Coronavirus Thread (Off Topic, Politics) (6 Viewers)

David O'Day

Well-Known Member
I was up for paying more tax if it goes to the right places before this and I will be after.
Generally people are. If you target a tax and say for example "we are going to increase ni by x amount but all extra money raised will be spent on the nhs and adult social care" the public is supportive of this.

Sent from my SM-G975F using Tapatalk
 

David O'Day

Well-Known Member
It really doesn't - the way the 'cost' of the JRS has been described is utterly misleading. It is spending money directly in to the economy and a lot of it will come back to the treasury in any case (people pay income tax on the 80% subject to thresholds for a start). I think it's reasonable to live with it, this is an unprecedented crisis akin to a war type impact on the economy. We need solutions similar to the postwar consensus to stimulate the economy, not the tired austerity orthodoxy of post financial crisis.

It's quantitative easing at a consumer level where it really ought to have been after the financial crisis, it's funny but I don't hear anybody crowing over the QE to banks which has so far cost £645bn to very little economic benefit to the majority (look at the stagnation of wages across the public and private sector) . The headline (misleading as described above) figures for the JRS are chicken feed in comparison.
Yep the multipliers show that the jrs money is a form of stimulus as well.


Sent from my SM-G975F using Tapatalk
 

PVA

Well-Known Member
Yep morally bankrupt but the loans were only finally repaid recently

Sent from my SM-G975F using Tapatalk

Yes and wasn't our war debt to the Americans only paid off fairly recently too?

We can take time to pay these things back. Tories just choose austerity instead.
 

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
It really doesn't - the way the 'cost' of the JRS has been described is utterly misleading. It is spending money directly in to the economy and a lot of it will come back to the treasury in any case (people pay income tax on the 80% subject to thresholds for a start). I think it's reasonable to live with it, this is an unprecedented crisis akin to a war type impact on the economy. We need solutions similar to the postwar consensus to stimulate the economy, not the tired austerity orthodoxy of post financial crisis.

It's quantitative easing at a consumer level where it really ought to have been after the financial crisis, it's funny but I don't hear anybody crowing over the QE to banks which has so far cost £645bn to very little economic benefit to the majority (look at the stagnation of wages across the public and private sector) . The headline (misleading as described above) figures for the JRS are chicken feed in comparison.

I agree, but this is why a UBI should probably have been implemented instead
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
What's wrong with them raising tax to pay for it?

Right now isn’t the time for austerity, you’ll strangle the recovery. We should’ve learned that after 2008.

Tax rises are fine eventually, if they’re engineered properly to claw back unearned wealth and excess. But raising VAT is regressive and will kill consumer spending.
 

hill83

Well-Known Member
Pass me the avocado toast then

Sent from my SM-G975F using Tapatalk

giphy.gif
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
If the tax rate keeps public spending up, that works anyway.

You’re robbing Peter to pay Paul though. We’re about to have TWO of the biggest recessions in our history back to back FGS! Taking money out of people’s pockets to meet some arbitrary timeline for paying back debt that’s cheaper to service than any point in history is downright insane.
 

skybluetony176

Well-Known Member
Which is why we have to find the right balance as being locked down forever will be much worse in the months to come
They couldn’t find the right balance for the “lockdown” as over 40,000 deaths prove. What gives you the confidence that they’ll get the next phase right? Especially given that they’ve already failed by jumping the gun and starting relaxing the lockdown much earlier in the curve than countries with better figures than us.
 

wingy

Well-Known Member
You’re robbing Peter to pay Paul though. We’re about to have TWO of the biggest recessions in our history back to back FGS! Taking money out of people’s pockets to meet some arbitrary timeline for paying back debt that’s cheaper to service than any point in history is downright insane.
Will interest rates remain as they are ?
 

djr8369

Well-Known Member
Most of that will be owed to the bank of england who are owned by the uk government.

You can slowly pay it off as per the slavery reparations which we have only just paid off.

Also if you actually stimulate the economy you increase the tax rate more.

Sent from my SM-G975F using Tapatalk

Yup. Reward the people who have kept things going during the crises with better pay and that money starts moving around the economy doing things.

Our power grid is now interconnected to Europe, invest in the huge potential for wind power and be a net exporter of electricity rather than importer.

Invest in R&D, the last 200 years or so of European world dominance was built on the back of scientific discovery.

Invest in infrastructure and services that will boost the economy. Rural 5G for all the remote workers, new public transport options that will help people travel safely.

But no, they’ll remain welded their small state, invisible hand of the market ideology, provide a few drop in the ocean grants here and there that will mainly go to friends and family and hold the country back while protecting the wealthy and blaming the majority.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
He’s right. You had to be growing up in the 80’s to be gen X rather than born in the 80’s. The millennials received such a bashing during the culture wars that nobody thinks they’re a millennial.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Understood, my jist was folks in the late teens/early-mid 20s around the 2008 recession
 

djr8369

Well-Known Member
The address to the nation at 7-00pm on a Sunday evening was a flagrant grandstanding excercise attempting to avert scrutiny and appear presidential.

The only justice is it backed fired quite badly as no doubt they won’t be held properly to account. Good on the Speaker and Bone picking them up on it. Mogg who is normally such a stickler for rules strangely quiet.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top