In what way will a rent reduction benefit the club? Where will money saved on rent go?
....into Joy's 'handbag and pretty shoes' fundIn what way will a rent reduction benefit the club? Where will money saved on rent go?
This thread alone proves that Fisher's spin is working - there are seven posters on this thread looking through their clouded sky blue glasses who believe he's right, and that ACL are 'bullies' for taking the only course open to them at the present moment.
As it stands CCFC (in reality SISU) owe over £1m in rent and also need to top up the escrow account with £500k. This has built up over 10 months.
The idea that because we're now in League 1 we should only pay an average league 1 rent is ludicrous.
If I mismanaged my business to the same degree SISU have with CCFC and lost customers (fans) and therefore revenue, do you think I should go to my landlord and say "I'm afraid I've lost half my customers through poor management, revenue streams are falling so I'm not going to pay any rent."???
And if my landlord announces that he's going to take me to court, should I start criticizing his own business with mis-truths like Fisher has with ACL?
Why do some of you think that football clubs are somehow exempt from normal business obligations?
If I mismanaged my business to the same degree SISU have with CCFC and lost customers (fans) and therefore revenue, do you think I should go to my landlord and say "I'm afraid I've lost half my customers through poor management, revenue streams are falling so I'm not going to pay any rent."???
Why would the club go under?
This thread alone proves that Fisher's spin is working - there are seven posters on this thread looking through their clouded sky blue glasses who believe he's right, and that ACL are 'bullies' for taking the only course open to them at the present moment.
As it stands CCFC (in reality SISU) owe over £1m in rent and also need to top up the escrow account with £500k. This has built up over 10 months.
The idea that because we're now in League 1 we should only pay an average league 1 rent is ludicrous.
If I mismanaged my business to the same degree SISU have with CCFC and lost customers (fans) and therefore revenue, do you think I should go to my landlord and say "I'm afraid I've lost half my customers through poor management, revenue streams are falling so I'm not going to pay any rent."???
And if my landlord announces that he's going to take me to court, should I start criticizing his own business with mis-truths like Fisher has with ACL?
Why do some of you think that football clubs are somehow exempt from normal business obligations?
But if you had a factory that was designed to output 30,000 units a week but you only had demand for 10,000 with no reason to believe that would go up in the near future you would more than likely tell your landlord you were moving out and going somewhere smaller. The problem SISU face is that due to the nature of the business they are in the options for moving are limited to say the very least. Not to say that SISU are in the right here by any stretch but if you applied the rules of a 'normal' business we'd have moved out of the Ricoh a long time ago.
this has truth to it
the rent is too much
people are letting their sisu hatred cloud their judgement
this "they knew the rent when they bought it" stuff dont wash with me, they are trying to make ccfc sustainable and that means a negotiated rent is required
however not paying full stop was a silly move imo, they should have just paid 200k at least to show acl they are willing to pay a respectable sum.
sisu are dumbasses dont get me wrong,but people acting like ACL are doing 100% to help ccfc is jsut weird.
But if you bought the business knowing full well you had no other options other than the big factory then you would have a pretty good idea it HAS to run at that level or the business fails - there is no other option - there never was for SISU - that's the business they are in - demand they can influence as we have seen - ADVERSELY - this is how they live or die in this industry.
Demand can be made to increase to the level required but it HAS to be invested in or it won't work - SISU have to INVEST and not just in the bloody rent
This is why all parties have to compromise.
All parties have budgetted with the agreed rent in mind...at the moment everyone is losing. Compromise will at least mean the losses are "fair" to all & evenly balanced. A "win-win"
yup..ai felt 400K was reasonable but seems sisu still aint happy, im not sure ACL will go much under that,sisu need to be reasonable too.
I don't think anyone are saying Fisher and SISU are right or justified in what they are doing, but if at the end of the day it achieves the desired result that will benefit the club I will not care how it was done.This thread alone proves that Fisher's spin is working - there are seven posters on this thread looking through their clouded sky blue glasses who believe he's right, and that ACL are 'bullies' for taking the only course open to them at the present moment.
As it stands CCFC (in reality SISU) owe over £1m in rent and also need to top up the escrow account with £500k. This has built up over 10 months.
The idea that because we're now in League 1 we should only pay an average league 1 rent is ludicrous.
If I mismanaged my business to the same degree SISU have with CCFC and lost customers (fans) and therefore revenue, do you think I should go to my landlord and say "I'm afraid I've lost half my customers through poor management, revenue streams are falling so I'm not going to pay any rent."???
And if my landlord announces that he's going to take me to court, should I start criticizing his own business with mis-truths like Fisher has with ACL?
Why do some of you think that football clubs are somehow exempt from normal business obligations?
Personally i wouldnt want SISU having a share in it. They are playing high stakes poker with our club and the ground and anyone prepared to do that I do not want to own either. Whilst the club will not agree a rent then the value of ACL is forced down. Makes ACL vulnerable but not just to SISU. Whilst CCFC remains financially unviable and bumping around in L1 then to include it in their exit deal actually deflates the stadium value imo.
What I think SISU want to do is not buy 50% but 100% of it. That gets rid of the option held by CCFC for starters and any agreement that only the club can own stadium goes too because SISU would control ACL and CCFC 100%. They would then seperate the two leave the football club to flounder but tied in to a lower rent - only way club breaks even is by dropping wages and performance on pitch suffers. The stadium side of things would be owned probably by SBS&L (you can switch assets around a 100% owned group very easily). Thing about SBS&L is that is where the SISU Fund loans are....... so if the stadium is then sold off at a huge profit their investor loans get repaid........ once that is done they sell off CCFC or let it go bump.
SISU have no allegiance to CCFC only to £'s. Personally I do not want an asset (the stadium) which is a cornerstone to the redevelopment of North Coventry, a large employer, a big contributor to a feel good factor (despite CCFC in the past - this season is at times different), something the city should be proud of in the hands of a hedge fund.
It is a harsh view but perhaps the best thing financially is to let the club go into admin - do a deal at 10p in the pound in a CVA, take 10 point deduction and start again at manageable debt levels with new owners who run the club viably. Once club in administration then SISU have to do a deal because the only other way out of administration is liquidation. Would ACL be open to negotiation on a lower rent, even one charged on attendance - pretty certain they would be
Just a possible scenario SBT but not impossible :thinking about:
Is this post in reply to me OSB?
I don't think securing the RICOH is necessarily their 'end game', as I think they'd rather attempt to get us to the prem so they can get sustained profit. IMO. That's my assumption based on the fact in the 'system', profit > all, I think evidence can be seen in their early attempts to sign players (Fox, Dann etc.) and their 'attempts' to sign McG (also, potentially, signs of their desperation).
Think it's time for captain mainwearing 'You stupid boy'
At last you appear to see sense and are beginning to see just who is causing this situation
Fisher /sisu
Defend? Why would SISU just pull out if they break even? They would've wasted 5 years of their time and money (as well as ours).
Also, I don't appreciate your comment.
Yes SBT it was for you
Not in the nature of hedge funds to play the long game and getting hold of the site is probably more achievable short term. They are only here now because the first plan involving Dann, Fox fell through. The idea was we would be in the Premiership by now and SISU would have sold up.
If it wasnt their end game they wouldnt be quite so beligerent over the rent either. ACL have made offers to seriously reduce the rent and worked deals on a whole range of income in favour of the club......... but SISU have flatly refused everything on the rent. Also I dont think if they were staying they would be so aggressive in the press.
Whole game is to break ACL and take the site cheaply
A few lines I got down as best I could from Tim Fisher speaking on CWR:
"I've never bowed to threats and will not bow to threats. This has to be resolved and I'm sure it can get resolved."
"It's about a community asset. For ACL to produce an analogy of being a like a house and a tenant is just odd."
"We've said we will not be bullied into a situation where we have no options. You've got to put other options on the table."
"My personal opinion... we should never have left Highfield Road. We need our spiritual home."
"We don't have a home. We don't have a ground. We have an extortionate rent."
"This has been a problem for years and years. It can't go on, this club is being bled to death. This club is spending a fortune."
"We've been very open [with ACL]. We've put in numerous requests for a meeting, but they've been turned down."
"If you describe doing the right thing as playing fast and loose, yes I'm playing fast and loose. This is about making sure the football club pays the right amount of rent."
"The difference between what we are being asked to pay and what we are expected to pay goes to one place, it goes on the pitch."
"We pay £10,000 a match"
"We will do our bit. We've always done out bit. This is a football club. We are football club front and centre in the community."
"The football club comes first. We are not playing fast and loose with the football club. "We are doing the right thing is to negotiate a rent which is competitive in League 1 and get back into the Championship."
Make of that what you will...
He was pressed repeatedly along the lines of "isn't the right thing to do to pay what you owe and then negotiate the rent?"