Evo1883
Well-Known Member
I doubt there are more than a handful better at what he doesJust for the record, O'Hare is nowhere near the championships best midfielder for his position.
I doubt there are more than a handful better at what he doesJust for the record, O'Hare is nowhere near the championships best midfielder for his position.
Take a day off from being a prick ffsYou seem a lot more vocal on match threads since robins was sacked
I had to watch the match on my phone so really difficult to pick out individual performances. However, what was apparent to me was how committed we were to the 50:50s in the second half. That was far different to what we were seeing early season under Robins. They really did dig in.
It wasn't pretty but the effort second half was good.
Just for the record, O'Hare is nowhere near the championships best midfielder for his position.
Cheers up lad Grendel's been this way since the BBC 606 forum.Take a day off from being a prick ffs
A boring game, but I’m not sure I understand the negative overreaction.
Things aren’t going to turn around overnight. Absolute first thing to do when things aren’t going well is try to become difficult to beat.
I know the last two opponents haven’t threatened much, but we do look more solid at the back. The passing is better, and the mistakes are reducing.
This season is now just about trying to finish in the top half
Just out this afternoon after 7 days. Come out with a liver issue now too. Hopefully it will all sort itself out over the next few weeks.How's the recovery going?
Fair enoughI was there for the full 90+ in person, I can say for my point of view none of it was good. It was acceptable to walk away with a point. It was a long way from good. It was a poor performance & we had very little bite to anything we did. Turn up & do that to Norwich away & we’ll get spanked.
Just out this afternoon after 7 days. Come out with a liver issue now too. Hopefully it will all sort itself out over the next few weeks.
Thanks for asking and remembering.
If our players were the firing squad the guy in front of them all would die of old age waiting for a shot to be firedA terrible half of football, from both sides (though Coventry at least tried to play some football).
Thought everything about that half was tremendously flat, from the atmosphere in the stadium to both sets of players on the pitch.
Have to say, I was amazed at your players seemingly unable to take quick throw ins and free kicks. What was that all about?
Chances wise, felt we had a couple more than you, with the best being the diving header from Tanganga and the shot by Langstaff at the end.
Can’t see your boys coming out 2nd half and not playing better. Seems you’re missing Clark as we’re missing Emakhu.
Here’s to a better 45 coming up.
There were a couple of opportunities they spurned from my seat one a header early on and one other that I can't remember.Yeah but he didn't, dovin stopped it.
None of anything they had were as good a chance as Rudoni's. I'd rather use my eyes to judge.
No wonder if they were shooting from your seat, especially if you're sat behind the goal. Wonder what the xG would be on that.There were a couple of opportunities they spurned from my seat one a header early on and one other that I can't remember.
People having a fucking meltdown over a goalless draw, while missing our two best forwards. Get a grip ffs.
we could’ve had prime Van Basten upfront today and still wouldn’t score we created faPeople having a fucking meltdown over a goalless draw, while missing our two best forwards. Get a grip ffs.
Inevitably managers bring in players they want - this is what Robins did.It's not a good deck of players now then who Robins should have been doing better with?
It was a very conservative approach in terms of subs, and I thought the decision to replace a technician like Torp with someone chaotic like BTA was the totally wrong move.The biggest disappointment in all that was our super
New managers complete inability to change things up to give us a chance up front. Our set pieces are telegraphed every time, no variation, no ingenuity.
It was a very conservative approach in terms of subs, and I thought the decision to replace a technician like Torp with someone chaotic like BTA was the totally wrong move.
if they put forward players and he doesn't want them they don't get signed.No he will choose from the players the recruitment team put forward , not the players he wants .
Unless he's got time to scout too
The same recruitment team still btw
Then we don't sign playersif they put forward players and he doesn't want them they don't get signed.
Oh. So it will be interesting to see what happens when Lampard brings in signings he's responsible for then.Just so lacking in a player that takes the ball on the turn and drives at the opposition. Hamer was great, O’Hare was OK, Palmer did it when he felt like it, none of our current lot are capable whatever their other talents.
Yes we do. When a player who he rates gets put forwardThen we don't sign players
Oh. So it will be interesting to see what happens when Lampard brings in signings he's responsible for then.
Agreed, even the subs seem pre-planned as they are the same ones he does every game. Straight swap Simms for Bassette, and BTA on the left wing, usually for EMC but clear it was going to be for Torp. Very Robins-esque.Robins aside ffs (getting fuckingboring)
That was a dour performance from us and an organized one by Millwall. The positive was a clean sheet, the negative is that again; Although there was a slight improvement in the second half, Lampard seemingly is either unwilling to employ a plan b, or doesn’t have one.. especially in games where we’re not in the ascendancy.
Sheaf actually managed a shot on target 1st half, straight at the keeper mindPoor. But credit to Millwall for frustrating us. We needed Simms on much earlier, perhaps Lampard will realise this now. Midfield were sorely lacking quality today. No one turned the ball over and drived between the lines. Our tactics never changed all game. Really poor and I can't remember a shot on target in 90 minutes apart from Rudoni's miss?
Rudoni's shot wasn't on target, it hit the woodwork. The only shot on target we had was Sheafs in the first half.Poor. But credit to Millwall for frustrating us. We needed Simms on much earlier, perhaps Lampard will realise this now. Midfield were sorely lacking quality today. No one turned the ball over and drived between the lines. Our tactics never changed all game. Really poor and I can't remember a shot on target in 90 minutes apart from Rudoni's miss?
Torp was fucking useless todayIt was a very conservative approach in terms of subs, and I thought the decision to replace a technician like Torp with someone chaotic like BTA was the totally wrong move.
Millwall are well organised and happy to let us have the ball. Not sure why people are moaning, it’s a hard game to play. It’ll probably finish 1-0.
I’d bring on Simms or BTA and shuffle Rudoni back into midfield.
Yes we do. When a player who he rates gets put forward
Anyone know how much of the 75% possession was in our own half?
We seemed to take root there.
A very meh game. Still not as bad as people make out imo and to give credit to Millwall thought they parked a mighty fine bus.