I guess it could just be that outsiders might see it as support of the move.
People can do what they want, but for me if I went to Sixfields I'd feel like I was saying I support the move away from Coventry so that is why I don't go. It's all down to personal interpretation though.
Actually, from what I have seen from talking to people up here and seen on other clubs forums, outside perception is currently that we are shit fans who don't support our club.
But, to be honest, who gives a shit what other clubs fans think.
This 'rapid end' people are talking about could well be the end of the club alltogether. Not a sudden change of heart by the ballbags making the decisions and a helicopter back to the Ricoh with handjobs all round.
Back on topic. I don't hold a grudge. People can do what they want.
Not everyone wants to get so involved in thepolitics though . It is just something they enjoy doing.
This 'rapid end' people are talking about could well be the end of the club alltogether. Not a sudden change of heart by the ballbags making the decisions and a helicopter back to the Ricoh with handjobs all round.
Back on topic. I don't hold a grudge. People can do what they want.
Does anyone hold a grudge against people against people who attend games in Northampton ??
Give me liquidation and a reformed side playing in the Southern Premier League over this any day of the week.
Me too. Time for a breakaway club
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Don't disagree wit the latter point. No grudge. However, as has been posted before; total abstinence - that is zero home fans - would bring about a level of publicity that would bring all parties (whoever you consider culpable) toward a quicker resolution. For every fan who does attend, that effect is negated. As long as they acknowledge their actions do have a consequence, that's fine. Do what they wish. Live with the consequqjmce...
Me too. Time for a breakaway club
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Don't disagree wit the latter point. No grudge. However, as has been posted before; total abstinence - that is zero home fans - would bring about a level of publicity that would bring all parties (whoever you consider culpable) toward a quicker resolution. For every fan who does attend, that effect is negated. As long as they acknowledge their actions do have a consequence, that's fine. Do what they wish. Live with the consequqjmce...
How does a level of publicity brought about by total abstinence bring all parties
toward a quicker resolution? I'd really like to understand it and being a bit dense up top I hope you can help me get the point
Firstly what and where do you think the publicity will be? And which are the parties you think will be pushed towards a quicker resolution by it
How does a level of publicity brought about by total abstinence bring all parties toward a quicker resolution? I'd really like to understand it and being a bit dense up top I hope you can help me get the point
Firstly what and where do you think the publicity will be? And which are the parties you think will be pushed towards a quicker resolution by it
Media pressure on the football league dumb dumb.....
The football league aren't fussed though are they? Places like that go by their own laws and make the rules up to suit.
It seems as though a large proportion think if zero fans turned up, we'd be back at the Ricoh quicker than you can say "not one penny more unless its Arsenal away"!
Just out of curiosity, why? Enlighten me.
Judging from SISU's actions with our club I just can't see this to be the case whatsoever.
Please attempt to answer this question without wild speculation and some ideal sky blue tinted specs world in your head. It would be appreciated.
A fair response but you lose marks for making me have to scroll up with my arthritic scroll finger.
The way I see it (and I could be very very wrong) is SISU are here to play hard ball, drive down the price of the Ricoh and get it on the cheap whilst postuering with all this new stadium fallacy. Zero fans would honestly mean nothing to them and believe the actions they have taken so far has shown that.
The difference between 0 fans and 1500 fans turning up compared to the 10000 to 150000 we were getting last season (which would probably be more this season at the Ricoh with the brand of football and entertainment the current team are showing) has obviously had zero effect on SISU currently and going from 1500 to 0 would in my opinion have no effect on what I surmise to be SISU's 'end game'.
The Football League have already shown themselves to be spineless or more importantly, powerless to intervene. If there were zero fans turning up, what could the FA or FL actually do? What permissions do they have? What sanctions can they legally carry out? I'm yet to see anything that suggests they would be able to intervene in a way that would see us move back to Coventry without the owners say so. SISU are seemingly happy to take the mammoth losses and bad publicity in order to get the Ricoh on the cheap as they see that as a more lucrative end for them in this saga.
So with SISU playing hard ball regardless and the FL spineless and ultimately powerless,I just can't see anything that suggests zero fans would speed up this process one iota, which is a real shame but unfortunately (and probably) indicative of the modern world of football that we live in.
A fair response but you lose marks for making me have to scroll up with my arthritic scroll finger.
The way I see it (and I could be very very wrong) is SISU are here to play hard ball, drive down the price of the Ricoh and get it on the cheap whilst postuering with all this new stadium fallacy. Zero fans would honestly mean nothing to them and believe the actions they have taken so far has shown that.
The difference between 0 fans and 1500 fans turning up compared to the 10000 to 150000 we were getting last season (which would probably be more this season at the Ricoh with the brand of football and entertainment the current team are showing) has obviously had zero effect on SISU currently and going from 1500 to 0 would in my opinion have no effect on what I surmise to be SISU's 'end game'.
The Football League have already shown themselves to be spineless or more importantly, powerless to intervene. If there were zero fans turning up, what could the FA or FL actually do? What permissions do they have? What sanctions can they legally carry out? I'm yet to see anything that suggests they would be able to intervene in a way that would see us move back to Coventry without the owners say so. SISU are seemingly happy to take the mammoth losses and bad publicity in order to get the Ricoh on the cheap as they see that as a more lucrative end for them in this saga.
So with SISU playing hard ball regardless and the FL spineless and ultimately powerless,I just can't see anything that suggests zero fans would speed up this process one iota, which is a real shame but unfortunately (and probably) indicative of the modern world of football that we live in.
A fair response but you lose marks for making me have to scroll up with my arthritic scroll finger.
The way I see it (and I could be very very wrong) is SISU are here to play hard ball, drive down the price of the Ricoh and get it on the cheap whilst posturing with all this new stadium fallacy. Zero fans would honestly mean nothing to them and believe the actions they have taken so far has shown that.
The difference between 0 fans and 1500 fans turning up compared to the 10000 to 150000 we were getting last season (which would probably be more this season at the Ricoh with the brand of football and entertainment the current team are showing) has obviously had zero effect on SISU currently and going from 1500 to 0 would in my opinion have no effect on what I surmise to be SISU's 'end game'.
The Football League have already shown themselves to be spineless or more importantly, powerless to intervene. If there were zero fans turning up, what could the FA or FL actually do? What permissions do they have? What sanctions can they legally carry out? I'm yet to see anything that suggests they would be able to intervene in a way that would see us move back to Coventry without the owners say so. SISU are seemingly happy to take the mammoth losses and bad publicity in order to get the Ricoh on the cheap as they see that as a more lucrative end for them in this saga.
So with SISU playing hard ball regardless and the FL spineless and ultimately powerless,I just can't see anything that suggests zero fans would speed up this process one iota, which is a real shame but unfortunately (and probably) indicative of the modern world of football that we live in.
Sterling your right with Sisu's stance and the reason behind that is the JR.
But the weak link would be the football league who would have to act once media pressure increased. Tell me how could they ignore no home fans from a club averaging 2-4k away ?????
Sterling your right with Sisu's stance and the reason behind that is the JR.
But the weak link would be the football league who would have to act once media pressure increased. Tell me how could they ignore no home fans from a club averaging 2-4k away ?????
Sterling your right with Sisu's stance and the reason behind that is the JR.
But the weak link would be the football league who would have to act once media pressure increased. Tell me how could they ignore no home fans from a club averaging 2-4k away ?????[/QUOTE]
They will do just that... ignore it. Haven't they stated several times that thier job is to fulfill fixtures and they cannot get involved with the running of a business?
Sterling your right
with Sisu's stance and the reason behind that is the JR.
But the weak link would be the football league who would have to act once media pressure increased. Tell me how could they ignore no home fans from a club averaging 2-4k away ?????[/QUOTE]
They will do just that... ignore it. Haven't they stated several times that thier job is to fulfill fixtures and they cannot get involved with the running of a business?
Yes they have but they have got away with it upto now due to the fact 1500 fans are validating the decision they made.
They'd have to ignore it. Intervention by forcing an organisation to a rent deal with a separate entity would in all probability be illegal so they would be unable to intervene
They'd have to ignore it. Intervention by forcing an organisation to a rent deal with a
separate entity would in all probability be illegal so they would be unable to intervene
Who says anything about forcing and anyway the football league can change their rules as they see fit just like they did in the summer !!!!
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?