Do you want to discuss boring politics? (157 Viewers)

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
It’s a public sector project. Of course private sector is going to deliver it as you can’t just employ tens of thousands of random people to deliver a massive project but there has been no control of spending from the top

‘High Speed Two (HS2) Limited is the company responsible for developing and promoting the UK's new high speed rail network. It is funded by grant-in-aid from the government. HS2 Ltd is an executive non-departmental public body, sponsored by the Department for Transport’

ps we also live in a country where everything is painfully slow to deliver

Have you ever worked in private industry? That happens all the time.
 

skybluetony176

Well-Known Member
No, the government creates gilts to give institutions like pension funds long term safe investments (bonds), this is a choice it makes which has some merit. It does not need to borrow £ from anybody, it can create a £ at the strike of a key in the Bank of England.
So like I said then, they’re borrowing the money.
 

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
The capacity agreement only works if people are prepared to use alternative routes. There's an existing cheaper, and slower, route from Cov to London. You don't get much overcrowding on that one as the vast majority of people use the quickest route.

Are they going to come up with some ridiculous pricing structure to force people onto certain trains?

can't help think putting this much money into improving existing infrastructure and running better and more frequestnt services would have been a better option
 

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
It’s a public sector project. Of course private sector is going to deliver it as you can’t just employ tens of thousands of random people to deliver a massive project but there has been no control of spending from the top

‘High Speed Two (HS2) Limited is the company responsible for developing and promoting the UK's new high speed rail network. It is funded by grant-in-aid from the government. HS2 Ltd is an executive non-departmental public body, sponsored by the Department for Transport’

ps we also live in a country where everything is painfully slow to deliver

Do you think the grant-in-aid is open ended?


There is a budget like anything else. Its last published accounts stated that it delivered what it had intended to broadly within the budget for the year.

It's a myth that the private sector perfectly manages budgets, the only reason that perception exists is because it does not have to report so publicly like the public sector does. Everybody is subject to the same cost pressures.
 

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
Government borrowing as a term includes issuing debt securities like bonds. Selling a financial product = borrowing….surely you’re not disputing that

I am not disputing it I am saying that the borrowing is not an actual dependency for spending. The labelling of selling securities as borrowing misrepresents what it happening as the general public assume it to be like you or I going to the bank to borrow money.
 

skybluetony176

Well-Known Member
I am not disputing it I am saying that the borrowing is not an actual dependency for spending. The labelling of selling securities as borrowing misrepresents what it happening as the general public assume it to be like you or I going to the bank to borrow money.
So like I said then. They’re borrowing it.
 

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
So like I said then. They’re borrowing it.

I know you're a natural Tory, Tony, but the government is not a household.

It does not borrow money from anywhere. It creates all of the money it spends. It uses products like bonds to create safe investments which help to reduce the potential inflationary pressures from spending. It does not depend on the borrowing for the spending. The spending will always happen first.
 

CCFCSteve

Well-Known Member
Do you think the grant-in-aid is open ended?


There is a budget like anything else. Its last published accounts stated that it delivered what it had intended to broadly within the budget for the year.

It's a myth that the private sector perfectly manages budgets, the only reason that perception exists is because it does not have to report so publicly like the public sector does. Everybody is subject to the same cost pressures.

Im not saying the private sector is perfect, not by a long way, many businesses aren’t which is why they go bust (public sector never has that worry which is maybe one if the cultural drivers, it’s human nature)

Have a look at defence procurement, the nhs IT system that was canned etc, even all the pandemic stuff. Its frightening
 

CCFCSteve

Well-Known Member
Well you are in some form. I believe HS2 still pays for itself though. Down to 1.3 x but still profitable.

I haven’t got a major issue with HS2. I’d have just done North down as I said earlier. I actually want more infrastructure spending, if it was properly controlled and things completed a bit quicker. I just don’t have much confidence in politicians of any political persuasion and civil servants to deliver this
 

skybluetony176

Well-Known Member
I know you're a natural Tory, Tony, but the government is not a household.

It does not borrow money from anywhere. It creates all of the money it spends. It uses products like bonds to create safe investments which help to reduce the potential inflationary pressures from spending. It does not depend on the borrowing for the spending. The spending will always happen first.
I’ve never suggested by any stretch of the imagination that the government is like a household. You’re adding your own context rather than admit that the government are issuing bonds to borrow the money to build HS2. Which is all I pointed out. The facts are the UK is seen as an unattractive place to invest, including gilts. The BOE tried to support the market by buying up government bonds in October after the Truss/Kwartang soap opera but that was largely unsuccessful. People are not queuing up at the moment to buy government bonds (BOE aside), especially the pension market. This latest car crash in the HS2 history could be as much to do with the cost of government borrowing required to build this section as anything else.

And as for calling me a natural Tory don’t make me laugh when you’ve done more to facilitate this government than I ever have.
 

CCFCSteve

Well-Known Member
I’ve never suggested by any stretch of the imagination that the government is like a household. You’re adding your own context rather than admit that the government are issuing bonds to borrow the money to build HS2. Which is all I pointed out. The facts are the UK is seen as an unattractive place to invest, including gilts. The BOE tried to support the market by buying up government bonds in October after the Truss/Kwartang soap opera but that was largely unsuccessful. People are not queuing up at the moment to buy government bonds (BOE aside), especially the pension market. This latest car crash in the HS2 history could be as much to do with the cost of government borrowing required to build this section as anything else.

And as for calling me a natural Tory don’t make me laugh when you’ve done more to facilitate this government than I ever have.

I won’t get into the bond convo but just a clarity point. The demand is there now people have a bit more confidence following truss/Kwarteng shitshow

 

CCFCSteve

Well-Known Member
North is where it was supposed to be needed more, but they started with London, scrapped the Leeds section... just shows it's bollocks really.

Levelling up, my arse.

Crazy isn’t it. Poor planning and budgeting, now it’s become a bit toxic due to the costs, which is a shame as we do need more infrastructure spending
 

CCFCSteve

Well-Known Member
Not really. Politically expedient to say one thing and do another.

If the project was anywhere near budget, even 20, 30, 40% more then I can’t imagine canning the northern section/parts of it would even be being discussed. Last time I saw the estimate for completion was 2-3 times original budget
 

clint van damme

Well-Known Member
Just like the pandemic, just like the Teeside freeport, HS2 will be a huge opportunity for the tory spivs and speculators to make money and the public will end up footing the bill.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PVA

skybluetony176

Well-Known Member
I won’t get into the bond convo but just a clarity point. The demand is there now people have a bit more confidence following truss/Kwarteng shitshow

Highest in a year isn’t exactly bragging rights though. You have to put that into context. It’s bit like the Tories bragging that they’ve put 10k officers on the streets without acknowledging that they took off 20k first. The fact is this is largely catch-up following the events of last September and October, as the article points out. The other fact is after the pound devalued in 2016 and never really recovered the gilt market has found it a lot more difficult than it did before. The strength of the pound is a major factor in the government’s ability to raise bonds and at what value. The country is fucked. If the government can’t even get a flagship infrastructure another 7 miles down the line the writing is on the wall.

For what it’s worth I agree with you. We’ve just got to bite the bullet and get it finished. Might as well mothball everything already done otherwise.
 
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
If the project was anywhere near budget, even 20, 30, 40% more then I can’t imagine canning the northern section/parts of it would even be being discussed. Last time I saw the estimate for completion was 2-3 times original budget
If you tart with the bits that are needed most, you care more about budget. The fact they start with the least needed, and let it go over without considering whether to keep the northern section or not, shows how little it actually matters.
 

skybluetony176

Well-Known Member
Just like the pandemic, just like the Teeside freeport, HS2 will be a huge opportunity for the tory spivs and speculators to make money and the public will end up footing the bill.
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
I haven’t got a major issue with HS2. I’d have just done North down as I said earlier. I actually want more infrastructure spending, if it was properly controlled and things completed a bit quicker. I just don’t have much confidence in politicians of any political persuasion and civil servants to deliver this

That’s the real problem that needs solving is the time it takes us to do infrastructure projects like this. We should have a proper midlands metro, better regional links, and a high speed spine. Going from London to the midlands is such a culture shock in terms of transport.

Anyway this has been denied by the govt so let’s see.
 

skybluetony176

Well-Known Member
Anyway this has been denied by the govt so let’s see.
Has it? Might have missed it but all I heard Hunt say was that it’s unthinkable that it wouldn’t go to Euston. Didn’t commit to any date so the Sun article stating it won’t be until 2038 may still be right.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
And as for calling me a natural Tory don’t make me laugh when you’ve done more to facilitate this government than I ever have.

You have admitted you naturally are a Tory and the only real deviations up to 2017 were Blair and then Corbyn and of course UKIP (the latter two somewhat ironic given your supposed Brexit stance)
 

Sky_Blue_Dreamer

Well-Known Member
I've always expected the northern parts of HS2 to get canned at some point as rather than improving the north is was all about getting people to London and being able to use BHX as airport capacity for London.

Never did I expect that it wouldn't actually get into Central London. If it doesn't the entire project is pointless.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top