Do you want to discuss boring politics? (27 Viewers)

stay_up_skyblues

Well-Known Member
Surely that’s like somebody claiming a refund on their fuel to drive to work.

No it’s predominantly for travel to/from site investigations, although we do claim to/from office if we are officially home workers, albeit we only go in for meetings rather than desk work. I have been for 10+ years though.

We’ve traditionally had fuel cards and had personal miles deducted from salary. But we now have plug in hybrids and it switched to paying our own fuel costs but claiming back the business miles. It’s to do with them being unable to reimburse electric miles via the fuel card scheme.
 

Terry Gibson's perm

Well-Known Member
No it’s predominantly for travel to/from site investigations, although we do claim to/from office if we are officially home workers, albeit we only go in for meetings rather than desk work. I have been for 10+ years though.

We’ve traditionally had fuel cards and had personal miles deducted from salary. But we now have plug in hybrids and it switched to paying our own fuel costs but claiming back the business miles. It’s to do with them being unable to reimburse electric miles via the fuel card scheme.


Our mileage rate at work is awful 46p per mile for the first 100 miles per day and 13p after that, hasn’t changed in 4 years.
 

stay_up_skyblues

Well-Known Member
Our mileage rate at work is awful 46p per mile for the first 100 miles per day and 13p after that, hasn’t changed in 4 years.

Yeah that sounds like the HMRC rate if you’re using your own vehicle. It’s 17p a mile in a 2 litre petrol company car atm. Haven’t done the maths but I’ve no doubt it doesn’t cover it at £1.85 a litre. I just make sure the battery is fully charged before I leave the drive everyday to make sure the first 30 miles I do are in electric!
 

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
Yeah that sounds like the HMRC rate if you’re using your own vehicle. It’s 17p a mile in a 2 litre petrol company car atm. Haven’t done the maths but I’ve no doubt it doesn’t cover it at £1.85 a litre. I just make sure the battery is fully charged before I leave the drive everyday to make sure the first 30 miles I do are in electric!
The HMRC rates are ridiculously low, it was around 40p per mile 20 years ago
 

Otis

Well-Known Member
Neck and neck in the polls with all that’s been going on-imagine what it’ll be like once the scandals have blown over and the Tories are back in campaign mode. 5 more years
Yes, but I would say one thing and that is that there are an awful lot of women saying they simply will not vote for Labour because of their policy on recognising women re the trans issue.

My missus says that just one thread on Mumsnet has over 3,000 women protesting and really angry with Labour, saying they will not vote for them. It's a massive, massive issue.
 

Alan Dugdales Moustache

Well-Known Member
Yes, but I would say one thing and that is that there are an awful lot of women saying they simply will not vote for Labour because of their policy on recognising women re the trans issue.

My missus says that just one thread on Mumsnet has over 3,000 women protesting and really angry with Labour, saying they will not vote for them. It's a massive, massive issue.
Is that issue men becoming women or women becoming men . I'm never sure . What are women not happy about or is that trans women ?
 

Alan Dugdales Moustache

Well-Known Member
Neck and neck in the polls with all that’s been going on-imagine what it’ll be like once the scandals have blown over and the Tories are back in campaign mode. 5 more years
I think the problem is that Starmer doesn't seem to have much in the way of charisma. They need someone who can stand up in the house of commons and speak without reading from notes , can engage in the streets with people in a warm and genuine manner . I always thought Neil Kinnock was a natural speaker and had the ability to articulate and engage in a way people could relate to . Trouble was he was surrounded by lunatics. If they had someone like Kinnock in charge now, not in terms of policy but personality, they'd be miles ahead. It's about trust as much as anything else given what politicians have been up to in the last two years.
 

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
I think the problem is that Starmer doesn't seem to have much in the way of charisma. They need someone who can stand up in the house of commons and speak without reading from notes , can engage in the streets with people in a warm and genuine manner . I always thought Neil Kinnock was a natural speaker and had the ability to articulate and engage in a way people could relate to . If they had someone like that in charge now they'd be miles ahead.

Pretty much yes. It all seems, pun intended, very laboured when he interacts with anyone outside Parliament and not much better when in it either. If Andy Burnham could be lured away from Manchester I’d be interested to see the results but I doubt he wants the hassle.

The whole problem is like Biden vs Trump, Starmer runs on who he isn’t rather than who he is. Then laughing at sections of his core vote on top.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
Does Rachel Reeves ever answer a single question
 

Terry_dactyl

Well-Known Member
That’s what happens when an inept tosser like Drakesford is in charge - he makes Sturgeon look competent
He seems to be very popular in wales. I think he’s seen as being competent and an antidote to the clown PM.
I thought it was interesting that before Brexit was implemented he was saying that the SNP weren’t delivering on day-to-day running of Scotland. He said that if Brexit meant the break up of the uk, it would be Northern Ireland that would go first…
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
He seems to be very popular in wales. I think he’s seen as being competent and an antidote to the clown PM.
I thought it was interesting that before Brexit was implemented he was saying that the SNP weren’t delivering on day-to-day running of Scotland. He said that if Brexit meant the break up of the uk, it would be Northern Ireland that would go first…

He’s dreadful being popular in wales is hardly difficult
 

Otis

Well-Known Member
Is that issue men becoming women or women becoming men . I'm never sure . What are women not happy about or is that trans women ?
Women having the problem of a man saying they now identify as a woman and therefore being able to access women's toilets and women's changing rooms etc. And women losing their identity as women.

It's a very hot topic and I believe the Tories are the only party that have come out in favour of women on this issue.
 

jimmyhillsfanclub

Well-Known Member
Yep....boris at least stated that trans women should not compete in woman's sports....which is correct.

I think starmer is too concerned that he'll break the woke code so he won't even agree with statements of basic scientific facts regarding trans issues....

....ironic he's such a pussy on the issue really
 

Alan Dugdales Moustache

Well-Known Member
Women having the problem of a man saying they now identify as a woman and therefore being able to access women's toilets and women's changing rooms etc. And women losing their identity as women.

It's a very hot topic and I believe the Tories are the only party that have come out in favour of women on this issue.
In favour of real women ?😂
 

Alan Dugdales Moustache

Well-Known Member

Sky Blue Pete

Well-Known Member
Yes, but I would say one thing and that is that there are an awful lot of women saying they simply will not vote for Labour because of their policy on recognising women re the trans issue.

My missus says that just one thread on Mumsnet has over 3,000 women protesting and really angry with Labour, saying they will not vote for them. It's a massive, massive issue.
That’s mad
 

Ian1779

Well-Known Member
Women having the problem of a man saying they now identify as a woman and therefore being able to access women's toilets and women's changing rooms etc. And women losing their identity as women.

It's a very hot topic and I believe the Tories are the only party that have come out in favour of women on this issue.
There are lot of rules and restrictions in place to protect people… you can’t simply say ‘I’m a lady’ and then start wandering around female spaces unchecked.
That doesn’t help people that feel concerned I know - but then it’s mercilessly whipped up by a media that loves to prey on peoples fears…
 

Otis

Well-Known Member
There are lot of rules and restrictions in place to protect people… you can’t simply say ‘I’m a lady’ and then start wandering around female spaces unchecked.
That doesn’t help people that feel concerned I know - but then it’s mercilessly whipped up by a media that loves to prey on peoples fears…
That is true, but then, on the flip side of the coin, some female MP's are getting death threats for speaking out about their concerns for the protection of women .

"Canterbury MP Rosie Duffield has been both criticised and heralded for her views on trans rights.

Ms Duffield came under fire for her opposition to "male-bodied biological men" being allowed to self-identify as female in order to access women-only spaces such as prisons and domestic violence refuges.

She opted not to attend the Labour Party conference in September after receiving threats and being branded transphobic, which she denies."

Seems that for many, even speaking of concerns results in them being labelled as transphobic.
 

Ian1779

Well-Known Member
That is true, but then, on the flip side of the coin, some female MP's are getting death threats for speaking out about their concerns for the protection of women .

"Canterbury MP Rosie Duffield has been both criticised and heralded for her views on trans rights.

Ms Duffield came under fire for her opposition to "male-bodied biological men" being allowed to self-identify as female in order to access women-only spaces such as prisons and domestic violence refuges.

She opted not to attend the Labour Party conference in September after receiving threats and being branded transphobic, which she denies."

Seems that for many, even speaking of concerns results in them being labelled as transphobic.
People have the right to be safe at all times - this should supersede everything else in the first instance.
 

David O'Day

Well-Known Member
Yes, but I would say one thing and that is that there are an awful lot of women saying they simply will not vote for Labour because of their policy on recognising women re the trans issue.

My missus says that just one thread on Mumsnet has over 3,000 women protesting and really angry with Labour, saying they will not vote for them. It's a massive, massive issue.
There's not an awful lot of them, they like a sock account and the people on that thread are likely it.


There's a vocal handful on twitter as well who are all thick as mince
 

Sky_Blue_Dreamer

Well-Known Member
Surely that’s like somebody claiming a refund on their fuel to drive to work.
It's swings and roundabouts isn't it. WFH pay a bit more in electric etc, those travelling to work pay a fortune in fuel/travel costs. Plus travelling to work takes time.

So if WFH get a contribution to their electric bills, those going to a workplace should be paid the travel costs and time spent doing so.
 

Sky_Blue_Dreamer

Well-Known Member
Does Rachel Reeves ever answer a single question
I think that's hardly something that's a rarity in political circles. Johnson spent the whole election campaign answering every single question with the same three words.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
I think that's hardly something that's a rarity in political circles. Johnson spent the whole election campaign answering every single question with the same three words.

She is worse - she’s ridiculous
 
  • Haha
Reactions: PVA

Users who are viewing this thread

  • Top