Oh well, the idiots lapped it up already. I noticed that the posters on here who were treating it like it was fact haven't rushed to apologise for spreading misinformation have they.
Is this over the phantom punch?Looks like BBCs laura has royally fucked up and broken electoral law.
Sent from my SM-G965F using Tapatalk
No postal votes.Is this over the phantom punch?
It's actually pretty serious this time too. She should be fired.Looks like BBCs laura has royally fucked up and broken electoral law.
Sent from my SM-G965F using Tapatalk
No, she's said reports are coming in the postal votes are not looking good for Labour. Nobody should have access to those results and she should not be reporting on them. She either has a source that has completely broken the law or she's just pumping out propaganda. No other option.Is this over the phantom punch?
You forgot the Channel 4 interview with Guru-Murphy, Rochester speech (cancelled because of 5 protesters) and he even no showed his own constituency meeting which had been rearranged to suit his schedule.Andrew Neil - chicken'd out
Julie Etchingham - chicken'd out
GMTV - chicken'd out
Jeremy Vine - chicken'd out
Channel 4 climate debate - chicken'd out
Weighting for voting by age groups... they’ve played down younger vote and overstated (less so) turnout in older people.
Electoral Commission seem to be aware, they’ve just tweeted this:It's actually pretty serious this time too. She should be fired.
No, she's said reports are coming in the postal votes are not looking good for Labour. Nobody should have access to those results and she should not be reporting on them. She either has a source that has completely broken the law or she's just pumping out propaganda. No other option.
Is this over the phantom punch?
Kienssberg and Peston both reported, based on information from ‘senior Conservative sources’ that Hancock had been punched by a Labour activist.What's that?
I think it says a lot more about the Tories, that his so called 'friend' would secretly record him then leak it, for political gains.
Kienssberg and Peston both reported, based on information from ‘senior Conservative sources’ that Hancock had been punched by a Labour activist.
However there was video footage showing it to be untrue.
We were worried about Russian interference but the autocratic disinformation campaign is coming from inside the U.K.
If the Tories win this our democracy is fucked. This shit will become normal.
She will get away with it somehow but the police should be on at her to reveal her source. She's literally either complicit in breaking the law or making stuff up. Neither should be acceptable for a BBC politics editor.Electoral Commission seem to be aware, they’ve just tweeted this:
sure it will be claimed it’s just another BBC error but isn’t it odd how they have made multiple errors favouring the Conservatives and not one favouring Labour?
Which is indirectly happily interfering by undermining.I see Barnier has been caught saying that Boris can’t get the trade deal done by 2021. Extension for Boris Johnson please.
She should know better. Ego-trip which could arguably influence some probably small number of voters (but in what way is anyone's guess)No postal votes.
Sent from my SM-G965F using Tapatalk
Kuennesburg has definitely not come across as impartial during this election campaign, and has shown poor journalistic ability in her reporting. But of course the BBC is a commie/leftie propaganda machine........
Rubbish she is totally impartial and that’s why you don’t like her
In fairness, who knows her intent by reporting this?Just thought I'd put these back up........
In fairness, who knows her intent by reporting this?
Several people I have heard previously on the radio openly said they voted leave in the referendum because they felt a bit sorry for the leave camp as some the polls they looked at suggested a comfortable remain win.
Fact is IF she was just trying to be first to report for her own ego she needs to be put through the mill. IF she is found to be deliberately breaching the rules she deserves to have the rulebook (coz it's no doubt humongous) thrown in her smug face & be dismissed
In fairness, who knows her intent by reporting this?
Several people I have heard previously on the radio openly said they voted leave in the referendum because they felt a bit sorry for the leave camp as some the polls they looked at suggested a comfortable remain win.
Fact is IF she was just trying to be first to report for her own ego she needs to be put through the mill. IF she is found to be deliberately breaching the rules she deserves to have the rulebook (coz it's no doubt humongous) thrown in her smug face & be dismissed
Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
After going over it again and again in my head, and flip flopping... The only reason I'd vote Conservative is for brexit.
Therefore there are many more things I care about more and Labour will get my vote tomorrow
I've done a 360 basically
It's actually pretty serious this time too. She should be fired.
No, she's said reports are coming in the postal votes are not looking good for Labour. Nobody should have access to those results and she should not be reporting on them. She either has a source that has completely broken the law or she's just pumping out propaganda. No other option.
I’m going to make some predictions on this.It's actually pretty serious this time too. She should be fired.
No, she's said reports are coming in the postal votes are not looking good for Labour. Nobody should have access to those results and she should not be reporting on them. She either has a source that has completely broken the law or she's just pumping out propaganda. No other option.
Just thought I'd put these back up........
Yeah, but Get Brexit Done.
How anyone can watch this and vote tory I do not know
Either that or just obvious. The yard sticks are there. They’re called every trade deal negotiated in the history of the world.Which is indirectly happily interfering by undermining.
Just as bad as t'others who've commented
Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
Labour's policy still gives the opportunity for Brexit anyway, so you're not throwing it out.After going over it again and again in my head, and flip flopping... The only reason I'd vote Conservative is for brexit.
Therefore there are many more things I care about more and Labour will get my vote tomorrow
I've done a 360 basically
Yes, second that.Labour's policy still gives the opportunity for Brexit anyway, so you're not throwing it out.
Bravo for not seeing it as a one-issue election, anyway!
As one union official said in politics you walk on one side of the road or the other - those that walk in the middle tend to get run overYes, second that.
Labour have promised a new deal that will then be put to the electorate, so they can be held to account for that if they don't
The roads by me don't have cars.As one union official said in politics you walk on one side of the road or the other - those that walk in the middle tend to get run over
No I think it was more stupid to be honestAhh, the old Remain arrogance.
Never heard of a central reservation?As one union official said in politics you walk on one side of the road or the other - those that walk in the middle tend to get run over
I thought they'd moved all the Indians off of those.Never heard of a central reservation?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?