having my son tonight as well. I’m gutted, had a cough for a few days but temperature came on last night. Other than that feel fine though.
Be interested to know FP’s take but been told by the wife of a friend who works fairly high up in the NHS that general consensus within NHS management that the government are deliberately overplaying the new strain card as a get out of jail free card because they didn’t lockdown soon enough, didn’t lockdown long enough, shouldn’t have called the Xmas bonanza, shouldn’t have put London into tier 2 and numerous other mistakes over the last couple of months leading to numbers running away.
The overplaying which has now led to chaos all around the country.
I didn't mention brexit lad, I simply responded to it being mentioned.Ireland Will do.
You can keep it all for you and your ilk.
Xenophobe.
Edit:-
Anyway fuck off to the Brexit thread if that is what you
champion.
So the government scientists are in on it too? To what end?
I don’t think that the government advisors are in on it at all. Their job is to advise not govern. Is there a new strain,yes. They advised. Does it behave differently to previous strains, yes. They advised. Have they advise that we panic? Does the government then take this advice and govern, yes.So the government scientists are in on it too? To what end?
To be fair they have trained up a huge number of people to administer the vaccine beyond nurses. As the less sensitive vaccines are approved and rolled out the easier it will get. Just this Pfizer one that needs the second jab
From people I work with in the NHS the main agenda item is all vaccination roll out, I haven't really discussed anything much about the mutation. I think it's both true that the mutation exists and that the Tories will seek to blame it on the increase in cases (which has some validity but not to the extent they'll play it)Be interested to know FP’s take but been told by the wife of a friend who works fairly high up in the NHS that general consensus within NHS management that the government are deliberately overplaying the new strain card as a get out of jail free card because they didn’t lockdown soon enough, didn’t lockdown long enough, shouldn’t have called the Xmas bonanza, shouldn’t have put London into tier 2 and numerous other mistakes over the last couple of months leading to numbers running away.
The overplaying which has now led to chaos all around the country.
I don’t think that the government advisors are in on it at all. Their job is to advise not govern. Is there a new strain,yes. They advised. Does it behave differently to previous strains, yes. They advised. Have they advise that we panic? Does the government then take this advice and govern, yes.
You have to remember this is the same government that didn’t react soon enough in the first wave despite the advice coming from SAGE, alternative SAGE and a whole raft of experts. The same government who didn’t react as quickly as the devolved governments when SAGE held a press conference before half term. Northern Ireland went back into lockdown and extend half term to two weeks, for instance. The same government that put London into tier two when numbers were still rising and London has now practically gone from tier two to tier four. All of this against the advice of SAGE, they weren’t in on it then and they aren’t in on it now. Their remit ends at advise, any under reaction or over reaction is down to government and how they govern.
Because of the R rate.So if it's just the government now "deliberately overplaying" the new strain, why did Vallance say restrictions would need to be expanded on Monday?
I'm sure you've spent a decent amount of energy this year arguing with people claiming there's something untoward going on, the science doesn't add up, the authorities aren't to be trusted etc. Now you're doing the exact same thing by spreading rumours from a friend of a friend.
What exactly did he say? A lot of the experts have been saying more restrictions were needed before anyone knew about this knew strain. Did he specifically link the need to expand restrictions to the new strain?why did Vallance say restrictions would need to be expanded on Monday
Doesn't the AZ vaccine require a 2nd jab as well?
The whole discrepancy in their results was whether trial members had had half a dose for their first jab or not.I didn't think the Oxford one did?
What exactly did he say? A lot of the experts have been saying more restrictions were needed before anyone knew about this knew strain. Did he specifically link the need to expand restrictions to the new strain?
Because of the R rate.
I’ve always trusted the science, I don’t believe that the government has. I believe that when the science smacks the government in the face the second time they act and its too late. The government has always been reactive not proactive. The government learned the sum total of fuck all from the first lockdown. The government wasted the first lockdown and the time it brought especially in preparing schools for a return, testing and track and trace.
The problem from the start has been the government not their scientific advisors, governments govern, advisors advise.
You've got to admit though that the government having Tier 4 places neighbouring Tier 2 ones is illogical. It's of course only coincidental that the Tier 2 places are basically all Tory constituencies.“The tier decisions are not ones that are for me, but I will say that the evidence in this virus is it spreads easily, it's more transmissible, we absolutely need to make sure we've got the right level of restrictions in place. I think it is likely that this will grow in numbers of the variant across the country, and I think it's likely therefore that measures will need to be increased in some places in due course, not reduced. So I think it is a case that this will spread more.”
I'm no fan of the government response, far from it. But to start suggesting that things aren't as they seem (because you heard it from a friend of a friend!) is the same kind of conspiracy hearsay nonsense that covid truthers have been peddling all year. It just undermines the huge public health effort that's needed here, and that the scientists are calling for. You can already see other people in this thread saying they think it's all a convenient smokescreen etc.
I didn't think the Oxford one did?
You've got to admit though that the government having Tier 4 places neighbouring Tier 2 ones is illogical. It's of course only coincidental that the Tier 2 places are basically all Tory constituencies.
Absolute belter. Take a bow.Cornwall going into tier 4 from midnight from tier 1
Loads of pirates have returned for Christmas and the aaarrrhhghhhh rate has gone through the roof
What exactly did he say? A lot of the experts have been saying more restrictions were needed before anyone knew about this knew strain. Did he specifically link the need to expand restrictions to the new strain?
The figures around this are plucked from the air before the data has been thoroughly scrutinised.Yes, clearly the government has completely botched the tiers from the start. But I don't think that necessarily means they're now "deliberately overplaying" the new variant. Nor do I think it's wise to undermine the new advice, just because you heard it from your friend's wife.
Statistics can pretty much mean anything dependant on how you present them.
Does the initial presentation offer the Gov't cover for their failure?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?