Seeing as I’m on one today. Can you please start saying ‘have’ instead of ‘of’. You come across as relatively handy in a lot of subjects but using ‘of’ absolutely kills anything you say for me.
Have you considered becoming a teacher? Great feedback with a target for improvement.
Don’t like children.
Access to the EU was far from a given, especially on favourable terms. Access to a much larger central pot is difficult to deny the perks of Dave my man.
Seeing as I’m on one today. Can you please start saying ‘have’ instead of ‘of’. You come across as relatively handy in a lot of subjects but using ‘of’ absolutely kills anything you say for me.
The terms that an independent Scotland would HAVE joined the EU on have no baring on their access to EU help.
In conclusion Scotland would have been able to access to the international gilts and bonds market, we just don't know what the interest rate they would have had to pay. The financial markets buy bonds that are considered junk all the time, not that this is the level that the ratings agencies would have given Scotland.
The terms that an independent Scotland would HAVE joined the EU on have no baring on their access to EU help.
In conclusion Scotland would have been able to access to the international gilts and bonds market, we just don't know what the interest rate they would have had to pay. The financial markets buy bonds that are considered junk all the time, not that this is the level that the ratings agencies would have given Scotland.
Which region?!?
Well we can really, we're a sovereign currency issuer.You do realise they are borrowing the Furlough scheme money? We can't afford it either.
I have forgotten the password for the collective login we had at work, so not sureWhich region?!?
Good that the planning is going in. Doesn’t mean it’s a reality though. I’m still going for cautious optimism
Tease! (side?)I have forgotten the password for the collective login we had at work, so not sure
Sent from my ELE-L29 using Tapatalk
Well we can really, we're a sovereign currency issuer.
Sent from my ELE-L29 using Tapatalk
tbf yesterday I was reading that it's screens, back to back or side by side, but if you're facing one another, it has to be 2m.The 1m+ distancing is very different to what was advertised yesterday. It seems venues are allowed to have people inside and sat down less than 2m apart as long as the venue mitigates i.e. with screens etc. It does not allow for people to just stand less than 2m apart.
tbf yesterday I was reading that it's screens, back to back or side by side, but if you're facing one another, it has to be 2m.
I dunno, we'll find out, but it still doesn't sound fun to me!
I’ve been shielding (on medical advice ) since the lockdown began, my son had to move out
6 weeks ago when he returned to work, my 8 y/o daughter hasn’t been able to go out ‘even
for a walk, we haven’t been able to seen any other family members inc my elderly mum.
We also happen to run a pub ‘called the hospital yesterday to seek advice on what we are
Supposed to do now that pubs are reopening ‘was advised it was fine as long as I adhere
To social distancing.
Turns out shielding was never really about keeping me safe,
It was always about keeping the NHS safe.
That’s just absolute bollocks and you know it, it’s been a national effort the whole country has made to keep everyone safe and to protect our NHS, to say the government couldn’t give a toss about individuals is embarrassingThat was specifically put in the message.
Now it's about keeping the economy safe.
They couldn't give a monkey's about individuals.
Why reopen when SAGE don't think it's safe to? Professor Edmund's etc were quote scathing.That’s just absolute bollocks and you know it, it’s been a national effort the whole country has made to keep everyone safe and to protect our NHS, to say the government couldn’t give a toss about individuals is embarrassing
That’s just absolute bollocks and you know it, it’s been a national effort the whole country has made to keep everyone safe and to protect our NHS, to say the government couldn’t give a toss about individuals is embarrassing
Agreed !!As shit as that is that’s been the case from the very beginning. The first slogan basically said that.
That’s just absolute bollocks and you know it, it’s been a national effort the whole country has made to keep everyone safe and to protect our NHS, to say the government couldn’t give a toss about individuals is embarrassing
That sounds familiar ‘Where have I heard this argument beforeThe economic case for independence was weak when I voted against it and it is even weaker now. Ignoring that the Scottish nationalists will argue for it no matter how poor the case is, because at heart it’s driven by anti English sentiment.
That sounds familiar ‘Where have I heard this argument before
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?