It’s not is it, it’s that specific example I spoke about and you’ve tried your best to twist that into me saying the government have acted perfectly in every single Procurement exercise they’ve ever carried out.
Classic straw man argument because you couldn’t say anything about the actual case being discussed.
I’m out
Doesn’t make any common sense.
Yup. That's one thing we'd have surely learned from last time. Do it or, frankly, why bother after the event?if you're gonna do it, get on & do it FFS.
The strategy seems to be take random, relatively light measures while hoping for the best, despite the weight of overwhelming evidence that the “strategy” isn’t working.Had a nice simple message, protect the NHS.
Now we seem to be protecting the NHS / protecting the economy / allowing for eye test trips / keeping schools and universities open etc. etc.
I've no real idea what our strategy is just atm. Maybe it'll become clearer at 3pm(!)
The strategy seems to be take random, relatively light measures while hoping for the best, despite the weight of overwhelming evidence that the “strategy” isn’t working.
For me, the biggest failure is the lack of preparation done over the summer while we were doing OK. There’s no real plan for uni students, no backup plan for schools. The delayed app is poor. The messaging became incoherent etc.
I see a new one has come to light today. Basically a contract for face masks given to a company without tender who’s owners/management have links to Liz Truss. The government overpaid for the masks by a whopping £30+ million. Just to be clear this is above the governments own figures of what they’ve been paying during the pandemic.
This lot are doing some sterling work on it. They’re keeping us in the dark - Good Law ProjectBut that's just one specific case. It doesn't mean any of the rest are like that. Except for all the ones that are.
Although that is a worrying statistic I think the NHS is much better placed to deal with it from better treatments, more respirators, other forms of breathing assistance that negates the use of respirators and the extra work involved in keeping people on respirators, adequate and available PPE etc. Not that any of that should cause complacency.There are now more people in hospital with Covid-19 than there were when the UK went into lockdown in March...
There are now more people in hospital with Covid-19 than there were when the UK went into lockdown in March...
It certainly puts to bed any hopes it's any less virulant now than in March, however.Although that is a worrying statistic I think the NHS is much better placed to deal with it from better treatments, more respirators, other forms of breathing assistance that negates the use of respirators and the extra work involved in keeping people on respirators, adequate and available PPE etc. Not that any of that should cause complacency.
Did he give anymore information as that seems at odds with most things I've read recently.Van Tam says those under 16 have minimal role in infection. So fucking let me do my job properly then
I've got nothing to back this up but did the numbers not drop as far in places where manufacturing or other roles that can't be done from home are more prominent? Hope they aren't trying to send a message that stupid northerners didn't follow the rules so its their own fault.Incidentally, did he really say that the rate hadn't died down as much in the North when we relaxed lockdown, and that's why they're suffering now?
Incidentally, did he really say that the rate hadn't died down as much in the North when we relaxed lockdown, and that's why they're suffering now?
That's the frustrating thing nationally, that we seemed to be only a couple of weeks from knocking the rates back to where the likes of Italy were but, because they were opening up, we decided to as well!I posted this a week or so back......Andy Burnham & Steve Rotherham warned of the dangers of releasing lockdown too soon back in the summer as the North West was lagging London & SE by about 3 weeks........but what would the Regional leaders & directors of public health know eh?
Yeh, you're right. Don't know much about public procurement. Know a bit about private though, but i'm just going on the information that is out there which apparently everyone else is able to jump to chunky conclusions with...
To be fair its an old ad but it does give an idea of what careers they view as not worthwhile.Government scraps ballet dancer reskilling ad criticised as 'crass'
Culture secretary distanced himself from widely mocked poster amid job losses in artswww.theguardian.com
I'll withdraw the criticism then.To be fair its an old ad but it does give an idea of what careers they view as not worthwhile.
Ah I just posted this again to see if it was real but now see it's old. When was it from?To be fair its an old ad but it does give an idea of what careers they view as not worthwhile.
Yeah absolutely. I think the NHS just understands better now what it’s dealing with and how best to deal with it. The worry is the government will use that to push their luck with delaying decisive action to protect the NHS and waste that cushion.It certainly puts to bed any hopes it's any less virulant now than in March, however.
That’s just nonsense if true.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?