Non AMP
Sky Blues Talk
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

Fisher lies (1 Viewer)

  • Thread starter Sky Blue Kid
  • Start date Sep 10, 2013
Forums New posts
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Next
1 of 5 Next Last

Sky Blue Kid

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 10, 2013
  • #1
The documents - letters from other clubs relating to transfers of players in and out of the club - appear to provide more evidence that between 2006 and 2010 players had been registered in Coventry City Football Club Limited - not CCFC Holdings as the club has repeatedly insisted. Under Telegraph questioning, Mr Fisher accepted: “In these instances, the documentation clearly shows Limited as the registering company.”.......................................................................Then why "Bare Face Lie" about them being in "Holdings"??? Of course, you'll now admit you were lying, now you've got what you wanted!
 
E

EasternGreenSkyBlue

New Member
  • Sep 10, 2013
  • #2
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
 

covcity4life

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 10, 2013
  • #3
You have answered your own question

Sisu win by any means nsccessary
 
S

SkyblueBazza

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 10, 2013
  • #4
Sky Blue Kid said:
The documents - letters from other clubs relating to transfers of players in and out of the club - appear to provide more evidence that between 2006 and 2010 players had been registered in Coventry City Football Club Limited - not CCFC Holdings as the club has repeatedly insisted. Under Telegraph questioning, Mr Fisher accepted: “In these instances, the documentation clearly shows Limited as the registering company.”.......................................................................Then why "Bare Face Lie" about them being in "Holdings"??? Of course, you'll now admit you were lying, now you've got what you wanted!
Click to expand...

I think we should avoid linking any TF (et al) statement to "the club" as of now. These people have dragged the club to places nobody historically associated with the club ever thought possible nor envisaged. The club is in administration...threatened with liquidation. Officially I think PA has all the authority over CCFC limited - the others i.e. SISU & cronies can simply go to hell as far as I'm concerned!
 

Sky Blue Kid

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 10, 2013
  • #5
@ EGSB......Just noticed your post on Craig Bellamy......You're about 10 years too late on what you say...zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
 

letsallsingtogether

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 10, 2013
  • #6
That's fine coming from you and City4life.
EasternGreenSkyBlue said:
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
Click to expand...
 

lordsummerisle

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 10, 2013
  • #7
£200,000 profit(if that) on Danny Fox is criminal.

Who was the incompetent, lying Chairman who sold him?
 
R

RoboCCFC90

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 10, 2013
  • #8
It'll be interesting to see what happens next..
 

letsallsingtogether

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 10, 2013
  • #9
Shouldn't that read FORCED to sell him.
lordsummerisle said:
£200,000 profit(if that) on Danny Fox is criminal.

Who was the incompetent, lying Chairman who sold him?
Click to expand...
 

lordsummerisle

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 10, 2013
  • #10
letsallsingtogether said:
Shouldn't that read FORCED to sell him.
Click to expand...

Ranson has never been forced to do anything.

Incompetence just came naturally.
 

hill83

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 10, 2013
  • #11
He's basically Billy Bullshit.
 

Sky Blue Kid

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 10, 2013
  • #12
@ summerisle....Sold against his wishes, hence the resignation!...btw are you Grenduffys' brother?... Yet another estimation on the price of sale of Danny Fox.
 

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 10, 2013
  • #13
Sky Blue Kid said:
@ summerisle....Sold against his wishes, hence the resignation!...btw are you Grenduffys' brother?... Yet another estimation on the price of sale of Danny Fox.
Click to expand...

Utter utter bollocks. Why would the grasping SISU sell somebody for virtually no return (if you consider his wage costs for being at the club for 18 months).
 

letsallsingtogether

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 10, 2013
  • #14
unless he is as bigger liar as fisher that is what he said when he left.
made to sell all his best players couldn't offer others what they were worth hence lost a few really good players that would have saved us all the is grief in the long run
This has carried on since he left so don't see why I should not believe him.


lordsummerisle said:
Ranson has never been forced to do anything.

Incompetence just came naturally.
Click to expand...
 

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 10, 2013
  • #15
letsallsingtogether said:
unless he is as bigger liar as fisher that is what he said when he left.
made to sell all his best players couldn't offer others what they were worth hence lost a few really good players that would have saved us all the is grief in the long run
This has carried on since he left so don't see why I should not believe him.
Click to expand...

Forced to sell his best players yet kept Keiren Westwood only to lose him for nothing later on.
 

lordsummerisle

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 10, 2013
  • #16
fernandopartridge said:
Forced to sell his best players yet kept Keiren Westwood only to lose him for nothing later on.
Click to expand...

Have no problem with selling players if it's to cover losses, but as a "successful businessman", he should at least have got a bit more money for players when he did sell them.

Especially as he said in the previous January when turning down a £1.9million bid from Newcastle that it wouldn't even buy Fox's left foot.

Maybe he had a deal to "buy" players with his hedge-fund at Celtic but didn't at Newcastle?
 

letsallsingtogether

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 10, 2013
  • #17
Oh we are the only club to have done that if they had tied him for a longer term up earlier then that would't have happened but what was he able to offer him ?

At the end of the day we will never know who made the real decisions so all of this is really just a question of opinion.

My opinion is that Sisu have lied from the off no matter who was supposed to be in charge, yours differs you believe it is all down to others.

so we might as well agree to disagree.


fernandopartridge said:
Forced to sell his best players yet kept Keiren Westwood only to lose him for nothing later on.
Click to expand...
 

Sky Blue Kid

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 10, 2013
  • #18
Hoffman, as well as Ranson have said that Igwe had the "Veto vote" so consequently "Told Ranson what to do"
 

lordsummerisle

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 10, 2013
  • #19
Sky Blue Kid said:
Hoffman, as well as Ranson have said that Igwe had the "Veto vote" so consequently "Told Ranson what to do"
Click to expand...

Wish he'd been told to "do one" before he'd even started.
 
J

jaytskyblue

New Member
  • Sep 10, 2013
  • #20
Why do Summerisle and Fernando always try and change the subject when Sisu come under criticism?

The heat is now on Timmy. Will Joy sacrifice him? It's going to happen sooner or later!
 

lordsummerisle

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 10, 2013
  • #21
jaytskyblue said:
Why do Summerisle and Fernando always try and change the subject when Sisu come under criticism?

The heat is now on Timmy. Will Joy sacrifice him? It's going to happen sooner or later!
Click to expand...

It's just that the documents revealed showed exactly how much we paid for and sold for some of our players.

All very important, especially as most people get very hot under the collar about "undisclosed".

Hardly looks like profit-stripping either, though the Fox sale may have just about covered the interest payments on Ranson's "loan".
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 10, 2013
  • #22
Why the fuss? Hussey was as good as Fox anyway.
 

TheRoyalScam

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 10, 2013
  • #23
And with that post the thread goes completely off topic.
 

lordsummerisle

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 10, 2013
  • #24
Grendel said:
Why the fuss? Hussey was as good as Fox anyway.
Click to expand...

Hussey and Wood were in fact as good as, if not better than Fox and Dann.

Just a shame that Igwe was apparently pointing a silenced Beretta at him from under his raincoat, and making "throat-cutting" motions with his hand across his own throat whilst Ranson said those words under duress.
 

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 10, 2013
  • #25
jaytskyblue said:
Why do Summerisle and Fernando always try and change the subject when Sisu come under criticism?

The heat is now on Timmy. Will Joy sacrifice him? It's going to happen sooner or later!
Click to expand...

SISU and Ranson are the same thing in the context of this discussion
 

hill83

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 10, 2013
  • #26
Without reading the thread because I can't be arsed. Are we now seeing evidence that Sisu are full of shit, but also, that they aren't asset stripping as the lunatics suggest? I wonder which will be roundly ignored.
 

hill83

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 10, 2013
  • #27
TheRoyalScam said:
And with that post the thread goes completely off topic.
Click to expand...

brilliantly kept on topic by you there. Make this lad a moderator.
 
J

jaytskyblue

New Member
  • Sep 10, 2013
  • #28
The thread is about Tim Fisher being a liar. We'll let's just say he was repeatedly economical with the true facts over a long period.
 

lordsummerisle

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 10, 2013
  • #29
hill83 said:
Without reading the thread because I can't be arsed. Are we now seeing evidence that Sisu are full of shit, but also, that they aren't asset stripping as the lunatics suggest? I wonder which will be roundly ignored.
Click to expand...

That's the thing, I always thought that we got quite a bit of money for Dann and Fox, enough to cover a years losses of around £5million at least, but nowhere near if the Dann transfer fee is on a similar basis to the Fox one. Though did see in that years accounts(when we still filed them) that we received only £3million in transfer fees to cover that period and did remark at the time that it didn't seem like much.

"Deep throat" has so far stitched up Ranson, Hoffman and Elliott with the closing the Academy down bombshell, and now the fact that not making any money on player transfers when those three on the board as well.

Sure an unintended consequence, hoping(with some justification) that it wouldn't get picked up because it doesn't fit the current current worldview.
 

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 10, 2013
  • #30
lordsummerisle said:
That's the thing, I always thought that we got quite a bit of money for Dann and Fox, enough to cover a years losses of around £5million at least, but nowhere near if the Dann transfer fee is on a similar basis to the Fox one. Though did see in that years accounts(when we still filed them) that we received only £3million in transfer fees to cover that period and did remark at the time that it didn't seem like much.

"Deep throat" has so far stitched up Ranson, Hoffman and Elliott with the closing the Academy down bombshell, and now the fact that not making any money on player transfers when those three on the board as well.

Sure an unintended consequence, hoping(with some justification) that it wouldn't get picked up because it doesn't fit the current current worldview.
Click to expand...

Or, Hoffman and Elliot happily sat on a board where they had no control for 3 years.
 

lordsummerisle

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 10, 2013
  • #31
fernandopartridge said:
Or, Hoffman and Elliot happily sat on a board where they had no control for 3 years.
Click to expand...

Along with the Chairman apparently.
 

hill83

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 10, 2013
  • #32
So effectively, they have no fucking idea what they are doing. No malice, just pure stupidity.

The Skybluestalk of club owners if you like.
 

sky blue john

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 10, 2013
  • #33
lordsummerisle said:
Along with the Chairman apparently.
Click to expand...


The only thing the Sisu thread de-railers have not mentioned is its all the councils fault !!!!
 

lordsummerisle

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 10, 2013
  • #34
sky blue john said:
The only thing the Sisu thread de-railers have not mentioned is its all the councils fault !!!!
Click to expand...

All these documents comcern the time that Ranson, Hoffman and Elliott were involved, not Fisher.
 
N

njdlawyer

New Member
  • Sep 10, 2013
  • #35
lordsummerisle said:
All these documents comcern the time that Ranson, Hoffman and Elliott were involved, not Fisher.
Click to expand...

True but even the most objective and even-handed of observers could not conclude anything but that Fisher has been more than a little cavalier about the truth surrounding matters prior to his tenure but about which he must have known all the relevant facts - unless he is a complete incompetent...
 
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Next
1 of 5 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 2 (members: 0, guests: 2)
Share:
Facebook Twitter Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
  • Default Style
  • Contact us
  • Terms and rules
  • Privacy policy
  • Help
  • Home
Community platform by XenForo® © 2010-2021 XenForo Ltd.
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Home
  • Forums
    • New posts
    • Search forums
  • What's new
    • New posts
    • Latest activity
  • Members
    • Current visitors
  • Donate to the Season Ticket Fund
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?