CWR (2 Viewers)

Ccfc1979

Well-Known Member
Apparently, Eakin was slagging off callers who are derogatory to W*sps when he thought he couldn’t be heard on iFollow before the Wycombe game.
 

Sky Blue Pete

Well-Known Member
I think that’s good. Will phone tonight and simply ask what Clive or Stuart expect Sisu to do to return to coventry. If it’s anything in the past then will just politely point out that he seems to be asking the club to sign an indemnity clause that will bankrupt them and wouldn’t he be better asking mr Eastwood and wasps to remove the clause so that the draft agreement can be put in place and a return to coventry happen
 

HuckerbyDublinWhelan

Well-Known Member
I think that’s good. Will phone tonight and simply ask what Clive or Stuart expect Sisu to do to return to coventry. If it’s anything in the past then will just politely point out that he seems to be asking the club to sign an indemnity clause that will bankrupt them and wouldn’t he be better asking mr Eastwood and wasps to remove the clause so that the draft agreement can be put in place and a return to coventry happen
Is it on tonight?
 

Ccfc1979

Well-Known Member
I didn’t hear it but my Dad said he was he was being childish putting on a stupid voice saying he didn’t care about the opinion of callers and texters blaming W*sps for the ground issue. Others must have heard it as it was when he thought they’d gone to an advert / break and he couldn’t be heard.
 

HuckerbyDublinWhelan

Well-Known Member
I didn’t hear it but my Dad said he was he was being childish putting on a stupid voice saying he didn’t care about the opinion of callers and texters blaming W*sps for the ground issue. Others must have heard it as it was when he thought they’d gone to an advert / break and he couldn’t be heard.
Well then let’s drill it home. Don’t blame Wasps. Understand it’s there position - but it’s up to them to change it.

Or we don’t return
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
Just tweeted Neil to ask what the Trust can do to persuade Wasps to drop the clause and allow us back to the Ricoh. I'll let you know if i get a response!

You won’t
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
Ha ha ha Linnell just denies the clause
 

Sky Blue Pete

Well-Known Member
Ok Stuart adamant it’s not the indemnity clause that is the issue but that Ccfc won’t promise to not take any further legal action. I think he’s wrong and it’s probably also wrong to stipulate that as part of any agreement to play at Ricoh but we shall see. Was he referring to nick when he was talking about the social media guy?
 

HuckerbyDublinWhelan

Well-Known Member
Ok Stuart adamant it’s not the indemnity clause that is the issue but that Ccfc won’t promise to not take any further legal action. I think he’s wrong and it’s probably also wrong to stipulate that as part of any agreement to play at Ricoh but we shall see. Was he referring to nick when he was talking about the social media guy?
Didn’t CCFC sign a document to suggest that they wouldn’t take further legal action against Wasps
 

Nick

Administrator
Ok Stuart adamant it’s not the indemnity clause that is the issue but that Ccfc won’t promise to not take any further legal action. I think he’s wrong and it’s probably also wrong to stipulate that as part of any agreement to play at Ricoh but we shall see. Was he referring to nick when he was talking about the social media guy?
So what does he think about sisu signing something which meant wasps then opened talks?

I'm not sure I'm a social media guy?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top