Frank Lampard Rumours (17 Viewers)

Are you happy with lampard


  • Total voters
    565
Status
Not open for further replies.

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
Her involvement is a doing phycological evaluations and reviewing fitness not really the same as decided who to and who not to sign. Unless I’ve missed something

She’s said she’s involved in hiring players and staff and assessing fit and mentality.
 

Mucca Mad Boys

Well-Known Member
Didn't translate in to much energy v Burnley.
10 goals in the last stages of the match this season speaks for itself. You know better than that Malc, yesterday we were outthought and outplayed.

If Edwards is coming in as a No2, does that make Lampard the manager?? I thought we were only after a head-coach and what's become of the DoF.

It's not on the BBC site yet, so I'm not believing anything you lying toerags put on here. ( no offence )
No, head coach/manager and assistant manager/assistant head coach have the same basic functions.

At the conference King confirmed he wanted Robins to hire an assistant but for whatever reason(s) that didn’t happen.
 

rob9872

Well-Known Member
How do we know she's a biological woman? Nick mentioned that man won FIFA Women's Balon D'Or, could Dr Clare really be Dr Clive? I bet if it was then lots of the nonesense on this appointment would go away.
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
How do we know she's a biological woman? Nick mentioned that man won FIFA Women's Balon D'Or, could Dr Clare really be Dr Clive? I bet if it was then lots of the nonesense on this appointment would go away.

Id still want to know why our performances and the mentality of our players has nosedived since he came in.
 

Sky Blue Goblin

Well-Known Member
She’s said she’s involved in hiring players and staff and assessing fit and mentality.
Sorry about the spelling but based on what King said at the forum that’s her role in the set up. She helps the club set up, the best practice in regards to facilities and food and performs data review.

More I’ve read, it’s more a jack of all trades in regards to performance analysis and sports science.

“In the wider remit, there’s the medical department, the sports science department, strength and conditioning, nutrition, psychology, player care and liaison, performance and data analysis. It’s really wide ranging.

I know they worked with the recruitment to do physiological appraisals but don’t think her remit in this is any further. Correct me if wrong but wanting to sack her when we’ve already got a major bill to front, seems out of place.
 

rob9872

Well-Known Member
Id still want to know why our performances and the mentality of our players has nosedived since he came in.
No experience, no leadership, new messages, key injuries and it was only 14 games in with decent results against top opposition only just prior to the sacking. Add in that we now have no direction and the players are on a rudderless ship. We'll never know, but there are mitigating factors.
 

clint van damme

Well-Known Member
People still crying that Robins was sacked and trying to blame everybody and anybody else? Fucking hell.

Suddenly an expert in coaching to have a go at coaches in blue tracksuits with iPads.

People?
Who?
Wingy asked what her role was, someone laid it out, I remarked that they'd missed out recruitment.
Only Shmmeee criticised her and even then he didn't call for her to be sacked.
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
Sorry about the spelling but based on what King said at the forum that’s her role in the set up. She helps the club set up, the best practice in regards to facilities and food and performs data review.

More I’ve read, it’s more a jack of all trades in regards to performance analysis and sports science.

“In the wider remit, there’s the medical department, the sports science department, strength and conditioning, nutrition, psychology, player care and liaison, performance and data analysis. It’s really wide ranging.

I know they worked with the recruitment to do physiological appraisals but don’t think her remit in this is any further. Correct me if wrong but wanting to sack her when we’ve already got a major bill to front, seems out of place.

She was named alongside robins as choosing the coaching staff.

If we sacked everyone behind the scenes at the club who wasn’t up to it we’d have not much left tbh, but that’s what you get with a modern system reliant on a huge staff.

I’m not even saying sack her. I’m saying from her own words her role is more than running a DISC profile.
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
No experience, no leadership, new messages, key injuries and it was only 14 games in with decent results against top opposition only just prior to the sacking. Add in that we now have no direction and the players are on a rudderless ship. We'll never know, but there are mitigating factors.

This is the overall problem i think. Whoever was responsible both playing and non playing staff had a huge turnover with most being at that level for the first time in their career. Lots of blind leading the blind going on I’d imagine. And lots of lost knowledge.
 

Sbarcher

Well-Known Member
Well, 2pm been and gone. Next milestone at 3pm. Keep’em peeled.
 

Sky Blue Goblin

Well-Known Member
She was named alongside robins as choosing the coaching staff.

If we sacked everyone behind the scenes at the club who wasn’t up to it we’d have not much left tbh, but that’s what you get with a modern system reliant on a huge staff.

I’m not even saying sack her. I’m saying from her own words her role is more than running a DISC profile.
I mean yeah of course she was named. She provides data and would be able to help Mark make a decision.

In our old system, mark was responsible for hiring his staff and probably wanted more opinions and apologies on the sack her, think that was the original viewpoint.
 

Tommo1993

Well-Known Member
If Edwards is coming in as a No2, does that make Lampard the manager?? I thought we were only after a head-coach and what's become of the DoF.

It's not on the BBC site yet, so I'm not believing anything you lying toerags put on here. ( no offence )

BBC?! The slowest people of all!
 

clint van damme

Well-Known Member
Yeah it's all made up.

Carr the "Gormless Twat" wasn't it? :ROFLMAO:

Who's on about Carr? You're swinging wildly, it's bizarre.
We're talking about Roberts. 1 persons criticised her.
And my comment on Carr wasn't he's a gormless twat, it was that he came across as a gormless twat, referring to his first interview.

You are literally doing what you're accessing others of doing.
 

mmttww

Well-Known Member
It's not. You're doing what you often accused others of doing,making things up in your head.

Not really. He's pointing out that accountability for poor results is being attributed to everyone except the person that was accountable for them. MR had final say in recruitment, coaching hires etc. and everything seems to be about everyone else. It's a bit weird.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
Who's on about Carr? You're swinging wildly, it's bizarre.
We're talking about Roberts. 1 persons criticised her.
And my comment on Carr wasn't he's a gormless twat, it was that he came across as a gormless twat, referring to his first interview.

You are literally doing what you're accessing others of doing.

Roberts would provide a report to robins on her assessment of potential signings relevant to her brief.

He had the final say based on several evaluations
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
I mean yeah of course she was named. She provides data and would be able to help Mark make a decision.

In our old system, mark was responsible for hiring his staff and probably wanted more opinions and apologies on the sack her, think that was the original viewpoint.

Everyone would give opinions. Only she was named as “me and Mark”. Believe what you want but it’s there in black and white, that’s without the rumours of her running the place behind the scenes or the other circumstantial evidence. The idea she’s a glorified fitness coach isn’t credible I’m sorry. She has Director in her title for a reason.
 

MalcSB

Well-Known Member
10 goals in the last stages of the match this season speaks for itself. You know better than that Malc, yesterday we were outthought and outplayed.


No, head coach/manager and assistant manager/assistant head coach have the same basic functions.

At the conference King confirmed he wanted Robins to hire an assistant but for whatever reason(s) that didn’t happen.
How many goals in the last stages of the match against Burnley?

Zero

How many 90 + minute goals 2021-22 without a Performance Director = 13
 

clint van damme

Well-Known Member
Not really. He's pointing out that accountability for poor results is being attributed to everyone except the person that was accountable for them. MR had final say in recruitment, coaching hires etc. and everything seems to be about everyone else. It's a bit weird.

So since Wingys post on page 137 who's attributed poor results to her?
1 person at most, (though not sure Shmmees even done that), that's not 'people'.
 

Sky Blue Goblin

Well-Known Member
Everyone would give opinions. Only she was named as “me and Mark”. Believe what you want but it’s there in black and white, that’s without the rumours of her running the place behind the scenes or the other circumstantial evidence. The idea she’s a glorified fitness coach isn’t credible I’m sorry. She has Director in her title for a reason.
Well yeah she’s the director of performance so she gets data for analysis and for sports science(fitness) basically acting as the boss of our sport science and analysis departments.

Got to be careful about rumours as we all know. But fair enough each to their own. Wish the club would do more interviews so there was less blind spots
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Top