Coronavirus Thread (Off Topic, Politics) (4 Viewers)

David O'Day

Well-Known Member
Just listening to Prime Ministers Questions at this crucial time. The local Tory MP for Clywd asked whether the Prime Minister could congratulate the Llangollen Steam Railway for their efforts at this difficult time. Unbelievable that this precious PQT is not being used effectively to scrutinise Boris and his cabinet.
The worst ones are can the pm congratulate himself on the job he has done

Sent from my SM-G975F using Tapatalk
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
I made an effort to watch some...

It is ultimately irrelevant as there are years to go before an election, but Boris is being methodically dismantled, does he just not care or something as he knows its ages before the next election?

It’s an irrelevance full stop - it’s viewed by a handful of wierdos normally on the Parliament channel. As I’ve said Hague was a million times better than Starmer and had Blair on the run - it was a total mismatch - as it was on polling day the other way round

The unfortunate thing for Starmer is not only is it early but no one is engaged at all now anyway and so any bounce is nullified by the crises

Johnson isn’t a conviction politician and regardless of this and any other events I suspect will call it a day before the next election and a successor will benefit from a bounce

Labour have zero chance of an actual working majority in parliament unless the SNP vote collapses - this is not impossible as I suspect dear old Nicola is secretly hoping either the virus lasts for a few more years or a certain ex leader gets it
 

PVA

Well-Known Member
How can it be right for PM to outright lie on public record in the commons?

Sent from my SM-G965F using Tapatalk

It's not, but it'll get brushed under the carpet like always.

Not many people actually follow it as closely as we do, so we know what goes on but the Boris fanboys like Dom who just read what they want to read in the Daily Mail and on Facebook don't know about these constant lies.
 

Ring Of Steel

Well-Known Member
It’s an irrelevance full stop - it’s viewed by a handful of wierdos normally on the Parliament channel. As I’ve said Hague was a million times better than Starmer and had Blair on the run - it was a total mismatch - as it was on polling day the other way round

The unfortunate thing for Starmer is not only is it early but no one is engaged at all now anyway and so any bounce is nullified by the crises

Johnson isn’t a conviction politician and regardless of this and any other events I suspect will call it a day before the next election and a successor will benefit from a bounce

Labour have zero chance of an actual working majority in parliament unless the SNP vote collapses - this is not impossible as I suspect dear old Nicola is secretly hoping either the virus lasts for a few more years or a certain ex leader gets it

You have way more insight than me on the specific politics and I make no pretence of knowing all the detail & history etc

However its obvious that bearing in mind Johnson the man, the person, what has happened and the way he operates, he'll stand down at some point- I would suspect once he's "delivered brexit" and he can put it in his CV and head off into the sunset with the adoration that he seemingly craves so much. I can't see any way he'll be in charge in 5 years, I don't think he wants the hassle.
 

clint van damme

Well-Known Member
I made an effort to watch some...

It is ultimately irrelevant as there are years to go before an election, but Boris is being methodically dismantled, does he just not care or something as he knows its ages before the next election?

I give you a like for not using the words forensic or forensically.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
You have way more insight than me on the specific politics and I make no pretence of knowing all the detail & history etc

However its obvious that bearing in mind Johnson the man, the person, what has happened and the way he operates, he'll stand down at some point- I would suspect once he's "delivered brexit" and he can put it in his CV and head off into the sunset with the adoration that he seemingly craves so much. I can't see any way he'll be in charge in 5 years, I don't think he wants the hassle.

He can make more money from the circuit and his memoirs - he’s outdo Blair

Also of course there is a credible newcomer now to “steer the ship through grave economic times
 

David O'Day

Well-Known Member
You have way more insight than me on the specific politics and I make no pretence of knowing all the detail & history etc

However its obvious that bearing in mind Johnson the man, the person, what has happened and the way he operates, he'll stand down at some point- I would suspect once he's "delivered brexit" and he can put it in his CV and head off into the sunset with the adoration that he seemingly craves so much. I can't see any way he'll be in charge in 5 years, I don't think he wants the hassle.
He doesn't.

He's a moron who lies

Sent from my SM-G975F using Tapatalk
 

djr8369

Well-Known Member
It’s an irrelevance full stop - it’s viewed by a handful of wierdos normally on the Parliament channel. As I’ve said Hague was a million times better than Starmer and had Blair on the run - it was a total mismatch - as it was on polling day the other way round

The unfortunate thing for Starmer is not only is it early but no one is engaged at all now anyway and so any bounce is nullified by the crises

Johnson isn’t a conviction politician and regardless of this and any other events I suspect will call it a day before the next election and a successor will benefit from a bounce

Labour have zero chance of an actual working majority in parliament unless the SNP vote collapses - this is not impossible as I suspect dear old Nicola is secretly hoping either the virus lasts for a few more years or a certain ex leader gets it

A very reasonable comment with some good insight.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

David O'Day

Well-Known Member
A very reasonable comment with some good insight.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
No, no it's not. The Blair governments would of had working majorities without Scottish Mps.

His arguments are simply incorrect.

Sent from my SM-G975F using Tapatalk
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
No, no it's not. The Blair governments would of had working majorities without Scottish Mps.

His arguments are simply incorrect.

Sent from my SM-G975F using Tapatalk

This is not a Blair opposition and never will be and it’s not against a busted flush regime which was Major.

Starmer doesn’t represent a brave new world - keep believing and keep being disappointed
 

Brylowes

Well-Known Member
It was obvious we’re going to have to pay financially for it, let’s just hope the kick isn’t too big and from today we get things reopen and the economy safely moving.... this is why we can’t stay in lockdown forever

Seen somewhere that 1 in 3 companies might not reopen
Do you not think a 2 or if necessary 3 month hard lockdown would have given us more
Chance of being able to safely re-open without the possibility of a significant 2nd wave.

I’m no expert but if I were a betting man I’d be placing some serious wedge on a 2nd
Wave hitting us sometime in the next 6 weeks ‘as a direct consequence of both the
Governments hesitant and relaxed attitude to lockdown and their apparent haste to
Leave it behind.
 

Sky_Blue_Dreamer

Well-Known Member
Turf Parliament out to MK or somewhere. Give it a semicircular chamber and turn the palace into a museum of democracy and the British state.

I'd love it if parliament 'travelled' and was held in a different region each term/year. Would go a long way to removing that London-centric bubble and you'd be amazed how quick you'd get investment in the regions doing it. You could make it part of the redevelopment programme of cities so the MP's would actually see what it's like living in places that are struggling and constantly overlooked for investment.
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
I think it’s referred to as parliamentary privilege.

No that just stops people suing you, it’s still against the code of conduct to mislead the house. Convention for ministers is generally they resign. Not sure about Prime Ministers, or for that matter people who clearly couldn’t give a fuck about parliamentary convention.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top