Why only copy and paste half my post. Not quite so divisive then, is it.
If people want to go, then good luck to them. I choose not to anymore.
You must disagree with me regarding the comment about the worlds best business people then.
Speaking of vanishing and making things up.
It was also inevitable at some point given we had one of thr lowest 3-4 turnovers in the league and were losjng £5-6m pa, just scraping relegation.I don't agree with that. I just don't think they don't care either way. Its an asset on a balance sheet and it has to break even.
Fisher himself has stated that, higher the league, the harder to be self sufficient, the lower the league the easier it is.Speaking of vanishing and making things up.
It is, the FFP rules are different in league one and two (limit player spend to 60% turnover) compared to championship (lose up to £13m pa). Thats completely different to what John is saying. And the breakeven strategy is only a recent one.Fisher himself has stated that, higher the league, the harder to be self sufficient, the lower the league the easier it is.
It doesn't bother some fans though, that Sisu purposefully got us relegated from the championship, in the attempt to get a bigger compensation payout !
Thanks
Some fans fully endorsed it with their unwavering support of a clueless manager.
So by selling our top scorer at the time wasn't suicide ?
Would they be the 2,300 regulars to sixfields ?
Would they be the 2,300 regulars to sixfields ?
No, those fans who backed Thorn and abused anyone who dared to speak out.
No, those fans who backed Thorn and abused anyone who dared to speak out.
Yes it is divisive. You are saying anyone that goes to see the club they support is lickng up to the owners. You've made your decision and let others make theirs. There are many luke you who try and stamp their POV on others and it is wrong and shouldn't happen.
The bit i didn't quote was just your opinion, which you are entitled to. Let others make up their own minds without the childish comments
Somewhat old news but the club actually got more points post sale - still always nice to see care in the community in action over Christmas
Will be interesting to see if you think this comment is divisive Torchmatic.
No, those fans who backed Thorn and abused anyone who dared to speak out. The decision to employ him for a major factor in our relegation. It was interesting that some regarded him as one of the best managers in the country, yet refused to praise Sisu for hiring him.
I
Lol who employed him and who sold our leading goal scorer ?
I rest my case that relegation was all part of their master plan !
I
Lol who employed him and who sold our leading goal scorer ?
I rest my case that relegation was all part of their master plan !
Somewhat old news but the club actually got more points post sale - still always nice to see care in the community in action over Christmas
True - if they win one case then they really will win big! However, SISU strategy is more like a gambler who keeps gambling despite a long losing streaknot necessarily. Keep running at break even and keep the court cases going. If they lose, doesnt really matter, as its peanuts to them and the club is breaking even, whatever league we are in.
Win one case though, and its pay off time. Ironically, the lower down the leagues we are, the higher the compensation claim would be, as we were a "established championship club" before the stadium issue.
Sorry - quote marks so not work - regarding SBJ and divisive;
Sky Blue John is a long absent regular who was extremely divisive - constantly mocking the sixfields attendees as the sisu social club and anyone who attended games as being part of a sisu posee.
I can assure you he will give out as much as he gets back
Lol, I never went to sixfield, but that sir is possibly one of the most cuntish things I've ever read on here.The fans who went to sixfields cost the club any chance of owning a share in the Ricoh !
Unlike the current tosspot RR resigned when he realised they had no intentions of meaningful investment.Haha. You cannot be serious. He was Joys first puppet.
Okay with me but same applies to my post, which was not directed at him.Sorry - quote marks so not work - regarding SBJ and divisive;
Sky Blue John is a long absent regular who was extremely divisive - constantly mocking the sixfields attendees as the sisu social club and anyone who attended games as being part of a sisu posee.
I can assure you he will give out as much as he gets back
Unlike the current tosspot RR resigned when he realised they had no intentions of meaningful investment.
With our experience over the last few years regarding sisu I believe what he said about getting ,Andy Carroll, Jordan Henderson and Jack Cork all for the princely sum of around 2 mill.
The man gets an lot of unfair stick imo.
Will be interesting to see if you think above comment is divisive Torchmatic.
Unlike the current tosspot RR resigned when he realised they had no intentions of meaningful investment.
With our experience over the last few years regarding sisu I believe what he said about getting ,Andy Carroll, Jordan Henderson and Jack Cork all for the princely sum of around 2 mill.
The man gets an lot of unfair stick imo.
Grendull and co following the sisu piped piper to sixfields cost the club dearly !
And what winds me up the most is when Fisher says " the club cannot survive without year round revenues and owning its own ground". THEN F@@KING DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT.
Where do you suggest the club gets the money from to build its own stadium?
Absolute rubbish stupot07.... Have you got selective memory or what?... Almost at the beginning of SISU tenure(When Coleman was brought in) RR/SISU quotes of "22k is break even" or do you conveniently forget that "Famous quote"It is, the FFP rules are different in league one and two (limit player spend to 60% turnover) compared to championship (lose up to £13m pa). Thats completely different to what John is saying. And the breakeven strategy is only a recent one.
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?