Sky Blue Pete
Well-Known Member
If Nick is correct (and I think he is) this was about getting people boosted rather than anything else and it had the desired effect
If Nick is correct (and I think he is) this was about getting people boosted rather than anything else and it had the desired effectWhat i wanna know is, with the NHS already severely understaffed, how are these 60000 doctors and nurses and care workers (lets take off 34000 that may be in day an admin role) going to be replaced?
Let alone fucking adding numbers of them.
Its going to collapse, the whole system. We're already at 6 millions on waiting lists, We're already seeing people struggling to see GP's, i really see this as the end of the NHS. Cant see it carrying on after this whatsoever
You do make it hard to agree with you. Maybe you’re right this is all a capitalist conspiracy to maximise profits for the pharmaceutical industry. I hope not but it’s a reasonable argument. Need evidence thoughYeah but if everybody gets boosted then there will be no need for Pfizers new wonder pill? The one that helps you with the Omicron.
I checked as someone challenged me, some trusts expect other vaccinations but not the nhs. Some roles do too for things like hepatitis but not all roles. Losing European resource means it’s not a good time to reduce the pool we are fishing in if you pardon the punIf you're arguing that due to a lack of staff the NHS shouldn't require vaccination against covid shouldn't you also be against the existing vaccination requirements for NHS staff or is there some particular reason it should only apply to the covid vaccine?
Aren't the NHS going to deploy people away from front line rolls rather than sack them?
Either way, if the hospitals start getting overwhelmed having an ICU nurse either on the dole or shuffling papers in an office doesn't make sense just because she's not jabbed.
Well reasoned thatI don't want to see people lose their jobs or see workers taken away from the front line which is where many of the problems lie, but if ICU was being overwhelmed and a nurse is on the dole or shuffling papers does it make sense just because they won't wash their hands or wear protective equipment? Or does it pose an unnecessary risk of infection that could easily be mitigated and there would rightly be uproar and recriminations if said nurse were allowed to continue doing their job and endanger patients?
If patients are seeking or undergoing medical treatment there is a much higher chance that they will be in one of the vulnerable categories that puts them at higher risk. It's also an environment that is likely to have covid present and so easier to catch and transmit to others. This makes it potentially a very dangerous environment and all things must be done to reduce that danger.
I really do live rent-free in your head don’t I Mavis?
I don't want to see people lose their jobs or see workers taken away from the front line which is where many of the problems lie, but if ICU was being overwhelmed and a nurse is on the dole or shuffling papers does it make sense just because they won't wash their hands or wear protective equipment? Or does it pose an unnecessary risk of infection that could easily be mitigated and there would rightly be uproar and recriminations if said nurse were allowed to continue doing their job and endanger patients?
If patients are seeking or undergoing medical treatment there is a much higher chance that they will be in one of the vulnerable categories that puts them at higher risk. It's also an environment that is likely to have covid present and so easier to catch and transmit to others. This makes it potentially a very dangerous environment and all things must be done to reduce that danger.
I don't know. Ideally they would but that's going to be a lot of tests and we're struggling to fill demand.This is a genuine question as I don't know.
Are nurses / hospital staff doing weekly / daily COVID tests?
I don't know. Ideally they would but that's going to be a lot of tests and we're struggling to fill demand.
I don't know. Maybe one of those that works or has a relative working in healthcare can enlighten us.So there could actually be staff wondering about with a symptomless infection anyway?
This latest variant "so far" looks to be spreading more in Vaccinated people too. I'm double jabbed so yeah that includes me.
I don't know. Maybe one of those that works or has a relative working in healthcare can enlighten us.
Covid vaccine: People told to travel 100 miles to register overseas jab
People vaccinated abroad must register their jab in person - but only 16 sites are available to do so.www.bbc.co.uk
View attachment 23145
hahaha you couldn’t make it up. This place really is a fucking joke
My sister said people in hospital just in medical secretary offices weren’t masked or doing social distancing so I’m sure testing isn’t daily. You would think lateral flow testing would be a no brainer for anyone in that environment daily. I know in the prison I volunteer at they do multiple times a weekSo there could actually be staff wondering about with a symptomless infection anyway?
This latest variant "so far" looks to be spreading more in Vaccinated people too. I'm double jabbed so yeah that includes me.
I would certainly hope so, yes.You would think they are being tested before their run of shifts at the very least?
Same as school. Surprised labour havent raised that. It’s more of a risk than unvaccinated people working in hospitals.NHS staff are supposed to test themselves twice a week.
NHS staff are supposed to test themselves twice a week.
The pandemic has certainly highlighted a lot of self inflicted issues. As with anything if you're trying to run on the minimum of resources you can get away with when something unexpected happens you've got a problem.I checked as someone challenged me, some trusts expect other vaccinations but not the nhs. Some roles do too for things like hepatitis but not all roles. Losing European resource means it’s not a good time to reduce the pool we are fishing in if you pardon the pun
I checked as someone challenged me, some trusts expect other vaccinations but not the nhs. Some roles do too for things like hepatitis but not all roles. Losing European resource means it’s not a good time to reduce the pool we are fishing in if you pardon the pun
So it's not mandatory to have any other vaccinations in the NHS other than the COVID one?
I can see they didn't decide to make Flu Jabs mandatory yesterday.
Have they said why they chose not to make Flu Jabs mandatory?
Some trusts make it mandatory but not Hmrc as a wholeYep....Hep B is mandatory for some limited specialist roles but ALL OTHER vaccinations are advised through best practice, but not mandated......
..until now!
If you're a nurse looking after immunocompromised patients flu is very dangerousNo....but i'm guessing its cos flu is not "as deadly" or "as contagious" and the flu jabs are less effective than the covid jabs.....
If you're a nurse looking after immunocompromised patients flu is very dangerous
I still think the notion that no one died of it last year is bollocks.
I don't want to see people lose their jobs or see workers taken away from the front line which is where many of the problems lie, but if ICU was being overwhelmed and a nurse is on the dole or shuffling papers does it make sense just because they won't wash their hands or wear protective equipment? Or does it pose an unnecessary risk of infection that could easily be mitigated and there would rightly be uproar and recriminations if said nurse were allowed to continue doing their job and endanger patients?
If patients are seeking or undergoing medical treatment there is a much higher chance that they will be in one of the vulnerable categories that puts them at higher risk. It's also an environment that is likely to have covid present and so easier to catch and transmit to others. This makes it potentially a very dangerous environment and all things must be done to reduce that danger.
Not washing your hands has never been acceptable.
Not being vacinnated was OK yesterday today its not.
As for PPE, they worked for months without adequate PPE thanks to the crooks in charge.
What I don't get is that they pushed it all through after the scare stories they "created" about Omicron.
Shouldn't they have waited to find out more first? What happens if it turns out that in real terms that they will be potentially getting rid of people over not much statistical risk. (assuming they are all being tested often still).
What I don't get is that they pushed it all through after the scare stories they "created" about Omicron.
Shouldn't they have waited to find out more first? What happens if it turns out that in real terms that they will be potentially getting rid of people over not much statistical risk. (assuming they are all being tested often still).
Trouble is we wait to find out more and if it's bad it's already too late. The first wave should've taught us that.
This is something where you have to err on the side of caution and assume the worst, cos if you don't chances are the lack of precaution is going to make it way worse.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?