Yeah but young people these days have no respect compared to the good old days.Stumbled across the anti Israeli government demonstation in London today. It included a wide range of young kids and old people from across UK and was somewhere between 200-250k. Colourful, noisy and a few pyros too!
Where I was stood suddenly a dozen EDL type nutcases turned up waving England flags and singing 'Engerland' in demonstrators faces trying to get a reaction whilst being filmed by their girlfriends/wives. Bit of a scuffle but great restraint shown by demonstrators and some of EDL got arrested before they dragged themselves back to Weatherspoons in Leicester Square. All EDL type twats were pissed up and in their 50s and sounded like a bedraggled mix of brummies and yorkshire numbskulls. They were clearly organised though. Embarrassing.
Do do do do do do do doooooGazolba?
That's if you blindly believe his story , got their accents and everythingYeah but young people these days have no respect compared to the good old days.
He only backtracked because he fucked it up earlier in the week.
Supposed to be a human rights lawyer FFS….
David Lammy was not backtracking at all and supports the movement of Gaza population and Hamas are the block to achieve it
What a wanker.
There are people moving and there are people being bombed whilst they move.David Lammy was not backtracking at all and supports the movement of Gaza population and Hamas are the block to achieve it
There are people moving and there are people being bombed whilst they move.
Sent from my Pixel 7 using Tapatalk
He certainly seems a very different Mr Lammy to the one who served under Mr Corbyn
What a truly, scummy, disgrace of a newspaper, is the Mail (Daily or Sunday. Both as bad)
This is the headline they have gone with? Seriously?
View attachment 32129
I agree, the pictures are sick, but the headline itself actually states TWO women amongst THOUSANDS.
And the pics are oh SO prominent aren't they, so prominent the paper has had to encircle them for us to readers to see them.How were the police supposed to spot them amongst the thousands of protesters?
You can see the angle they are going for can't you and once again, they love to stir up hatred.
Right not to go all tinfoil hat. But who sellotapes badges to their back?
That's if you blindly believe his story , got their accents and everything
Stumbled across the anti Israeli government demonstation in London today. It included a wide range of young kids and old people from across UK and was somewhere between 200-250k. Colourful, noisy and a few pyros too!
Where I was stood suddenly a dozen EDL type nutcases turned up waving England flags and singing 'Engerland' in demonstrators faces trying to get a reaction whilst being filmed by their girlfriends/wives. Bit of a scuffle but great restraint shown by demonstrators and some of EDL got arrested before they dragged themselves back to Weatherspoons in Leicester Square. All EDL type twats were pissed up and in their 50s and sounded like a bedraggled mix of brummies and yorkshire numbskulls. They were clearly organised though. Embarrassing.
I think it's more about the party message itselfYet again SBT is shocked to hear that cabinet responsibility and party message exists.
I think it's more about the party message itself
Sent from my Pixel 7 using Tapatalk
So will this get as many comments as a panicked reply when corner by an interviewer?
Nah
"A panicked reply"?
That's a poor justification, if Starmer didn't know he was going to get asked about the situation he's an idiot. Is he an idiot, would you say?
I'll help you. He's not. It was obvious he'd get asked about Israel, he wasn't ambushed.
So. The reason he's moved to this position now, is that he's realised that it's acceptable from electoral perspective. That's the only calculus that matters to Starmer. Panicked reply? Nah.
I get it you're never going to give him an credit."A panicked reply"?
That's a poor justification, if Starmer didn't know he was going to get asked about the situation he's an idiot. Is he an idiot, would you say?
I'll help you. He's not. It was obvious he'd get asked about Israel, he wasn't ambushed.
So. The reason he's moved to this position now, is that he's realised that it's acceptable from electoral perspective. That's the only calculus that matters to Starmer. Panicked reply? Nah.
I was watching this morning and had to switch him off.He certainly seems a very different Mr Lammy to the one who served under Mr Corbyn
Hmm I think you're underplaying that. It was one of the many sticks used to beat Corbyn with after all.I get it you're never going to give him an credit.
Not acceptable from electoral perspective? In between the statements their lead in the polling went up. People are not going to vote based on this. If you think that the Israel/Hamas conflict and peoples views on it will effect the next GE then I have some magic beans to sell you.
Many people didn't vote corbyn because they percieved him to be sympathetic with terrorist organisationsI get it you're never going to give him an credit.
Not acceptable from electoral perspective? In between the statements their lead in the polling went up. People are not going to vote based on this. If you think that the Israel/Hamas conflict and peoples views on it will effect the next GE then I have some magic beans to sell you.
Netanyahu is a clear example of when you let a terrorist become a politician and then leader of a country.Many people didn't vote corbyn because they percieved him to be sympathetic with terrorist organisations
Netanyahu is a clear example of when you let a terrorist become a politician and then leader of a country.
Netanyahu is a clear example of when you let a terrorist become a politician and then leader of a country.
He’s sanctioned the indiscriminate killing of innocent people for his own agenda, surely the definition of someone who is a terrorist.Surely that's a personal opinion , Netanyahu is as much a terrorist as say George Bush or Tony Blair
He’s sanctioned the indiscriminate killing of innocent people for his own agenda, surely the definition of someone who is a terrorist.
The other two probably too if you like.
Surely that's a personal opinion , Netanyahu is as much a terrorist as say George Bush or Tony Blair
I'd say hes worse as at least the other two weren't attempting a genocide, though so much shit that's happened in the last 20 years is down to them.
Jesus christ
What's incorrect about my statement?
Hamas are the terrorists clint , end of story , they are also elected by the people in gaza , they voted for terrorism
Why does this forum love a terrorist
Again, Hamas do not represent all of Palestine. Israel has the people of the West bank living under similar conditions to Gaza.
Over a million people in Gaza are under 15, they've never had a vote but will suffer as a consequence of what is happening.
I've condemned Hamas consistently on this thread, (and linked articles which show Netanyanhu enabled them to weaken Fatah).
What Israel are doing is genocide by its very definition.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?