Paxman II
Well-Known Member
Of course ACL want the legal process dropped - who wouldn't? Of course they want their money owed - who wouldn't?
But why is that so connected to talks?
Also this is spin from ACL, they have learned that art from their current opponents well!
When will we start seeing things a little less one sided and stop all this theorising about how these things work? How many of you commenting have ever experienced a court room, an appeal process, spoke at length to a judge and paid for opinions, had legal action against you in the business sense or even understand how companies operate?
Some on here throw comments around continuously with disregard to how these processes work.
Frankly both sides have an avenue for talks right now. That has been openly admitted by them. So then regardless of what ever else is currently taking it's course the natural thing to do is open talks and see what can be explored, achieved and possibly agreed.
That may in turn lead to the JR appeal process being dropped (and that has not been granted yet anyway, so nothing to drop is there?!)
The £590k everyone talks of is indeed subject to other processes as well ACL know. The guarantors that must be sorted and the fact it is lodged with the FL is upfront and correct.
I'm just failing understand why everyone considers ACL's spin is any different from SISU's ever is.
But why is that so connected to talks?
Also this is spin from ACL, they have learned that art from their current opponents well!
When will we start seeing things a little less one sided and stop all this theorising about how these things work? How many of you commenting have ever experienced a court room, an appeal process, spoke at length to a judge and paid for opinions, had legal action against you in the business sense or even understand how companies operate?
Some on here throw comments around continuously with disregard to how these processes work.
Frankly both sides have an avenue for talks right now. That has been openly admitted by them. So then regardless of what ever else is currently taking it's course the natural thing to do is open talks and see what can be explored, achieved and possibly agreed.
That may in turn lead to the JR appeal process being dropped (and that has not been granted yet anyway, so nothing to drop is there?!)
The £590k everyone talks of is indeed subject to other processes as well ACL know. The guarantors that must be sorted and the fact it is lodged with the FL is upfront and correct.
I'm just failing understand why everyone considers ACL's spin is any different from SISU's ever is.