Coronavirus Thread (Off Topic, Politics) (7 Viewers)

wingy

Well-Known Member
It just sounds so far-fetched that this is a cover-up to improve the government's image. Is this really what people are taking away from all this? Sounds to me like the equivalent of telling the world that you've shat yourself to cover up that you farted earlier.
What do poeple take from the quote 70% transmissibility , what does this mean in raw numbers of infections.
I can't square that circle to 1108 against several hundreds of thousands.
 

David O'Day

Well-Known Member
What do poeple take from the quote 70% transmissibility , what does this mean in raw numbers of infections.
I can't square that circle to 1108 against several hundreds of thousands.

I know they aren't sure if it is accurate, upwards of 50% was a later figure.
 

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
Does this not emphasise enough that shutdown and international travel should have been the policy until eradication,or single figure transmission?
You do have to wonder how many times we have to import an issue from another country until at the very least we put a proper quarantine system in place. Our first major outbreak didn't come from Wuhan, it was a strain from Italy, then after a summer where we got numbers right down a strain from Spain became dominant and now we have one from South Africa.
 

David O'Day

Well-Known Member
there's loads of new strains, that is what viruses do.

Also Bristol back into tier 3, that would wind me up

We seem to avoided tier 4 but really it wouldn't change anything for me
 

CCFCSteve

Well-Known Member
It just sounds so far-fetched that this is a cover-up to improve the government's image. Is this really what people are taking away from all this? Sounds to me like the equivalent of telling the world that you've shat yourself to cover up that you farted earlier.

On a miserable day that analogy did at least make me smile.

The figures around this are plucked from the air before the data has been thoroughly scrutinised.
The words and statements being used extremely dramatic.
On December 13th there were 1108 notified case's of this variant from a period spanning three months when several hundreds of thousands were recorded.
The 70% figure has already been revised down to 50% ,I wouldn't be surprised if it were revised again further down the line to something between 20 and 30% .
So what does 70% more transmissibility really mean .
Statistics can pretty much mean anything dependant on how you present them.
Does the initial presentation offer the Gov't cover for their failure?
The flagship policy of insisting children stay in school and are low risk has been exposed and 'Will' have to be shut for a period .

Edit:- dependant on how long you've lived you get a sense of when things are spun .
This feels like one , just like the Iraq dossier

I can’t argue with the scepticism Wingy (even with the scientists data - the 4K deaths per day on one of the second lockdown slides still pisses me off) but for some the government are damned if they do, damned if they don’t. This strain certainly sounds more transmissible (potentially by quite a bit), they reacted immediately on limited data (after apparently only being informed of the increased transmissibility on Friday - this ties in with scientists I’ve heard speaking from Imperial colleague and Nervtag). It was the right decision.

Yes, London with hindsight, some would argue foresight, should’ve ended up in T2 after national lockdown. It was a borderline call (one that bizarrely Gove argued against but Sadiq Khan lobbied for).

Unfortunately I think we’ve just had an extra dose of shit Covid luck just before Christmas. let’s hope 2021 starts off better for us all
 

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
It just sounds so far-fetched that this is a cover-up to improve the government's image. Is this really what people are taking away from all this? Sounds to me like the equivalent of telling the world that you've shat yourself to cover up that you farted earlier.
I think you can have a middle ground between its all a huge conspiracy and the government being completely honest with the public.

What the experts are suggesting now is not really any different to what they were suggesting before a new strain appeared, its not like overnight their advice has changed in any significant way.

Think there is room for debate over how much the increase is due to a new strain and how much is due to the fact that tier 1 & 2 have little impact. Again the issues with tier 1 & 2 are something the experts have been flagging for a while but have been ignored by the government.

Bizzarly Prof Ferguson said to a Commons Science and Technology Committee today that things should get better over Christmas as schools are and we are not far off a national lockdown. But then went on to say January could be an issue yet there seems to be little talk about keeping schools shut.
 

Ian1779

Well-Known Member
If the strain is that contagious (and more transmissible in school aged kids than original) they’ve got at least consider moving schools in T4 (and probably T3) to online learning for January surely
That would be the move of anyone with any semblance of brain function.
 

Nick

Administrator
Makes you wonder about the original "Tiers" and how out of touch they were.

Unless of course it was in somebodies interests to put certain places in Tier 2.
 

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
for some the government are damned if they do, damned if they don’t.
For me the issue is that the government spout so much shit people have lost confidence that anything they come out with is the truth. Even in the gutter that is politics where covid is concerned it should have been the case that the government were truthful and upfront with the public from day one. We haven't seen anything like that.

Then you add in that the restrictions being put in place, ie: restricting what people do at Christmas and locking down immediately after Christmas (and lets face it even if not in name we're pretty much in a national lockdown from Boxing Day) are exactly what they experts have been calling for and saying will be required, which the government have been denying, and its easy to see how people can view this strain as a convenient way for the government to do what's needed without admitting they've made a mistake.

And of course the argument that if this new strain was really that dangerous and spreading at the rate claimed why are we announcing restrictions for 3 days times rather than putting them in place now.
If the strain is that contagious (and more transmissible in school aged kids than original) they’ve got at least consider moving schools in T4 (and probably T3) to online learning for January surely
We all know the weird obsession with keeping schools open is more as a daycare service so people can go to work rather than any concern about kids education but surely at this point you admit defeat. How many kids and staff will be off? You can't even pretend that things can continue as normal and the exams will go ahead as usual in the summer. And thats before you even consider the potential for spreading it around.
 

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
Are there many going from 2 to 4?
These are all the current tier 2 places and the changes that are coming in.
East of England
  • Cambridgeshire (moving to Tier 4 from Saturday 26 December)
  • the following local authorities in Essex: Colchester, Tendring and Uttlesford (moving to Tier 4 from Saturday 26 December)
  • Norfolk (moving to Tier 4 from Saturday 26 December)
  • Suffolk (moving to Tier 4 from Saturday 26 December)
East Midlands
  • Northamptonshire (moving to Tier 3 from Saturday 26 December)
  • Rutland
North West
  • Cumbria
  • Liverpool City Region
  • Warrington and Cheshire (moving to Tier 3 from Saturday 26 December)
South East
  • West Sussex, East Sussex (except Hastings and Rother) and Brighton and Hove (all moving to Tier 4 from Saturday 26 December)
  • Oxfordshire (moving to Tier 4 from Saturday 26 December)
  • Waverley (moving to Tier 4 from Saturday 26 December)
  • Southampton and Hampshire (all local authorities except Gosport, Havant and Portsmouth)
    • from Saturday 26 December, all Hampshire local authorities currently in Tier 2 will move to Tier 4, with the exception of the New Forest which will move to Tier 3
    • from Saturday 26 December, Southampton will move to Tier 4
South West
  • Bristol (moving to Tier 3 from Saturday 26 December)
  • North Somerset (moving to Tier 3 from Saturday 26 December)
  • Somerset (South Somerset, Somerset West and Taunton, Mendip and Sedgemoor) (moving to Tier 3 from Saturday 26 December)
  • Bath and North East Somerset
  • Dorset, Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole
  • Devon, including Plymouth and Torbay
  • Gloucestershire (Cheltenham, Cotswold, Forest of Dean, Gloucester, Stroud and Tewkesbury) (moving to Tier 3 from Saturday 26 December)
  • Wiltshire and Swindon (Swindon moving to Tier 3 from Saturday 26 December)
West Midlands
  • Shropshire, and Telford and Wrekin
  • Worcestershire
Yorkshire
  • City of York and North Yorkshire
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top