You spent years slagging off everything to do with Corbyn. Now all of a sudden you're in his corner.
You'll do anything to be contrarian.
Dear me you really are a man child
Fucks sake, I've read some shit on here in my time, and posted a fair bit but that takes the biscuit
How is expelling Corbyn advancing the cause of getting him elected?
Do you think anyone has said I know Starmer nt laid out any concrete plans for fixing our ailing economy and crumbling infrastructure but nows he's expelled Corbyn he's getting my vote.
The centrists are far more obsessed with Corbyn than anyone on the left of the party.
He's a pensioner who's never going to get near the front benches again but who's a long standing and popular MP in a little corner of Lo Don, just let him carry on and deal with the a tual issues that are fucking over a large portion of the people in this country.
How is expelling Corbyn advancing the cause of getting him elected?
The SNP won't have had a better chance than the UK in enormous political and economic turmoil. If they can't get independence now I doubt they ever will.Starmer will be wearing a kilt soon and eating Haggis - safe to say Scotland is remaining in the union and Mcuseless is going to lose seats very quickly
You spent years slagging off everything to do with Corbyn. Now all of a sudden you're in his corner.
You'll do anything to be contrarian.
He is only getting air time because Starmer keeps mentioning him. He would otherwise be in pretty much total obscurity around about now and doing no harm to the party besides winning it an extra seat.Because, and I know you don't like to hear this or don't believe it, his name is toxic. Most people want nothing to do with him and want nothing to do with a party that he is part of. It's not a difficult concept to grasp. Or apparently it is.
With respect you said a Starmer government would be no worse than a Braverman government. Now that is one of the biggest loads of shit ever written on here.
Because, and I know you don't like to hear this or don't believe it, his name is toxic. Most people want nothing to do with him and want nothing to do with a party that he is part of. It's not a difficult concept to grasp. Or apparently it is.
With respect you said a Starmer government would be no worse than a Braverman government. Now that is one of the biggest loads of shit ever written on here.
He is only getting air time because Starmer keeps mentioning him. He would otherwise be in pretty much total obscurity around about now and doing no harm to the party besides winning it an extra seat.
It's the end of term so my delirium has reached its peakWhy bother
How many votes do you think Starmer will gain by expelling Corbyn?
As regard the Braverman comment can you link the post?
And what is a Braverman government?
I don’t think I suggested anything different.Perhaps we're at cross purposes
The gig is up for Corbyn in Labour: Agreed
The gig is up for Corbyn in Islington North: No
Corbyn's been stripped of the whip and was publicly distanced from the new management of the party. I think pretty much most people who cared in the first place understand that he is far removed from the top of the party now.I have no idea. But they've obviously decided it's a net gain. I think you underestimate just how many people despise Corbyn.
And here is the Braverman stuff
Do you want to discuss boring politics?
I have grave misgivings about the country being run by a man who once forgot his wife's nationality. The scary thing is, in terms of competence he's as good as it gets, and in a contest of bland white men in suits, the electorate would go for the blue rosette.www.skybluestalk.co.uk
The people that despise Corbyn the most are centrist Dads like you because your guy is about as inspirational as cholera.I have no idea. But they've obviously decided it's a net gain. I think you underestimate just how many people despise Corbyn.
And here is the Braverman stuff
Do you want to discuss boring politics?
I have grave misgivings about the country being run by a man who once forgot his wife's nationality. The scary thing is, in terms of competence he's as good as it gets, and in a contest of bland white men in suits, the electorate would go for the blue rosette.www.skybluestalk.co.uk
I have no idea. But they've obviously decided it's a net gain. I think you underestimate just how many people despise Corbyn.
And here is the Braverman stuff
Do you want to discuss boring politics?
I have grave misgivings about the country being run by a man who once forgot his wife's nationality. The scary thing is, in terms of competence he's as good as it gets, and in a contest of bland white men in suits, the electorate would go for the blue rosette.www.skybluestalk.co.uk
The people that despise Corbyn the most are centrist Dads like you because your guy is about as inspirational as cholera.
If Starmer literally had any vision, guile, personality or belief system he would have left Corbyn alone to potter about in North Islington but instead he’s picking a fight with him because that’s all he has to offer.
It’s utterly pathetic on his part, and almost as pathetic watching you tie yourself in knots trying to talk him up.
You are - it’s all you ever do.I'm not talking Starmer up, I'm talking Corbyn down.
I'm not talking Starmer up, I'm talking Corbyn down.
I can't be arsed with this anymore. It's ridiculous.
Corbyn had his chance, twice, and fucked it. He had his chance to apologise for his behaviour and keep his place in the party, he fucked that too. Good riddance.
You are - it’s all you ever do.
Starmer will never ever get as many votes in a single election as Corbyn did in 2017.
And yet nothing…. Any time you want that charity bet feel free to step up.And yet...
The people that despise Corbyn the most are centrist Dads like you because your guy is about as inspirational as cholera.
If Starmer literally had any vision, guile, personality or belief system he would have left Corbyn alone to potter about in North Islington but instead he’s picking a fight with him because that’s all he has to offer.
It’s utterly pathetic on his part, and almost as pathetic watching you tie yourself in knots trying to talk him up.
People like PVA will never be happy no matter how many times Corbyn apologises. They will just move or tweak the conditions.He apologised in 2018, do you want him to make it an annual event?
Just leave this here againView attachment 28848
Who should be getting more of Starmer's attention, Corbyn or Sunak?I can't be arsed with this anymore. It's ridiculous.
Corbyn had his chance, twice, and fucked it. He had his chance to apologise for his behaviour and keep his place in the party, he fucked that too. Good riddance.
If anything the Tory approach is to reward the party extremists by putting them on the front benchI've no time for Sunak, but can you imagine him getting into a national bun fight with, say, Desmond Swayne? Course not, he may be a tory prick but he's not stupid.
And yet...
And yet nothing…. Any time you want that charity bet feel free to step up.
That may well be true. And I will be able to look forward to him not making a single measurable change in my life or that of my children.And yet he's going to win an election.
Congratulations on Corbyn for not winning an election. Worthy of celebration indeed.
I said I'd gladly give some money to charity without the bet.
This Conservative government is on track to be the worst since World War 2. Labour's lead is pretty much down to that.And yet he's going to win an election.
Congratulations on Corbyn for not winning an election. Worthy of celebration indeed.
I said I'd gladly give some money to charity without the bet.
To get elected he needs to get people to vote for him, and when push comes to shove how is he going to do it?Maybe he will, maybe he won't.
But he can't do fuck all if he doesn't get elected.
Perfect policy in opposition is pointless. Something the Corbyn cult don't seem to have grasped.
Just seen some of the footage of Theresa Coffey at a select committee today. I didn’t think it possible but I think that there’s possibly a minister who understands less about their responsibilities and brief of their department than Dorries did about hers. She makes Nads look competent.
Citation neededBecause, and I know you don't like to hear this or don't believe it, his name is toxic. Most people want nothing to do with him and want nothing to do with a party that he is part of. It's not a difficult concept to grasp. Or apparently it is.
With respect you said a Starmer government would be no worse than a Braverman government. Now that is one of the biggest loads of shit ever written on here.
Yes I've just said we're at cross purposesI don’t think I suggested anything different.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?